Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods

This study compared the mandibular displacement from three methods of centric relation record using an anterior jig associated with (A) chin point guidance, (B) swallowing (control group) and (C) bimanual manipulation. Ten patients aged 25-39 years were selected if they met the following inclusion criteria: complete dentition (up to the second molars), Angle class I and absence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and diagnostic casts showing stability in the maximum intercuspation (MI) position. Impressions of maxillary and mandibular arches were made with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Master casts of each patient were obtained, mounted on a microscope table in MI as a reference position and 5 records of each method were made per patient. The mandibular casts were then repositioned with records interposed and new measurements were obtained. The difference between the two readings allowed measuring the displacement of the mandible in the anteroposterior and lateral axes. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. There was no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the three methods for measuring lateral displacement (A=0.38 ± 0.26, B=0.32 ± 0.25 and C=0.32 ± 0.23). For the anteroposterior displacement (A=2.76 ± 1.43, B=2.46 ± 1.48 and C=2.97 ± 1.51), the swallowing method (B) differed significantly from the others (p<0.05), but no significant difference (p>0.05) was found between chin point guidance (A) and bimanual manipulation (C). In conclusion, the swallowing method produced smaller mandibular posterior displacement than the other methods.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alvarez,Márcia Cristina, Turbino,Miriam Lacale, Barros,Celso de, Pagnano,Valéria Oliveira, Bezzon,Osvaldo Luiz
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2009
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000100014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402009000100014
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020090001000142009-05-21Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methodsAlvarez,Márcia CristinaTurbino,Miriam LacaleBarros,Celso dePagnano,Valéria OliveiraBezzon,Osvaldo Luiz centric relation chin point guidance swallowing bimanual manipulation This study compared the mandibular displacement from three methods of centric relation record using an anterior jig associated with (A) chin point guidance, (B) swallowing (control group) and (C) bimanual manipulation. Ten patients aged 25-39 years were selected if they met the following inclusion criteria: complete dentition (up to the second molars), Angle class I and absence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and diagnostic casts showing stability in the maximum intercuspation (MI) position. Impressions of maxillary and mandibular arches were made with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Master casts of each patient were obtained, mounted on a microscope table in MI as a reference position and 5 records of each method were made per patient. The mandibular casts were then repositioned with records interposed and new measurements were obtained. The difference between the two readings allowed measuring the displacement of the mandible in the anteroposterior and lateral axes. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. There was no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the three methods for measuring lateral displacement (A=0.38 ± 0.26, B=0.32 ± 0.25 and C=0.32 ± 0.23). For the anteroposterior displacement (A=2.76 ± 1.43, B=2.46 ± 1.48 and C=2.97 ± 1.51), the swallowing method (B) differed significantly from the others (p<0.05), but no significant difference (p>0.05) was found between chin point guidance (A) and bimanual manipulation (C). In conclusion, the swallowing method produced smaller mandibular posterior displacement than the other methods.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.20 n.1 20092009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000100014en10.1590/S0103-64402009000100014
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Alvarez,Márcia Cristina
Turbino,Miriam Lacale
Barros,Celso de
Pagnano,Valéria Oliveira
Bezzon,Osvaldo Luiz
spellingShingle Alvarez,Márcia Cristina
Turbino,Miriam Lacale
Barros,Celso de
Pagnano,Valéria Oliveira
Bezzon,Osvaldo Luiz
Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods
author_facet Alvarez,Márcia Cristina
Turbino,Miriam Lacale
Barros,Celso de
Pagnano,Valéria Oliveira
Bezzon,Osvaldo Luiz
author_sort Alvarez,Márcia Cristina
title Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods
title_short Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods
title_full Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods
title_fullStr Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods
title_sort comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods
description This study compared the mandibular displacement from three methods of centric relation record using an anterior jig associated with (A) chin point guidance, (B) swallowing (control group) and (C) bimanual manipulation. Ten patients aged 25-39 years were selected if they met the following inclusion criteria: complete dentition (up to the second molars), Angle class I and absence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and diagnostic casts showing stability in the maximum intercuspation (MI) position. Impressions of maxillary and mandibular arches were made with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Master casts of each patient were obtained, mounted on a microscope table in MI as a reference position and 5 records of each method were made per patient. The mandibular casts were then repositioned with records interposed and new measurements were obtained. The difference between the two readings allowed measuring the displacement of the mandible in the anteroposterior and lateral axes. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. There was no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the three methods for measuring lateral displacement (A=0.38 ± 0.26, B=0.32 ± 0.25 and C=0.32 ± 0.23). For the anteroposterior displacement (A=2.76 ± 1.43, B=2.46 ± 1.48 and C=2.97 ± 1.51), the swallowing method (B) differed significantly from the others (p<0.05), but no significant difference (p>0.05) was found between chin point guidance (A) and bimanual manipulation (C). In conclusion, the swallowing method produced smaller mandibular posterior displacement than the other methods.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000100014
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarezmarciacristina comparativestudyofintermaxillaryrelationshipsofmanualandswallowingmethods
AT turbinomiriamlacale comparativestudyofintermaxillaryrelationshipsofmanualandswallowingmethods
AT barroscelsode comparativestudyofintermaxillaryrelationshipsofmanualandswallowingmethods
AT pagnanovaleriaoliveira comparativestudyofintermaxillaryrelationshipsofmanualandswallowingmethods
AT bezzonosvaldoluiz comparativestudyofintermaxillaryrelationshipsofmanualandswallowingmethods
_version_ 1756404472080236544