Drones, Warfare and the Deconstruction of the Enemy

Abstract Based on the theoretical frameworks of Carl Schmitt (hostis and inimicus), Giorgio Agamben (field and homo sacer), and Grégoire Chamayou (hunter-states and kill boxes), and being seen through the theoretical lens of post-structuralism in International Relations, this article aims to analyse the use of drones, especially Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs), in the ‘War on Terror’ led by the USA. In this context, we seek to demonstrate how the use of drones has affected the logic of current warfare scenarios in three different, but related aspects. First of all (Act One), the use of drones makes the construction of political otherness of the enemy impossible, and thus identity construction by counterpoint impracticable. Then (Act Two), this paper demonstrates how there is an attempt to move the enemy to the externality of the International Community, relegating their status to banishment and marginalisation. Finally (Act Three), the authors analyse the role of kill boxes and how the solution given by this phenomenon subverts the traditional notions of sovereignty, challenging the very raison d’être of politics.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mendes,Cristiano, Junqueira,Karina
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292020000200237
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-85292020000200237
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-852920200002002372020-10-19Drones, Warfare and the Deconstruction of the EnemyMendes,CristianoJunqueira,Karina drones warfare terrorism enemy sovereignty. Abstract Based on the theoretical frameworks of Carl Schmitt (hostis and inimicus), Giorgio Agamben (field and homo sacer), and Grégoire Chamayou (hunter-states and kill boxes), and being seen through the theoretical lens of post-structuralism in International Relations, this article aims to analyse the use of drones, especially Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs), in the ‘War on Terror’ led by the USA. In this context, we seek to demonstrate how the use of drones has affected the logic of current warfare scenarios in three different, but related aspects. First of all (Act One), the use of drones makes the construction of political otherness of the enemy impossible, and thus identity construction by counterpoint impracticable. Then (Act Two), this paper demonstrates how there is an attempt to move the enemy to the externality of the International Community, relegating their status to banishment and marginalisation. Finally (Act Three), the authors analyse the role of kill boxes and how the solution given by this phenomenon subverts the traditional notions of sovereignty, challenging the very raison d’être of politics.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações InternacionaisContexto Internacional v.42 n.2 20202020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292020000200237en10.1590/s0102-8529.2019420200002
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Mendes,Cristiano
Junqueira,Karina
spellingShingle Mendes,Cristiano
Junqueira,Karina
Drones, Warfare and the Deconstruction of the Enemy
author_facet Mendes,Cristiano
Junqueira,Karina
author_sort Mendes,Cristiano
title Drones, Warfare and the Deconstruction of the Enemy
title_short Drones, Warfare and the Deconstruction of the Enemy
title_full Drones, Warfare and the Deconstruction of the Enemy
title_fullStr Drones, Warfare and the Deconstruction of the Enemy
title_full_unstemmed Drones, Warfare and the Deconstruction of the Enemy
title_sort drones, warfare and the deconstruction of the enemy
description Abstract Based on the theoretical frameworks of Carl Schmitt (hostis and inimicus), Giorgio Agamben (field and homo sacer), and Grégoire Chamayou (hunter-states and kill boxes), and being seen through the theoretical lens of post-structuralism in International Relations, this article aims to analyse the use of drones, especially Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs), in the ‘War on Terror’ led by the USA. In this context, we seek to demonstrate how the use of drones has affected the logic of current warfare scenarios in three different, but related aspects. First of all (Act One), the use of drones makes the construction of political otherness of the enemy impossible, and thus identity construction by counterpoint impracticable. Then (Act Two), this paper demonstrates how there is an attempt to move the enemy to the externality of the International Community, relegating their status to banishment and marginalisation. Finally (Act Three), the authors analyse the role of kill boxes and how the solution given by this phenomenon subverts the traditional notions of sovereignty, challenging the very raison d’être of politics.
publisher Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292020000200237
work_keys_str_mv AT mendescristiano droneswarfareandthedeconstructionoftheenemy
AT junqueirakarina droneswarfareandthedeconstructionoftheenemy
_version_ 1756400677695782912