New Methodology to Evaluate Bond Strength of Root-End Filling Materials

This study evaluated the bond strength of root-end filling materials to root-end cavities using a new methodology. Twenty maxillary central incisors were subjected to biomechanical preparation (#80 hand file) and sectioned transversally 2 mm short of the apex and 4 mm coronally to this point. The root cylinders were embedded in acrylic resin and positioned at 45° to the horizontal plane for preparation of root-end cavities with a diamond ultrasonic retrotip. Two groups (n=10) were formed according to the root-end filling material: MTA and Super EBA. A gutta-percha cone (#80) was tug-backed at the limit between the canal and the root-end cavity. The cavity was filled and the gutta-percha cone was removed after complete setting of the sealer. The specimens were placed in an Instron machine with the root-end filling turned downwards. The push-out shaft was inserted in the space previously occupied by the gutta-percha cone and run at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min for pushing out the root-end filling material. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (α=5%). Super EBA (6.03±1.31) presented higher bond strength (MPa) than MTA (1.81±0.45) (p>0.05). There was a predominance of cohesive failures for Super EBA and mixed for MTA. The protocol of specimen preparation is effective and introduces a specific methodology for assessing bond strength of root-end filling materials to dentin. Among the materials, Super EBA presented the highest bond strength.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marques,Jorge Henrique Stefaneli, Silva-Sousa,Yara Teresinha Corrêa, Rached-Júnior,Fuad Jacob Abi, Mazzi-Chaves,Jardel Francisco, Miranda,Carlos Eduardo Saraiva, Silva,Silvio Rocha Correa da, Steier,Liviu, Sousa-Neto,Manoel Damião
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000300288
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402015000300288
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020150003002882015-07-14New Methodology to Evaluate Bond Strength of Root-End Filling MaterialsMarques,Jorge Henrique StefaneliSilva-Sousa,Yara Teresinha CorrêaRached-Júnior,Fuad Jacob AbiMazzi-Chaves,Jardel FranciscoMiranda,Carlos Eduardo SaraivaSilva,Silvio Rocha Correa daSteier,LiviuSousa-Neto,Manoel Damião endodontics root-end filling materials bond strength push-out This study evaluated the bond strength of root-end filling materials to root-end cavities using a new methodology. Twenty maxillary central incisors were subjected to biomechanical preparation (#80 hand file) and sectioned transversally 2 mm short of the apex and 4 mm coronally to this point. The root cylinders were embedded in acrylic resin and positioned at 45° to the horizontal plane for preparation of root-end cavities with a diamond ultrasonic retrotip. Two groups (n=10) were formed according to the root-end filling material: MTA and Super EBA. A gutta-percha cone (#80) was tug-backed at the limit between the canal and the root-end cavity. The cavity was filled and the gutta-percha cone was removed after complete setting of the sealer. The specimens were placed in an Instron machine with the root-end filling turned downwards. The push-out shaft was inserted in the space previously occupied by the gutta-percha cone and run at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min for pushing out the root-end filling material. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (α=5%). Super EBA (6.03±1.31) presented higher bond strength (MPa) than MTA (1.81±0.45) (p>0.05). There was a predominance of cohesive failures for Super EBA and mixed for MTA. The protocol of specimen preparation is effective and introduces a specific methodology for assessing bond strength of root-end filling materials to dentin. Among the materials, Super EBA presented the highest bond strength.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.26 n.3 20152015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000300288en10.1590/0103-6440201300189
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Marques,Jorge Henrique Stefaneli
Silva-Sousa,Yara Teresinha Corrêa
Rached-Júnior,Fuad Jacob Abi
Mazzi-Chaves,Jardel Francisco
Miranda,Carlos Eduardo Saraiva
Silva,Silvio Rocha Correa da
Steier,Liviu
Sousa-Neto,Manoel Damião
spellingShingle Marques,Jorge Henrique Stefaneli
Silva-Sousa,Yara Teresinha Corrêa
Rached-Júnior,Fuad Jacob Abi
Mazzi-Chaves,Jardel Francisco
Miranda,Carlos Eduardo Saraiva
Silva,Silvio Rocha Correa da
Steier,Liviu
Sousa-Neto,Manoel Damião
New Methodology to Evaluate Bond Strength of Root-End Filling Materials
author_facet Marques,Jorge Henrique Stefaneli
Silva-Sousa,Yara Teresinha Corrêa
Rached-Júnior,Fuad Jacob Abi
Mazzi-Chaves,Jardel Francisco
Miranda,Carlos Eduardo Saraiva
Silva,Silvio Rocha Correa da
Steier,Liviu
Sousa-Neto,Manoel Damião
author_sort Marques,Jorge Henrique Stefaneli
title New Methodology to Evaluate Bond Strength of Root-End Filling Materials
title_short New Methodology to Evaluate Bond Strength of Root-End Filling Materials
title_full New Methodology to Evaluate Bond Strength of Root-End Filling Materials
title_fullStr New Methodology to Evaluate Bond Strength of Root-End Filling Materials
title_full_unstemmed New Methodology to Evaluate Bond Strength of Root-End Filling Materials
title_sort new methodology to evaluate bond strength of root-end filling materials
description This study evaluated the bond strength of root-end filling materials to root-end cavities using a new methodology. Twenty maxillary central incisors were subjected to biomechanical preparation (#80 hand file) and sectioned transversally 2 mm short of the apex and 4 mm coronally to this point. The root cylinders were embedded in acrylic resin and positioned at 45° to the horizontal plane for preparation of root-end cavities with a diamond ultrasonic retrotip. Two groups (n=10) were formed according to the root-end filling material: MTA and Super EBA. A gutta-percha cone (#80) was tug-backed at the limit between the canal and the root-end cavity. The cavity was filled and the gutta-percha cone was removed after complete setting of the sealer. The specimens were placed in an Instron machine with the root-end filling turned downwards. The push-out shaft was inserted in the space previously occupied by the gutta-percha cone and run at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min for pushing out the root-end filling material. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (α=5%). Super EBA (6.03±1.31) presented higher bond strength (MPa) than MTA (1.81±0.45) (p>0.05). There was a predominance of cohesive failures for Super EBA and mixed for MTA. The protocol of specimen preparation is effective and introduces a specific methodology for assessing bond strength of root-end filling materials to dentin. Among the materials, Super EBA presented the highest bond strength.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000300288
work_keys_str_mv AT marquesjorgehenriquestefaneli newmethodologytoevaluatebondstrengthofrootendfillingmaterials
AT silvasousayarateresinhacorrea newmethodologytoevaluatebondstrengthofrootendfillingmaterials
AT rachedjuniorfuadjacobabi newmethodologytoevaluatebondstrengthofrootendfillingmaterials
AT mazzichavesjardelfrancisco newmethodologytoevaluatebondstrengthofrootendfillingmaterials
AT mirandacarloseduardosaraiva newmethodologytoevaluatebondstrengthofrootendfillingmaterials
AT silvasilviorochacorreada newmethodologytoevaluatebondstrengthofrootendfillingmaterials
AT steierliviu newmethodologytoevaluatebondstrengthofrootendfillingmaterials
AT sousanetomanoeldamiao newmethodologytoevaluatebondstrengthofrootendfillingmaterials
_version_ 1756404559027109888