NASF's tools and practices in health of physical therapists

Abstract Introduction: With the creation of the Support Center for Family Health (NASF) and the high insertion of physiotherapists in this, it is necessary to have a better knowledge on this category's current work. Objective: To analyze the process of work of physiotherapists at NASF and their education, and the technological tools usage. Methods: Transversal study, descriptive, analytic, enforced by online semi-structured questionnaires to NASF's physiotherapists in Mato Grosso do Sul. The results were analyzed through descriptive statistics and chi-square test (significant level of 5%). Results: 37 physiotherapists (21 cities) participated. Among them, 27% Family-Health/Primary-Health-Care post graduates, and 51.4% in other clinical areas. Most (91,9%) did not receive enough capacitation when joining NASF, and 94.6% consider that did not have enough knowledge to do their activities. The articulation NASF and Family-Health-Strategy team is considered unsatisfactory to 51.3%. Individual rehabilitation is the most carried activity on a daily basis (59.5%), and NASF's tools are used by less than half, except the Amplified Clinic, which is used by 54,1% of physiotherapists. There was a significant association between capacitation to NASF's work and the tools usage of Singular-Therapeutic Project, Territorial Health Project and Support Pact. There was no association between the tools usage and the specialization in Family Health. Conclusion: The assistive and rehabilitator model has been the conductor of physiotherapists' actions. NASF's tools are little used. These results are explained due to the limited knowledge about NASF's attributions, resulting from the small capacitation offer to these activities and the traditional rehabilitator education.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernandes,Janainny Magalhães, Rios,Talita Abi, Sanches,Vinicius Santos, Santos,Mara Lisiane de Moraes dos
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-51502016000400741
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-51502016000400741
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-515020160004007412016-11-21NASF's tools and practices in health of physical therapistsFernandes,Janainny MagalhãesRios,Talita AbiSanches,Vinicius SantosSantos,Mara Lisiane de Moraes dos Physical Therapy Primary Health Care Family Health Abstract Introduction: With the creation of the Support Center for Family Health (NASF) and the high insertion of physiotherapists in this, it is necessary to have a better knowledge on this category's current work. Objective: To analyze the process of work of physiotherapists at NASF and their education, and the technological tools usage. Methods: Transversal study, descriptive, analytic, enforced by online semi-structured questionnaires to NASF's physiotherapists in Mato Grosso do Sul. The results were analyzed through descriptive statistics and chi-square test (significant level of 5%). Results: 37 physiotherapists (21 cities) participated. Among them, 27% Family-Health/Primary-Health-Care post graduates, and 51.4% in other clinical areas. Most (91,9%) did not receive enough capacitation when joining NASF, and 94.6% consider that did not have enough knowledge to do their activities. The articulation NASF and Family-Health-Strategy team is considered unsatisfactory to 51.3%. Individual rehabilitation is the most carried activity on a daily basis (59.5%), and NASF's tools are used by less than half, except the Amplified Clinic, which is used by 54,1% of physiotherapists. There was a significant association between capacitation to NASF's work and the tools usage of Singular-Therapeutic Project, Territorial Health Project and Support Pact. There was no association between the tools usage and the specialization in Family Health. Conclusion: The assistive and rehabilitator model has been the conductor of physiotherapists' actions. NASF's tools are little used. These results are explained due to the limited knowledge about NASF's attributions, resulting from the small capacitation offer to these activities and the traditional rehabilitator education.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontifícia Universidade Católica do ParanáFisioterapia em Movimento v.29 n.4 20162016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-51502016000400741en10.1590/1980-5918.029.004.ao10
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Fernandes,Janainny Magalhães
Rios,Talita Abi
Sanches,Vinicius Santos
Santos,Mara Lisiane de Moraes dos
spellingShingle Fernandes,Janainny Magalhães
Rios,Talita Abi
Sanches,Vinicius Santos
Santos,Mara Lisiane de Moraes dos
NASF's tools and practices in health of physical therapists
author_facet Fernandes,Janainny Magalhães
Rios,Talita Abi
Sanches,Vinicius Santos
Santos,Mara Lisiane de Moraes dos
author_sort Fernandes,Janainny Magalhães
title NASF's tools and practices in health of physical therapists
title_short NASF's tools and practices in health of physical therapists
title_full NASF's tools and practices in health of physical therapists
title_fullStr NASF's tools and practices in health of physical therapists
title_full_unstemmed NASF's tools and practices in health of physical therapists
title_sort nasf's tools and practices in health of physical therapists
description Abstract Introduction: With the creation of the Support Center for Family Health (NASF) and the high insertion of physiotherapists in this, it is necessary to have a better knowledge on this category's current work. Objective: To analyze the process of work of physiotherapists at NASF and their education, and the technological tools usage. Methods: Transversal study, descriptive, analytic, enforced by online semi-structured questionnaires to NASF's physiotherapists in Mato Grosso do Sul. The results were analyzed through descriptive statistics and chi-square test (significant level of 5%). Results: 37 physiotherapists (21 cities) participated. Among them, 27% Family-Health/Primary-Health-Care post graduates, and 51.4% in other clinical areas. Most (91,9%) did not receive enough capacitation when joining NASF, and 94.6% consider that did not have enough knowledge to do their activities. The articulation NASF and Family-Health-Strategy team is considered unsatisfactory to 51.3%. Individual rehabilitation is the most carried activity on a daily basis (59.5%), and NASF's tools are used by less than half, except the Amplified Clinic, which is used by 54,1% of physiotherapists. There was a significant association between capacitation to NASF's work and the tools usage of Singular-Therapeutic Project, Territorial Health Project and Support Pact. There was no association between the tools usage and the specialization in Family Health. Conclusion: The assistive and rehabilitator model has been the conductor of physiotherapists' actions. NASF's tools are little used. These results are explained due to the limited knowledge about NASF's attributions, resulting from the small capacitation offer to these activities and the traditional rehabilitator education.
publisher Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-51502016000400741
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandesjanainnymagalhaes nasfstoolsandpracticesinhealthofphysicaltherapists
AT riostalitaabi nasfstoolsandpracticesinhealthofphysicaltherapists
AT sanchesviniciussantos nasfstoolsandpracticesinhealthofphysicaltherapists
AT santosmaralisianedemoraesdos nasfstoolsandpracticesinhealthofphysicaltherapists
_version_ 1756404142233878528