Influence of Apical Patency and Cleaning of the Apical Foramen on Periapical Extrusion in Retreatment

This study evaluated the influence of apical patency, root filling removal technique and cleaning of the apical foramen, concerning the amount of debris extruded during root canal retreatment. Forty mandibular incisors were randomly assigned to 4 groups - GIM (n=10), GIIM (n=10), GIPT (n=10) and GIIPT (n=10), which were named according to leaving (I) or not (II) apical patency during canal preparation and filling removal technique (manual - M or ProTaper system - PT). After filling material removal, each specimen of each group had the apical foramen cleaned by sizes 15, 20 and 25 instruments, generating 12 subgroups: GIM15, GIM20, GIM25, GIIM15, GIIM20, GIIM25, GIPT15, GIPT20, GIPT25, GIIPT15, GIIPT20 and GIIPT25. Extruded filling debris was collected by a Milipore filtration system, an HV-durapore, 0.45 µm pore filter with a 25 mm diameter. The filters were weighed before and after the collection on an analytical scale (10–5 g), and the difference was calculated. The mean weight of extruded filling debris was analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman ANOVA tests (α=0.05). The mean values found in the groups (in mg) were: GIM (0.95±0.94), GIIM (0.47±0.62), GIPT (0.30±0.31) and GIIPT (0.32±0.44). There was no statistically significant difference among any of the groups or subgroups (p>0.05). ProTaper provided the smallest amount of extruded filling material, regardless of presence or absence of apical patency, followed by manual technique, without and with apical patency. Additional amounts of debris were collected during cleaning of the apical foramen, regardless of the instrument, presence/absence of patency or root filling removal technique.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deonizio,Marili Doro Andrade, Sydney,Gilson Blitzkow, Batista,Antonio, Pontarolo,Roberto, Guimarães,Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt, Gavini,Giulio
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000500482
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402013000500482
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020130005004822015-10-27Influence of Apical Patency and Cleaning of the Apical Foramen on Periapical Extrusion in RetreatmentDeonizio,Marili Doro AndradeSydney,Gilson BlitzkowBatista,AntonioPontarolo,RobertoGuimarães,Paulo Ricardo BittencourtGavini,Giulio endodontic retreatment ProTaper universal system apical extrusion manual instrumentation apical patency This study evaluated the influence of apical patency, root filling removal technique and cleaning of the apical foramen, concerning the amount of debris extruded during root canal retreatment. Forty mandibular incisors were randomly assigned to 4 groups - GIM (n=10), GIIM (n=10), GIPT (n=10) and GIIPT (n=10), which were named according to leaving (I) or not (II) apical patency during canal preparation and filling removal technique (manual - M or ProTaper system - PT). After filling material removal, each specimen of each group had the apical foramen cleaned by sizes 15, 20 and 25 instruments, generating 12 subgroups: GIM15, GIM20, GIM25, GIIM15, GIIM20, GIIM25, GIPT15, GIPT20, GIPT25, GIIPT15, GIIPT20 and GIIPT25. Extruded filling debris was collected by a Milipore filtration system, an HV-durapore, 0.45 µm pore filter with a 25 mm diameter. The filters were weighed before and after the collection on an analytical scale (10–5 g), and the difference was calculated. The mean weight of extruded filling debris was analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman ANOVA tests (α=0.05). The mean values found in the groups (in mg) were: GIM (0.95±0.94), GIIM (0.47±0.62), GIPT (0.30±0.31) and GIIPT (0.32±0.44). There was no statistically significant difference among any of the groups or subgroups (p>0.05). ProTaper provided the smallest amount of extruded filling material, regardless of presence or absence of apical patency, followed by manual technique, without and with apical patency. Additional amounts of debris were collected during cleaning of the apical foramen, regardless of the instrument, presence/absence of patency or root filling removal technique.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.5 20132013-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000500482en10.1590/0103-6440201302016
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Deonizio,Marili Doro Andrade
Sydney,Gilson Blitzkow
Batista,Antonio
Pontarolo,Roberto
Guimarães,Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt
Gavini,Giulio
spellingShingle Deonizio,Marili Doro Andrade
Sydney,Gilson Blitzkow
Batista,Antonio
Pontarolo,Roberto
Guimarães,Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt
Gavini,Giulio
Influence of Apical Patency and Cleaning of the Apical Foramen on Periapical Extrusion in Retreatment
author_facet Deonizio,Marili Doro Andrade
Sydney,Gilson Blitzkow
Batista,Antonio
Pontarolo,Roberto
Guimarães,Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt
Gavini,Giulio
author_sort Deonizio,Marili Doro Andrade
title Influence of Apical Patency and Cleaning of the Apical Foramen on Periapical Extrusion in Retreatment
title_short Influence of Apical Patency and Cleaning of the Apical Foramen on Periapical Extrusion in Retreatment
title_full Influence of Apical Patency and Cleaning of the Apical Foramen on Periapical Extrusion in Retreatment
title_fullStr Influence of Apical Patency and Cleaning of the Apical Foramen on Periapical Extrusion in Retreatment
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Apical Patency and Cleaning of the Apical Foramen on Periapical Extrusion in Retreatment
title_sort influence of apical patency and cleaning of the apical foramen on periapical extrusion in retreatment
description This study evaluated the influence of apical patency, root filling removal technique and cleaning of the apical foramen, concerning the amount of debris extruded during root canal retreatment. Forty mandibular incisors were randomly assigned to 4 groups - GIM (n=10), GIIM (n=10), GIPT (n=10) and GIIPT (n=10), which were named according to leaving (I) or not (II) apical patency during canal preparation and filling removal technique (manual - M or ProTaper system - PT). After filling material removal, each specimen of each group had the apical foramen cleaned by sizes 15, 20 and 25 instruments, generating 12 subgroups: GIM15, GIM20, GIM25, GIIM15, GIIM20, GIIM25, GIPT15, GIPT20, GIPT25, GIIPT15, GIIPT20 and GIIPT25. Extruded filling debris was collected by a Milipore filtration system, an HV-durapore, 0.45 µm pore filter with a 25 mm diameter. The filters were weighed before and after the collection on an analytical scale (10–5 g), and the difference was calculated. The mean weight of extruded filling debris was analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman ANOVA tests (α=0.05). The mean values found in the groups (in mg) were: GIM (0.95±0.94), GIIM (0.47±0.62), GIPT (0.30±0.31) and GIIPT (0.32±0.44). There was no statistically significant difference among any of the groups or subgroups (p>0.05). ProTaper provided the smallest amount of extruded filling material, regardless of presence or absence of apical patency, followed by manual technique, without and with apical patency. Additional amounts of debris were collected during cleaning of the apical foramen, regardless of the instrument, presence/absence of patency or root filling removal technique.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000500482
work_keys_str_mv AT deoniziomarilidoroandrade influenceofapicalpatencyandcleaningoftheapicalforamenonperiapicalextrusioninretreatment
AT sydneygilsonblitzkow influenceofapicalpatencyandcleaningoftheapicalforamenonperiapicalextrusioninretreatment
AT batistaantonio influenceofapicalpatencyandcleaningoftheapicalforamenonperiapicalextrusioninretreatment
AT pontaroloroberto influenceofapicalpatencyandcleaningoftheapicalforamenonperiapicalextrusioninretreatment
AT guimaraespauloricardobittencourt influenceofapicalpatencyandcleaningoftheapicalforamenonperiapicalextrusioninretreatment
AT gavinigiulio influenceofapicalpatencyandcleaningoftheapicalforamenonperiapicalextrusioninretreatment
_version_ 1756404534100361216