Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer

This study evaluated the effect of flowable composite resin application on the microtensile bond strength (muTBS) of adhesive systems to dentin. Occlusal surfaces of human third molars were ground to obtain flat dentin surfaces. The crown of each tooth was sectioned occluso-gingivally into four quarters with a water-cooled diamond saw. One of the following adhesive systems was applied to dentin surface in each quarter of the same tooth, following manufacturers' instructions: Scotchbond Multipurpose, Single Bond Adper Prompt and Clearfil SE Bond. Experimental and control groups received the same treatment, except for the fact that a layer of flowable composite (Filtek Flow) was placed and light-cured on top of the adhesive layer in the specimens of the experimental groups. Resin composite (Filtek Z250) crown buildups were then made on the bonded surfaces and incrementally light-cured for 20 s. The restored teeth were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 h. Each tooth quarter was serially cut in a longitudinal direction in order to obtain several bonded sticks (0.9-mm² in cross-section). Maximal microtensile stress (in MPa) at failure was recorded using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. Placement of a low-viscosity resin to the hybridized dentin increased the muTBS for all tested adhesive systems. However, such increase was significant only for Clearfil SE Bond (p<0.05). When the restorations were placed without low-viscosity resin, Clearfil SE Bond presented higher muTBS than Adper Prompt (p<0.05). For the groups treated with flowable composite, Clearfil SE Bond produced the highest muTBS means to dentin. In conclusion, the effect of the addition of an intermediate flowable composite layer on muTBS to dentin was material-dependent and resulted in an increased adhesion for all tested materials, though with significance only for Clearfil SE Bond.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: De Goes,Mario Fernando, Giannini,Marcelo, Di Hipólito,Vinícius, Carrilho,Marcela Rocha de Oliveira, Daronch,Márcia, Rueggeberg,Frederick Allen
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2008
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402008000100009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402008000100009
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020080001000092008-04-22Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layerDe Goes,Mario FernandoGiannini,MarceloDi Hipólito,ViníciusCarrilho,Marcela Rocha de OliveiraDaronch,MárciaRueggeberg,Frederick Allen dentin adhesive system bond strength composite resin This study evaluated the effect of flowable composite resin application on the microtensile bond strength (muTBS) of adhesive systems to dentin. Occlusal surfaces of human third molars were ground to obtain flat dentin surfaces. The crown of each tooth was sectioned occluso-gingivally into four quarters with a water-cooled diamond saw. One of the following adhesive systems was applied to dentin surface in each quarter of the same tooth, following manufacturers' instructions: Scotchbond Multipurpose, Single Bond Adper Prompt and Clearfil SE Bond. Experimental and control groups received the same treatment, except for the fact that a layer of flowable composite (Filtek Flow) was placed and light-cured on top of the adhesive layer in the specimens of the experimental groups. Resin composite (Filtek Z250) crown buildups were then made on the bonded surfaces and incrementally light-cured for 20 s. The restored teeth were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 h. Each tooth quarter was serially cut in a longitudinal direction in order to obtain several bonded sticks (0.9-mm² in cross-section). Maximal microtensile stress (in MPa) at failure was recorded using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. Placement of a low-viscosity resin to the hybridized dentin increased the muTBS for all tested adhesive systems. However, such increase was significant only for Clearfil SE Bond (p<0.05). When the restorations were placed without low-viscosity resin, Clearfil SE Bond presented higher muTBS than Adper Prompt (p<0.05). For the groups treated with flowable composite, Clearfil SE Bond produced the highest muTBS means to dentin. In conclusion, the effect of the addition of an intermediate flowable composite layer on muTBS to dentin was material-dependent and resulted in an increased adhesion for all tested materials, though with significance only for Clearfil SE Bond.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.19 n.1 20082008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402008000100009en10.1590/S0103-64402008000100009
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author De Goes,Mario Fernando
Giannini,Marcelo
Di Hipólito,Vinícius
Carrilho,Marcela Rocha de Oliveira
Daronch,Márcia
Rueggeberg,Frederick Allen
spellingShingle De Goes,Mario Fernando
Giannini,Marcelo
Di Hipólito,Vinícius
Carrilho,Marcela Rocha de Oliveira
Daronch,Márcia
Rueggeberg,Frederick Allen
Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer
author_facet De Goes,Mario Fernando
Giannini,Marcelo
Di Hipólito,Vinícius
Carrilho,Marcela Rocha de Oliveira
Daronch,Márcia
Rueggeberg,Frederick Allen
author_sort De Goes,Mario Fernando
title Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer
title_short Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer
title_full Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer
title_fullStr Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer
title_full_unstemmed Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer
title_sort microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer
description This study evaluated the effect of flowable composite resin application on the microtensile bond strength (muTBS) of adhesive systems to dentin. Occlusal surfaces of human third molars were ground to obtain flat dentin surfaces. The crown of each tooth was sectioned occluso-gingivally into four quarters with a water-cooled diamond saw. One of the following adhesive systems was applied to dentin surface in each quarter of the same tooth, following manufacturers' instructions: Scotchbond Multipurpose, Single Bond Adper Prompt and Clearfil SE Bond. Experimental and control groups received the same treatment, except for the fact that a layer of flowable composite (Filtek Flow) was placed and light-cured on top of the adhesive layer in the specimens of the experimental groups. Resin composite (Filtek Z250) crown buildups were then made on the bonded surfaces and incrementally light-cured for 20 s. The restored teeth were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 h. Each tooth quarter was serially cut in a longitudinal direction in order to obtain several bonded sticks (0.9-mm² in cross-section). Maximal microtensile stress (in MPa) at failure was recorded using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. Placement of a low-viscosity resin to the hybridized dentin increased the muTBS for all tested adhesive systems. However, such increase was significant only for Clearfil SE Bond (p<0.05). When the restorations were placed without low-viscosity resin, Clearfil SE Bond presented higher muTBS than Adper Prompt (p<0.05). For the groups treated with flowable composite, Clearfil SE Bond produced the highest muTBS means to dentin. In conclusion, the effect of the addition of an intermediate flowable composite layer on muTBS to dentin was material-dependent and resulted in an increased adhesion for all tested materials, though with significance only for Clearfil SE Bond.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402008000100009
work_keys_str_mv AT degoesmariofernando microtensilebondstrengthofadhesivesystemstodentinwithorwithoutapplicationofanintermediateflowableresinlayer
AT gianninimarcelo microtensilebondstrengthofadhesivesystemstodentinwithorwithoutapplicationofanintermediateflowableresinlayer
AT dihipolitovinicius microtensilebondstrengthofadhesivesystemstodentinwithorwithoutapplicationofanintermediateflowableresinlayer
AT carrilhomarcelarochadeoliveira microtensilebondstrengthofadhesivesystemstodentinwithorwithoutapplicationofanintermediateflowableresinlayer
AT daronchmarcia microtensilebondstrengthofadhesivesystemstodentinwithorwithoutapplicationofanintermediateflowableresinlayer
AT rueggebergfrederickallen microtensilebondstrengthofadhesivesystemstodentinwithorwithoutapplicationofanintermediateflowableresinlayer
_version_ 1756404462898905088