RATIONALES AND BARRIERS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC BUDGETING: A systematic literature review

Abstract: This study conducts a systematic literature review on citizen participation in public budgeting, focusing on understanding the rationales of participatory initiatives and the barriers to promoting significant change in public policies. It scrutinizes the data with a mixed-methods approach that involves conducting bibliometric and content analyses and develops analytical propositions to support future studies. The two main rationales of participatory mechanisms - political-electoral and good governance - are highlighted, and the barriers to effective citizen participation are discussed. Our findings suggest that to develop participatory innovations it is necessary to consider not only citizens’ capacities to understand public budgeting but also states’ capacities to speak citizens’ language and consider their voices. Future research may benefit from incorporating perspectives from the education field and from integrating technical and political views on public budgeting.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pereira,Diogo, Figueira,Ariane Roder
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade de Brasília. Instituto de Ciência Política 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-33522022000300201
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-33522022000300201
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-335220220003002012022-08-11RATIONALES AND BARRIERS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC BUDGETING: A systematic literature reviewPereira,DiogoFigueira,Ariane Roder public participation public budgeting SLR participatory budgeting citizen education democratic governance Abstract: This study conducts a systematic literature review on citizen participation in public budgeting, focusing on understanding the rationales of participatory initiatives and the barriers to promoting significant change in public policies. It scrutinizes the data with a mixed-methods approach that involves conducting bibliometric and content analyses and develops analytical propositions to support future studies. The two main rationales of participatory mechanisms - political-electoral and good governance - are highlighted, and the barriers to effective citizen participation are discussed. Our findings suggest that to develop participatory innovations it is necessary to consider not only citizens’ capacities to understand public budgeting but also states’ capacities to speak citizens’ language and consider their voices. Future research may benefit from incorporating perspectives from the education field and from integrating technical and political views on public budgeting.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade de Brasília. Instituto de Ciência PolíticaRevista Brasileira de Ciência Política n.39 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-33522022000300201en10.1590/0103-3352.2022.39.258470
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Pereira,Diogo
Figueira,Ariane Roder
spellingShingle Pereira,Diogo
Figueira,Ariane Roder
RATIONALES AND BARRIERS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC BUDGETING: A systematic literature review
author_facet Pereira,Diogo
Figueira,Ariane Roder
author_sort Pereira,Diogo
title RATIONALES AND BARRIERS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC BUDGETING: A systematic literature review
title_short RATIONALES AND BARRIERS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC BUDGETING: A systematic literature review
title_full RATIONALES AND BARRIERS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC BUDGETING: A systematic literature review
title_fullStr RATIONALES AND BARRIERS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC BUDGETING: A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed RATIONALES AND BARRIERS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC BUDGETING: A systematic literature review
title_sort rationales and barriers to citizen participation in public budgeting: a systematic literature review
description Abstract: This study conducts a systematic literature review on citizen participation in public budgeting, focusing on understanding the rationales of participatory initiatives and the barriers to promoting significant change in public policies. It scrutinizes the data with a mixed-methods approach that involves conducting bibliometric and content analyses and develops analytical propositions to support future studies. The two main rationales of participatory mechanisms - political-electoral and good governance - are highlighted, and the barriers to effective citizen participation are discussed. Our findings suggest that to develop participatory innovations it is necessary to consider not only citizens’ capacities to understand public budgeting but also states’ capacities to speak citizens’ language and consider their voices. Future research may benefit from incorporating perspectives from the education field and from integrating technical and political views on public budgeting.
publisher Universidade de Brasília. Instituto de Ciência Política
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-33522022000300201
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiradiogo rationalesandbarrierstocitizenparticipationinpublicbudgetingasystematicliteraturereview
AT figueiraarianeroder rationalesandbarrierstocitizenparticipationinpublicbudgetingasystematicliteraturereview
_version_ 1756402580915748864