Abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral CT and angiography

PURPOSE: To compare the computed tomography and angiography study of abdominal aortic aneurysms for posterior endograft implant. METHOD: From June 1997 to March 2001, 113 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm were submitted to study of the aorto-iliac axis with abdominal spiral computed tomography and angiography with calibrated catheter. The patient's ages ranged from 51 and 88 years (mean: 69). There were 104 males and nine females. RESULTS: When comparing the mean computed tomography and angiography diameters, we observed that there was a statistical difference for the infra-renal neck (p<0.05) and for the aortic aneurysm diameters (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference for the iliac artery diameters (p>0.05). When comparing the mean lengths, we observed that there was a statistical difference for the aortic infra-renal neck (p<0.05), for the distance between the renal artery and the aortic bifurcation (p<0.05) and for the common iliac artery lengths (p<0.05). There was also a statistical difference for the length between the renal artery and the internal iliac artery (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the AAA pre-procedure imaging study there were statistical differences between the computed tomography and angiographic measurement studies. We believe that computed tomography is a superior method for the evaluation of diameters and the angiography with a calibrated catheter for the length evaluation. We conclude, that both methods are complementary and must be undertaken for accurate evaluation of all candidates for aortic endograft implant.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Espinosa,Gaudencio, Marchiori,Edson, Araújo,Adalberto Pereira de, Caramalho,Mônica Ferreira, Barzola,Pedro
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2002
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382002000400007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-76382002000400007
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-763820020004000072003-05-19Abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral CT and angiographyEspinosa,GaudencioMarchiori,EdsonAraújo,Adalberto Pereira deCaramalho,Mônica FerreiraBarzola,Pedro Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Blood vessel prosthesis X-ray Computed Tomography Angiography PURPOSE: To compare the computed tomography and angiography study of abdominal aortic aneurysms for posterior endograft implant. METHOD: From June 1997 to March 2001, 113 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm were submitted to study of the aorto-iliac axis with abdominal spiral computed tomography and angiography with calibrated catheter. The patient's ages ranged from 51 and 88 years (mean: 69). There were 104 males and nine females. RESULTS: When comparing the mean computed tomography and angiography diameters, we observed that there was a statistical difference for the infra-renal neck (p<0.05) and for the aortic aneurysm diameters (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference for the iliac artery diameters (p>0.05). When comparing the mean lengths, we observed that there was a statistical difference for the aortic infra-renal neck (p<0.05), for the distance between the renal artery and the aortic bifurcation (p<0.05) and for the common iliac artery lengths (p<0.05). There was also a statistical difference for the length between the renal artery and the internal iliac artery (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the AAA pre-procedure imaging study there were statistical differences between the computed tomography and angiographic measurement studies. We believe that computed tomography is a superior method for the evaluation of diameters and the angiography with a calibrated catheter for the length evaluation. We conclude, that both methods are complementary and must be undertaken for accurate evaluation of all candidates for aortic endograft implant.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia CardiovascularBrazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.17 n.4 20022002-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382002000400007en10.1590/S0102-76382002000400007
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Espinosa,Gaudencio
Marchiori,Edson
Araújo,Adalberto Pereira de
Caramalho,Mônica Ferreira
Barzola,Pedro
spellingShingle Espinosa,Gaudencio
Marchiori,Edson
Araújo,Adalberto Pereira de
Caramalho,Mônica Ferreira
Barzola,Pedro
Abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral CT and angiography
author_facet Espinosa,Gaudencio
Marchiori,Edson
Araújo,Adalberto Pereira de
Caramalho,Mônica Ferreira
Barzola,Pedro
author_sort Espinosa,Gaudencio
title Abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral CT and angiography
title_short Abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral CT and angiography
title_full Abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral CT and angiography
title_fullStr Abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral CT and angiography
title_full_unstemmed Abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral CT and angiography
title_sort abdominal aorta morphometric study for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: comparison between spiral ct and angiography
description PURPOSE: To compare the computed tomography and angiography study of abdominal aortic aneurysms for posterior endograft implant. METHOD: From June 1997 to March 2001, 113 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm were submitted to study of the aorto-iliac axis with abdominal spiral computed tomography and angiography with calibrated catheter. The patient's ages ranged from 51 and 88 years (mean: 69). There were 104 males and nine females. RESULTS: When comparing the mean computed tomography and angiography diameters, we observed that there was a statistical difference for the infra-renal neck (p<0.05) and for the aortic aneurysm diameters (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference for the iliac artery diameters (p>0.05). When comparing the mean lengths, we observed that there was a statistical difference for the aortic infra-renal neck (p<0.05), for the distance between the renal artery and the aortic bifurcation (p<0.05) and for the common iliac artery lengths (p<0.05). There was also a statistical difference for the length between the renal artery and the internal iliac artery (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the AAA pre-procedure imaging study there were statistical differences between the computed tomography and angiographic measurement studies. We believe that computed tomography is a superior method for the evaluation of diameters and the angiography with a calibrated catheter for the length evaluation. We conclude, that both methods are complementary and must be undertaken for accurate evaluation of all candidates for aortic endograft implant.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publishDate 2002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382002000400007
work_keys_str_mv AT espinosagaudencio abdominalaortamorphometricstudyforendovasculartreatmentofaorticaneurysmscomparisonbetweenspiralctandangiography
AT marchioriedson abdominalaortamorphometricstudyforendovasculartreatmentofaorticaneurysmscomparisonbetweenspiralctandangiography
AT araujoadalbertopereirade abdominalaortamorphometricstudyforendovasculartreatmentofaorticaneurysmscomparisonbetweenspiralctandangiography
AT caramalhomonicaferreira abdominalaortamorphometricstudyforendovasculartreatmentofaorticaneurysmscomparisonbetweenspiralctandangiography
AT barzolapedro abdominalaortamorphometricstudyforendovasculartreatmentofaorticaneurysmscomparisonbetweenspiralctandangiography
_version_ 1756429346455683072