Validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individuals

Abstract Introduction: Spine problems are common, and assessment of spine flexibility provides relevant information; however, alternative evaluation methods need to be validated. Objective: To evaluate the concurrent validity of the Flexicurve using 3D videogrammetry as a reference value to assess spinal flexion and extension in the lumbar and thoracic regions. Method: The consecutive sample consisted of 39 individuals aged between 18 and 50 years. Two consecutive evaluations were performed by the same rater on the same day and at the same location: (1) Flexicurve and (2) 3D videogrammetry. The assessments were performed with the spine in the neutral position, followed by maximum flexion and extension. The range of motion (ROM) in the maximum flexion and extension positions was calculated in MATLAB® and defined as the difference between the maximum flexion or extension angle and that of the neutral position. Statistical analyses used were the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation coefficient, RMS error and Bland-Altman plot (α < 0.05). Results: The ROM between instruments was similar, with high correlations for thoracic flexion (r = 0.751), extension (r = 0.814) and lumbar flexion (r = 0.853), and RMS errors under 8°. The correlation for lumbar extension was moderate (r = 0.613) and the RMS error was more than 10°. The limits of agreement varied between ± 10º and ± 21º. Conclusion: The Flexicurve is valid for assessing maximum flexion and extension of the thoracic spine, and maximum flexion of the lumbar spine. We suggest caution in evaluating the maximum extension of the lumbar spine.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valle,Marja Bochehin do, Dutra,Vinícius Hoffmann, Candotti,Cláudia Tarragô, Sedrez,Juliana Adami, Wagner Neto,Edgar Santiago, Loss,Jefferson Fagundes
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-51502020000100215
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-51502020000100215
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-515020200001002152020-02-13Validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individualsValle,Marja Bochehin doDutra,Vinícius HoffmannCandotti,Cláudia TarragôSedrez,Juliana AdamiWagner Neto,Edgar SantiagoLoss,Jefferson Fagundes Validation Studies Measurement Equipment Pliability Spine Abstract Introduction: Spine problems are common, and assessment of spine flexibility provides relevant information; however, alternative evaluation methods need to be validated. Objective: To evaluate the concurrent validity of the Flexicurve using 3D videogrammetry as a reference value to assess spinal flexion and extension in the lumbar and thoracic regions. Method: The consecutive sample consisted of 39 individuals aged between 18 and 50 years. Two consecutive evaluations were performed by the same rater on the same day and at the same location: (1) Flexicurve and (2) 3D videogrammetry. The assessments were performed with the spine in the neutral position, followed by maximum flexion and extension. The range of motion (ROM) in the maximum flexion and extension positions was calculated in MATLAB® and defined as the difference between the maximum flexion or extension angle and that of the neutral position. Statistical analyses used were the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation coefficient, RMS error and Bland-Altman plot (α < 0.05). Results: The ROM between instruments was similar, with high correlations for thoracic flexion (r = 0.751), extension (r = 0.814) and lumbar flexion (r = 0.853), and RMS errors under 8°. The correlation for lumbar extension was moderate (r = 0.613) and the RMS error was more than 10°. The limits of agreement varied between ± 10º and ± 21º. Conclusion: The Flexicurve is valid for assessing maximum flexion and extension of the thoracic spine, and maximum flexion of the lumbar spine. We suggest caution in evaluating the maximum extension of the lumbar spine.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontifícia Universidade Católica do ParanáFisioterapia em Movimento v.33 20202020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-51502020000100215en10.1590/1980-5918.033.ao14
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Valle,Marja Bochehin do
Dutra,Vinícius Hoffmann
Candotti,Cláudia Tarragô
Sedrez,Juliana Adami
Wagner Neto,Edgar Santiago
Loss,Jefferson Fagundes
spellingShingle Valle,Marja Bochehin do
Dutra,Vinícius Hoffmann
Candotti,Cláudia Tarragô
Sedrez,Juliana Adami
Wagner Neto,Edgar Santiago
Loss,Jefferson Fagundes
Validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individuals
author_facet Valle,Marja Bochehin do
Dutra,Vinícius Hoffmann
Candotti,Cláudia Tarragô
Sedrez,Juliana Adami
Wagner Neto,Edgar Santiago
Loss,Jefferson Fagundes
author_sort Valle,Marja Bochehin do
title Validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individuals
title_short Validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individuals
title_full Validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individuals
title_fullStr Validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individuals
title_full_unstemmed Validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individuals
title_sort validity of flexicurve for the assessment of spinal flexibility in asymptomatic individuals
description Abstract Introduction: Spine problems are common, and assessment of spine flexibility provides relevant information; however, alternative evaluation methods need to be validated. Objective: To evaluate the concurrent validity of the Flexicurve using 3D videogrammetry as a reference value to assess spinal flexion and extension in the lumbar and thoracic regions. Method: The consecutive sample consisted of 39 individuals aged between 18 and 50 years. Two consecutive evaluations were performed by the same rater on the same day and at the same location: (1) Flexicurve and (2) 3D videogrammetry. The assessments were performed with the spine in the neutral position, followed by maximum flexion and extension. The range of motion (ROM) in the maximum flexion and extension positions was calculated in MATLAB® and defined as the difference between the maximum flexion or extension angle and that of the neutral position. Statistical analyses used were the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation coefficient, RMS error and Bland-Altman plot (α < 0.05). Results: The ROM between instruments was similar, with high correlations for thoracic flexion (r = 0.751), extension (r = 0.814) and lumbar flexion (r = 0.853), and RMS errors under 8°. The correlation for lumbar extension was moderate (r = 0.613) and the RMS error was more than 10°. The limits of agreement varied between ± 10º and ± 21º. Conclusion: The Flexicurve is valid for assessing maximum flexion and extension of the thoracic spine, and maximum flexion of the lumbar spine. We suggest caution in evaluating the maximum extension of the lumbar spine.
publisher Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-51502020000100215
work_keys_str_mv AT vallemarjabochehindo validityofflexicurvefortheassessmentofspinalflexibilityinasymptomaticindividuals
AT dutraviniciushoffmann validityofflexicurvefortheassessmentofspinalflexibilityinasymptomaticindividuals
AT candotticlaudiatarrago validityofflexicurvefortheassessmentofspinalflexibilityinasymptomaticindividuals
AT sedrezjulianaadami validityofflexicurvefortheassessmentofspinalflexibilityinasymptomaticindividuals
AT wagnernetoedgarsantiago validityofflexicurvefortheassessmentofspinalflexibilityinasymptomaticindividuals
AT lossjeffersonfagundes validityofflexicurvefortheassessmentofspinalflexibilityinasymptomaticindividuals
_version_ 1756404175713861632