Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units

This study compared the abrasion resistance of direct composite resins cured by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units. Twenty specimens (12 mm in diameter; 1.0 mm thick) of each composite resin [TPH (Dentsply); Definite (Degussa); Charisma (Heraus Kulzer)] were prepared using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix. Ten specimens per material were cured with the LED source and 10 with the halogen lamp for 40 s. The resin discs were polished, submitted to initial surface roughness reading (Ra initial - mum) in a roughness tester and stored in water at 37°C for 15 days. The specimens were weighed (M1) and submitted to simulated toothbrushing using slurry of water and dentifrice with high abrasiveness. After 100 minutes in the toothbrushing simulator, the specimens were cleaned, submitted to a new surface roughness reading (Ra final - mum) and reweighed (M2). Mass loss was determined as the difference between M1 and M2. Data were recorded and analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Tukey Test at 5% significance level. The composite resin with greater size of inorganic fillers (TPH) showed the lowest mass loss and surface roughness means, indicating a higher resistance to toothbrush abrasion (p<0.05). Definite cured with LED presented the least resistance to toothbrush abrasion, showing the highest means of surface roughness and mass loss (p<0.05). The LED source did not show the same effectiveness as the halogen lamp for polymerizing this specific composite resin. When the composite resins were cured a halogen LCU, no statistically significant difference was observed among the materials (p>0.05). It may be concluded that the type of light-curing unit and the resin composition seemed to interfere with the materials' resistance to abrasion.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martinelli,Janisse, Pires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri, Casemiro,Luciana Assirati, Tirapelli,Camila, Panzer,Heitor
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2006
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000100007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402006000100007
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020060001000072006-05-02Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing unitsMartinelli,JanissePires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho PanzeriCasemiro,Luciana AssiratiTirapelli,CamilaPanzer,Heitor abrasion resistance composite resin light-curing LED halogen lamp This study compared the abrasion resistance of direct composite resins cured by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units. Twenty specimens (12 mm in diameter; 1.0 mm thick) of each composite resin [TPH (Dentsply); Definite (Degussa); Charisma (Heraus Kulzer)] were prepared using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix. Ten specimens per material were cured with the LED source and 10 with the halogen lamp for 40 s. The resin discs were polished, submitted to initial surface roughness reading (Ra initial - mum) in a roughness tester and stored in water at 37°C for 15 days. The specimens were weighed (M1) and submitted to simulated toothbrushing using slurry of water and dentifrice with high abrasiveness. After 100 minutes in the toothbrushing simulator, the specimens were cleaned, submitted to a new surface roughness reading (Ra final - mum) and reweighed (M2). Mass loss was determined as the difference between M1 and M2. Data were recorded and analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Tukey Test at 5% significance level. The composite resin with greater size of inorganic fillers (TPH) showed the lowest mass loss and surface roughness means, indicating a higher resistance to toothbrush abrasion (p<0.05). Definite cured with LED presented the least resistance to toothbrush abrasion, showing the highest means of surface roughness and mass loss (p<0.05). The LED source did not show the same effectiveness as the halogen lamp for polymerizing this specific composite resin. When the composite resins were cured a halogen LCU, no statistically significant difference was observed among the materials (p>0.05). It may be concluded that the type of light-curing unit and the resin composition seemed to interfere with the materials' resistance to abrasion.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.17 n.1 20062006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000100007en10.1590/S0103-64402006000100007
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Martinelli,Janisse
Pires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri
Casemiro,Luciana Assirati
Tirapelli,Camila
Panzer,Heitor
spellingShingle Martinelli,Janisse
Pires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri
Casemiro,Luciana Assirati
Tirapelli,Camila
Panzer,Heitor
Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units
author_facet Martinelli,Janisse
Pires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri
Casemiro,Luciana Assirati
Tirapelli,Camila
Panzer,Heitor
author_sort Martinelli,Janisse
title Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units
title_short Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units
title_full Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units
title_fullStr Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units
title_full_unstemmed Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units
title_sort abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (led) and halogen light-curing units
description This study compared the abrasion resistance of direct composite resins cured by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units. Twenty specimens (12 mm in diameter; 1.0 mm thick) of each composite resin [TPH (Dentsply); Definite (Degussa); Charisma (Heraus Kulzer)] were prepared using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix. Ten specimens per material were cured with the LED source and 10 with the halogen lamp for 40 s. The resin discs were polished, submitted to initial surface roughness reading (Ra initial - mum) in a roughness tester and stored in water at 37°C for 15 days. The specimens were weighed (M1) and submitted to simulated toothbrushing using slurry of water and dentifrice with high abrasiveness. After 100 minutes in the toothbrushing simulator, the specimens were cleaned, submitted to a new surface roughness reading (Ra final - mum) and reweighed (M2). Mass loss was determined as the difference between M1 and M2. Data were recorded and analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Tukey Test at 5% significance level. The composite resin with greater size of inorganic fillers (TPH) showed the lowest mass loss and surface roughness means, indicating a higher resistance to toothbrush abrasion (p<0.05). Definite cured with LED presented the least resistance to toothbrush abrasion, showing the highest means of surface roughness and mass loss (p<0.05). The LED source did not show the same effectiveness as the halogen lamp for polymerizing this specific composite resin. When the composite resins were cured a halogen LCU, no statistically significant difference was observed among the materials (p>0.05). It may be concluded that the type of light-curing unit and the resin composition seemed to interfere with the materials' resistance to abrasion.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000100007
work_keys_str_mv AT martinellijanisse abrasionresistanceofcompositespolymerizedbylightemittingdiodesledandhalogenlightcuringunits
AT piresdesouzafernandadecarvalhopanzeri abrasionresistanceofcompositespolymerizedbylightemittingdiodesledandhalogenlightcuringunits
AT casemirolucianaassirati abrasionresistanceofcompositespolymerizedbylightemittingdiodesledandhalogenlightcuringunits
AT tirapellicamila abrasionresistanceofcompositespolymerizedbylightemittingdiodesledandhalogenlightcuringunits
AT panzerheitor abrasionresistanceofcompositespolymerizedbylightemittingdiodesledandhalogenlightcuringunits
_version_ 1756404444313944064