Performance of the ATRIA Bleeding Score in Predicting the Risk of In-Hospital Bleeding in Patients with ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
ABSTRACT Introduction: A clear assessment of the bleeding risk score in patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) is crucial because of its impact on prognosis. The Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA score is a validated risk score to predict bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation (AF), but its predictive value in predicting bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients receiving antithrombotic therapy is unknown. Our aim was to investigate the predictive performance of the ATRIA bleeding score in STEMI and NSTEMI patients in comparison to the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) and ACUITY-HORIZONS (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY-Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) bleeding scores. Methods: A total of 830 consecutive STEMI and NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI were evaluated retrospectively. The ATRIA, CRUSADE, and ACUITY-HORIZONS risk scores of the patients were calculated. Discrimination of the three risk models was evaluated using C-statistics. Results: Major bleeding occurred in 52 (6.3%) of 830 patients during hospitalization. Bleeding scores were significantly higher in the bleeding patients than in non-bleeding patients (all P<0.001). The discriminatory ability of the ATRIA, CRUSADE, and ACUITY-HORIZONS bleeding scores for bleeding events was similar (C-statistics 0.810, 0.832, and 0.909, respectively). The good predictive value of all three scores for predicting the risk of bleeding was observed in NSTEMI and STEMI patients as well (C-statistics: 0.820, 0.793, and 0.921 and 0.809, 0.854, and 0.905, respectively). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the ATRIA bleeding score is a useful risk score for predicting major in-hospital bleeding in MI patients. This good predictive value was also present in STEMI and NSTEMI patient subgroups.
Main Authors: | Yavuz,Fethi, Kaplan,Mehmet, Yildirim,Abdullah, Genc,Omer, Asoglu,Ramazan, Afsin,Abdulmecit, Hosoglu,Yusuf, Kilic,Salih |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
2022
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022005005206 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Importance of the Prehospital Phase in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
by: Oliveira,Gláucia Maria Moraes de, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Biomarkers and Mortality in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
by: Spineti,Pedro Pimenta de Mello
Published: (2019) -
Combined effects of nutritional status on long-term mortality in patients with non-st segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Yıldırım,Arafat, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Usefulness of Immature Granulocytes as A Prognostic Factor in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
by: Korkut,Mustafa, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Predictive value of ATRIA risk score for contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
by: Aksoy,Fatih, et al.
Published: (2019)