Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface defect produced by hand curettes and ultrasonic tips with different power settings. Forty root surfaces were divided into 4 groups according the treatment: Gracey curettes, ultrasonic scaler at 10% power, ultrasonic scaler at 50% power and ultrasonic scaler at 100% power. Each specimen was instrumented with 15 strokes and the and divided in the middle to evaluate: (1) the defect depth produced by the instrumentation and (2) contact area of the instrument tips, which was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. ANOVA and Tukey's test were used for statistical analysis (a=0.05). The results (mean ± SD) of the contact area showed significantly greater defects (p<0.05) for the hand instrumented groups (2092.9 ± 482) compared to the ultrasonic groups (606.8 ± 283.0; 858.6 ± 422.5; 1212.0 ± 366.7, respectively), independently of the power setting. The values for the defect depth on root surface showed no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between hand instrumentation (66.1 ± 34.0) and ultrasonic scaling at 10%, 50% or 100% power settings (52.4 ± 22.1; 72.0 ± 29.9; 77.7 ± 37.7, respectively). The findings of this study demonstrate that ultrasonic instrumentation produced a similar defect depth to that of hand instrumentation, with a smaller tip contact area, independently of the power setting used for scaling.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Casarin,Renato Corrêa Viana, Ribeiro,Fernanda Vieira, Sallum,Antonio Wilson, Sallum,Enilson Antonio, Nociti-Jr,Francisco Humberto, Casati,Márcio Zaffalon
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2009
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000100010
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402009000100010
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020090001000102009-05-21Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro studyCasarin,Renato Corrêa VianaRibeiro,Fernanda VieiraSallum,Antonio WilsonSallum,Enilson AntonioNociti-Jr,Francisco HumbertoCasati,Márcio Zaffalon ultrasonics root scaling root planing power The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface defect produced by hand curettes and ultrasonic tips with different power settings. Forty root surfaces were divided into 4 groups according the treatment: Gracey curettes, ultrasonic scaler at 10% power, ultrasonic scaler at 50% power and ultrasonic scaler at 100% power. Each specimen was instrumented with 15 strokes and the and divided in the middle to evaluate: (1) the defect depth produced by the instrumentation and (2) contact area of the instrument tips, which was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. ANOVA and Tukey's test were used for statistical analysis (a=0.05). The results (mean ± SD) of the contact area showed significantly greater defects (p<0.05) for the hand instrumented groups (2092.9 ± 482) compared to the ultrasonic groups (606.8 ± 283.0; 858.6 ± 422.5; 1212.0 ± 366.7, respectively), independently of the power setting. The values for the defect depth on root surface showed no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between hand instrumentation (66.1 ± 34.0) and ultrasonic scaling at 10%, 50% or 100% power settings (52.4 ± 22.1; 72.0 ± 29.9; 77.7 ± 37.7, respectively). The findings of this study demonstrate that ultrasonic instrumentation produced a similar defect depth to that of hand instrumentation, with a smaller tip contact area, independently of the power setting used for scaling.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.20 n.1 20092009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000100010en10.1590/S0103-64402009000100010
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Casarin,Renato Corrêa Viana
Ribeiro,Fernanda Vieira
Sallum,Antonio Wilson
Sallum,Enilson Antonio
Nociti-Jr,Francisco Humberto
Casati,Márcio Zaffalon
spellingShingle Casarin,Renato Corrêa Viana
Ribeiro,Fernanda Vieira
Sallum,Antonio Wilson
Sallum,Enilson Antonio
Nociti-Jr,Francisco Humberto
Casati,Márcio Zaffalon
Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study
author_facet Casarin,Renato Corrêa Viana
Ribeiro,Fernanda Vieira
Sallum,Antonio Wilson
Sallum,Enilson Antonio
Nociti-Jr,Francisco Humberto
Casati,Márcio Zaffalon
author_sort Casarin,Renato Corrêa Viana
title Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study
title_short Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study
title_full Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study
title_sort root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface defect produced by hand curettes and ultrasonic tips with different power settings. Forty root surfaces were divided into 4 groups according the treatment: Gracey curettes, ultrasonic scaler at 10% power, ultrasonic scaler at 50% power and ultrasonic scaler at 100% power. Each specimen was instrumented with 15 strokes and the and divided in the middle to evaluate: (1) the defect depth produced by the instrumentation and (2) contact area of the instrument tips, which was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. ANOVA and Tukey's test were used for statistical analysis (a=0.05). The results (mean ± SD) of the contact area showed significantly greater defects (p<0.05) for the hand instrumented groups (2092.9 ± 482) compared to the ultrasonic groups (606.8 ± 283.0; 858.6 ± 422.5; 1212.0 ± 366.7, respectively), independently of the power setting. The values for the defect depth on root surface showed no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between hand instrumentation (66.1 ± 34.0) and ultrasonic scaling at 10%, 50% or 100% power settings (52.4 ± 22.1; 72.0 ± 29.9; 77.7 ± 37.7, respectively). The findings of this study demonstrate that ultrasonic instrumentation produced a similar defect depth to that of hand instrumentation, with a smaller tip contact area, independently of the power setting used for scaling.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000100010
work_keys_str_mv AT casarinrenatocorreaviana rootsurfacedefectproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalerwithdifferentpowersettingsaninvitrostudy
AT ribeirofernandavieira rootsurfacedefectproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalerwithdifferentpowersettingsaninvitrostudy
AT sallumantoniowilson rootsurfacedefectproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalerwithdifferentpowersettingsaninvitrostudy
AT sallumenilsonantonio rootsurfacedefectproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalerwithdifferentpowersettingsaninvitrostudy
AT nocitijrfranciscohumberto rootsurfacedefectproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalerwithdifferentpowersettingsaninvitrostudy
AT casatimarciozaffalon rootsurfacedefectproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalerwithdifferentpowersettingsaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1756404471530782720