Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite Resins

Abstract The study verified the bond strength in simulated dental restorations of silorane- or methacrylate-based composites repaired with methacrylate-based composite. Methacrylate- (P60) or silorane-based (P90) composites were used associated with adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2). Twenty-four hemi-hourglass-shaped samples were repaired with each composite (n=12). Samples were divided according to groups: G1= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2+ P60; G2= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling; G3= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60; and G4= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling. G1 and G3 were submitted to tensile test 24 h after repair procedure, and G2 and G4 after submitted to 5,000 thermocycles at 5 and 55 ?#61616;C for 30 s in each bath. Tensile bond strength test was accomplished in an universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%). Sample failure pattern (adhesive, cohesive in resin or mixed) was evaluated by stereomicroscope at 30?#61655; and images were obtained in SEM. Bond strength values of methacrylate-based composite samples repaired with methacrylate-based composite (G1 and G2) were greater than for silorane-based samples (G3 and G4). Thermocycling decreased the bond strength values for both composites. All groups showed predominance of adhesive failures and no cohesive failure in composite resin was observed. In conclusion, higher bond strength values were observed in methacrylate-based resin samples and greater percentage of adhesive failures in silorane-based resin samples, both composites repaired with methacrylate-based resin.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Consani,Rafael Leonardo Xediek, Marinho,Tatiane, Bacchi,Atais, Caldas,Ricardo Armini, Feitosa,Victor Pinheiro, Pfeifer,Carmem Silvia
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402016000400463
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402016000400463
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020160004004632016-09-20Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite ResinsConsani,Rafael Leonardo XediekMarinho,TatianeBacchi,AtaisCaldas,Ricardo ArminiFeitosa,Victor PinheiroPfeifer,Carmem Silvia dental composite methacrylate silorane repair bond strength Abstract The study verified the bond strength in simulated dental restorations of silorane- or methacrylate-based composites repaired with methacrylate-based composite. Methacrylate- (P60) or silorane-based (P90) composites were used associated with adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2). Twenty-four hemi-hourglass-shaped samples were repaired with each composite (n=12). Samples were divided according to groups: G1= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2+ P60; G2= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling; G3= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60; and G4= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling. G1 and G3 were submitted to tensile test 24 h after repair procedure, and G2 and G4 after submitted to 5,000 thermocycles at 5 and 55 ?#61616;C for 30 s in each bath. Tensile bond strength test was accomplished in an universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%). Sample failure pattern (adhesive, cohesive in resin or mixed) was evaluated by stereomicroscope at 30?#61655; and images were obtained in SEM. Bond strength values of methacrylate-based composite samples repaired with methacrylate-based composite (G1 and G2) were greater than for silorane-based samples (G3 and G4). Thermocycling decreased the bond strength values for both composites. All groups showed predominance of adhesive failures and no cohesive failure in composite resin was observed. In conclusion, higher bond strength values were observed in methacrylate-based resin samples and greater percentage of adhesive failures in silorane-based resin samples, both composites repaired with methacrylate-based resin.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.27 n.4 20162016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402016000400463en10.1590/0103-6440201600730
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Consani,Rafael Leonardo Xediek
Marinho,Tatiane
Bacchi,Atais
Caldas,Ricardo Armini
Feitosa,Victor Pinheiro
Pfeifer,Carmem Silvia
spellingShingle Consani,Rafael Leonardo Xediek
Marinho,Tatiane
Bacchi,Atais
Caldas,Ricardo Armini
Feitosa,Victor Pinheiro
Pfeifer,Carmem Silvia
Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite Resins
author_facet Consani,Rafael Leonardo Xediek
Marinho,Tatiane
Bacchi,Atais
Caldas,Ricardo Armini
Feitosa,Victor Pinheiro
Pfeifer,Carmem Silvia
author_sort Consani,Rafael Leonardo Xediek
title Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite Resins
title_short Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite Resins
title_full Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite Resins
title_fullStr Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite Resins
title_full_unstemmed Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite Resins
title_sort repair strength in simulated restorations of methacrylate- or silorane-based composite resins
description Abstract The study verified the bond strength in simulated dental restorations of silorane- or methacrylate-based composites repaired with methacrylate-based composite. Methacrylate- (P60) or silorane-based (P90) composites were used associated with adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2). Twenty-four hemi-hourglass-shaped samples were repaired with each composite (n=12). Samples were divided according to groups: G1= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2+ P60; G2= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling; G3= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60; and G4= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling. G1 and G3 were submitted to tensile test 24 h after repair procedure, and G2 and G4 after submitted to 5,000 thermocycles at 5 and 55 ?#61616;C for 30 s in each bath. Tensile bond strength test was accomplished in an universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%). Sample failure pattern (adhesive, cohesive in resin or mixed) was evaluated by stereomicroscope at 30?#61655; and images were obtained in SEM. Bond strength values of methacrylate-based composite samples repaired with methacrylate-based composite (G1 and G2) were greater than for silorane-based samples (G3 and G4). Thermocycling decreased the bond strength values for both composites. All groups showed predominance of adhesive failures and no cohesive failure in composite resin was observed. In conclusion, higher bond strength values were observed in methacrylate-based resin samples and greater percentage of adhesive failures in silorane-based resin samples, both composites repaired with methacrylate-based resin.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402016000400463
work_keys_str_mv AT consanirafaelleonardoxediek repairstrengthinsimulatedrestorationsofmethacrylateorsiloranebasedcompositeresins
AT marinhotatiane repairstrengthinsimulatedrestorationsofmethacrylateorsiloranebasedcompositeresins
AT bacchiatais repairstrengthinsimulatedrestorationsofmethacrylateorsiloranebasedcompositeresins
AT caldasricardoarmini repairstrengthinsimulatedrestorationsofmethacrylateorsiloranebasedcompositeresins
AT feitosavictorpinheiro repairstrengthinsimulatedrestorationsofmethacrylateorsiloranebasedcompositeresins
AT pfeifercarmemsilvia repairstrengthinsimulatedrestorationsofmethacrylateorsiloranebasedcompositeresins
_version_ 1756404579535159296