Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
The aim of this study was to assess the tensile bond strength of four adhesive systems to enamel and dentin: Clearfil Liner Bond 2V - C, Prime&Bond NT/NRC - PB, Single Bond - SB and All Bond 2 -AB. For such purpose, 40 sound human molars were selected. Crowns were bisected in a mesiodistal direction and each half was ground until flat enamel (E) or dentin (D) surfaces were obtained. A total of 80 specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=20, 10 in enamel and 10 in dentin). After surface treatment, a composite resin (Z250; 3M) cone was prepared using a split Teflon® matrix. Bond strength was tested in an universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Bond strength means in MPa were: C - E: 18.66 (±2.67) and D: 21.62 (±5.29); PB - E: 18.13 (±2.96) and D: 3.19 (±1.40); SB - E: 20.06 (±6.11) and D: 16.95 (±2.57); AB - E: 18.20 (±3.94) and D: 15.94 (±4.72). Statistical analysis of data by two-way ANOVA showed that C presented the best results followed by SB. In conclusion, among the tested materials, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V self-etching primer adhesive syetem had the best performance. The substrate type influenced bond strength, being higher to enamel.
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
2007
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000200007 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402007000200007 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0103-644020070002000072007-10-25Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentinSouza-Zaroni,Wanessa ChristineSeixas,Letícia CalientoCiccone-Nogueira,Juliane CristinaChimello,Daniela ThomazattiPalma-Dibb,Regina Guenka bond strength enamel dentin adhesive systems The aim of this study was to assess the tensile bond strength of four adhesive systems to enamel and dentin: Clearfil Liner Bond 2V - C, Prime&Bond NT/NRC - PB, Single Bond - SB and All Bond 2 -AB. For such purpose, 40 sound human molars were selected. Crowns were bisected in a mesiodistal direction and each half was ground until flat enamel (E) or dentin (D) surfaces were obtained. A total of 80 specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=20, 10 in enamel and 10 in dentin). After surface treatment, a composite resin (Z250; 3M) cone was prepared using a split Teflon® matrix. Bond strength was tested in an universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Bond strength means in MPa were: C - E: 18.66 (±2.67) and D: 21.62 (±5.29); PB - E: 18.13 (±2.96) and D: 3.19 (±1.40); SB - E: 20.06 (±6.11) and D: 16.95 (±2.57); AB - E: 18.20 (±3.94) and D: 15.94 (±4.72). Statistical analysis of data by two-way ANOVA showed that C presented the best results followed by SB. In conclusion, among the tested materials, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V self-etching primer adhesive syetem had the best performance. The substrate type influenced bond strength, being higher to enamel.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.18 n.2 20072007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000200007en10.1590/S0103-64402007000200007 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine Seixas,Letícia Caliento Ciccone-Nogueira,Juliane Cristina Chimello,Daniela Thomazatti Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka |
spellingShingle |
Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine Seixas,Letícia Caliento Ciccone-Nogueira,Juliane Cristina Chimello,Daniela Thomazatti Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin |
author_facet |
Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine Seixas,Letícia Caliento Ciccone-Nogueira,Juliane Cristina Chimello,Daniela Thomazatti Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka |
author_sort |
Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine |
title |
Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin |
title_short |
Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin |
title_full |
Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin |
title_fullStr |
Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin |
title_sort |
tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin |
description |
The aim of this study was to assess the tensile bond strength of four adhesive systems to enamel and dentin: Clearfil Liner Bond 2V - C, Prime&Bond NT/NRC - PB, Single Bond - SB and All Bond 2 -AB. For such purpose, 40 sound human molars were selected. Crowns were bisected in a mesiodistal direction and each half was ground until flat enamel (E) or dentin (D) surfaces were obtained. A total of 80 specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=20, 10 in enamel and 10 in dentin). After surface treatment, a composite resin (Z250; 3M) cone was prepared using a split Teflon® matrix. Bond strength was tested in an universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Bond strength means in MPa were: C - E: 18.66 (±2.67) and D: 21.62 (±5.29); PB - E: 18.13 (±2.96) and D: 3.19 (±1.40); SB - E: 20.06 (±6.11) and D: 16.95 (±2.57); AB - E: 18.20 (±3.94) and D: 15.94 (±4.72). Statistical analysis of data by two-way ANOVA showed that C presented the best results followed by SB. In conclusion, among the tested materials, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V self-etching primer adhesive syetem had the best performance. The substrate type influenced bond strength, being higher to enamel. |
publisher |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000200007 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT souzazaroniwanessachristine tensilebondstrengthofdifferentadhesivesystemstoenamelanddentin AT seixasleticiacaliento tensilebondstrengthofdifferentadhesivesystemstoenamelanddentin AT cicconenogueirajulianecristina tensilebondstrengthofdifferentadhesivesystemstoenamelanddentin AT chimellodanielathomazatti tensilebondstrengthofdifferentadhesivesystemstoenamelanddentin AT palmadibbreginaguenka tensilebondstrengthofdifferentadhesivesystemstoenamelanddentin |
_version_ |
1756404456125104128 |