Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic access, with its classically known benefits, pushed implementation in other components, better ergonomy and aesthetic aspect. AIM: To minimize the number and diameter of traditional portals using miniport and flexible liver retractor on bariatric surgery. METHOD: This prospective study was used in patients with less than 45 kg/m2, with peripheral fat, normal umbilicus implantation, without previous abdominoplasties. Were used one 30o optical device with 5 mm in diameter, four accesses (one mini of 3 mm to the left hand of the surgeon, one of 5 mm to the right hand alternating with optics, one of 12 mm for umbilical for surgical maneuvers as dissection, clipping, in/out of gauze, and one portal of 5 mm for the assistant surgeon), resulting in a total of 25 mm linear incision; additionally, one flexible liver retractor (covered with a nelaton probe to protect the liver parenchyma, anchored in the right diaphragmatic pillar and going out through the surgeon left portal) to visualize the esophagogastric angle. RESULTS: In selected patients (48 operations), gastric bypass was performed at a similar time to the procedures with larger diameters (5 or 6 portals and 10 mm optics, with sum of linear incision of 42 mm) including oversuture line on excluded stomach, gastric tube and mesenteric closing. The non sutured portal of 3 mm and the two of 5 mm with subdermal sutures, were hardly visible in the folds of the skin; the one of 12 mm was buried inside the umbilicus or in the abdominoplasty incision. CONCLUSION: Minimizing portals is safe, effective, good ergonomic alternative with satisfactory aesthetic profile without need for specific instruments, new learning curve and limited movement of the instruments, as required by the single port.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: MOURA-JÚNIOR,Luiz Gonzaga de, CASTRO-FILHO,Heládio Feitosa de, MACHADO,Francisco Heine Ferreira, BABADOPULOS,Rodrigo Feitosa, FEIJÓ,Francisca das Chagas, FERNANDES,Silvana Duarte
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2014
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202014000600077
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-67202014000600077
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-672020140006000772017-07-31Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypassMOURA-JÚNIOR,Luiz Gonzaga deCASTRO-FILHO,Heládio Feitosa deMACHADO,Francisco Heine FerreiraBABADOPULOS,Rodrigo FeitosaFEIJÓ,Francisca das ChagasFERNANDES,Silvana Duarte Gastric bypass Human engineering BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic access, with its classically known benefits, pushed implementation in other components, better ergonomy and aesthetic aspect. AIM: To minimize the number and diameter of traditional portals using miniport and flexible liver retractor on bariatric surgery. METHOD: This prospective study was used in patients with less than 45 kg/m2, with peripheral fat, normal umbilicus implantation, without previous abdominoplasties. Were used one 30o optical device with 5 mm in diameter, four accesses (one mini of 3 mm to the left hand of the surgeon, one of 5 mm to the right hand alternating with optics, one of 12 mm for umbilical for surgical maneuvers as dissection, clipping, in/out of gauze, and one portal of 5 mm for the assistant surgeon), resulting in a total of 25 mm linear incision; additionally, one flexible liver retractor (covered with a nelaton probe to protect the liver parenchyma, anchored in the right diaphragmatic pillar and going out through the surgeon left portal) to visualize the esophagogastric angle. RESULTS: In selected patients (48 operations), gastric bypass was performed at a similar time to the procedures with larger diameters (5 or 6 portals and 10 mm optics, with sum of linear incision of 42 mm) including oversuture line on excluded stomach, gastric tube and mesenteric closing. The non sutured portal of 3 mm and the two of 5 mm with subdermal sutures, were hardly visible in the folds of the skin; the one of 12 mm was buried inside the umbilicus or in the abdominoplasty incision. CONCLUSION: Minimizing portals is safe, effective, good ergonomic alternative with satisfactory aesthetic profile without need for specific instruments, new learning curve and limited movement of the instruments, as required by the single port.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia DigestivaABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.27 suppl.1 20142014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202014000600077en10.1590/s0102-6720201400s100019
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author MOURA-JÚNIOR,Luiz Gonzaga de
CASTRO-FILHO,Heládio Feitosa de
MACHADO,Francisco Heine Ferreira
BABADOPULOS,Rodrigo Feitosa
FEIJÓ,Francisca das Chagas
FERNANDES,Silvana Duarte
spellingShingle MOURA-JÚNIOR,Luiz Gonzaga de
CASTRO-FILHO,Heládio Feitosa de
MACHADO,Francisco Heine Ferreira
BABADOPULOS,Rodrigo Feitosa
FEIJÓ,Francisca das Chagas
FERNANDES,Silvana Duarte
Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass
author_facet MOURA-JÚNIOR,Luiz Gonzaga de
CASTRO-FILHO,Heládio Feitosa de
MACHADO,Francisco Heine Ferreira
BABADOPULOS,Rodrigo Feitosa
FEIJÓ,Francisca das Chagas
FERNANDES,Silvana Duarte
author_sort MOURA-JÚNIOR,Luiz Gonzaga de
title Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass
title_short Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass
title_full Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass
title_fullStr Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass
title_full_unstemmed Ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass
title_sort ports minimization with mini-port and liver flexible retractor: an ergonomic and aesthetic alternative for single port in laparoscopic gastric bypass
description BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic access, with its classically known benefits, pushed implementation in other components, better ergonomy and aesthetic aspect. AIM: To minimize the number and diameter of traditional portals using miniport and flexible liver retractor on bariatric surgery. METHOD: This prospective study was used in patients with less than 45 kg/m2, with peripheral fat, normal umbilicus implantation, without previous abdominoplasties. Were used one 30o optical device with 5 mm in diameter, four accesses (one mini of 3 mm to the left hand of the surgeon, one of 5 mm to the right hand alternating with optics, one of 12 mm for umbilical for surgical maneuvers as dissection, clipping, in/out of gauze, and one portal of 5 mm for the assistant surgeon), resulting in a total of 25 mm linear incision; additionally, one flexible liver retractor (covered with a nelaton probe to protect the liver parenchyma, anchored in the right diaphragmatic pillar and going out through the surgeon left portal) to visualize the esophagogastric angle. RESULTS: In selected patients (48 operations), gastric bypass was performed at a similar time to the procedures with larger diameters (5 or 6 portals and 10 mm optics, with sum of linear incision of 42 mm) including oversuture line on excluded stomach, gastric tube and mesenteric closing. The non sutured portal of 3 mm and the two of 5 mm with subdermal sutures, were hardly visible in the folds of the skin; the one of 12 mm was buried inside the umbilicus or in the abdominoplasty incision. CONCLUSION: Minimizing portals is safe, effective, good ergonomic alternative with satisfactory aesthetic profile without need for specific instruments, new learning curve and limited movement of the instruments, as required by the single port.
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
publishDate 2014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202014000600077
work_keys_str_mv AT mourajuniorluizgonzagade portsminimizationwithminiportandliverflexibleretractoranergonomicandaestheticalternativeforsingleportinlaparoscopicgastricbypass
AT castrofilhoheladiofeitosade portsminimizationwithminiportandliverflexibleretractoranergonomicandaestheticalternativeforsingleportinlaparoscopicgastricbypass
AT machadofranciscoheineferreira portsminimizationwithminiportandliverflexibleretractoranergonomicandaestheticalternativeforsingleportinlaparoscopicgastricbypass
AT babadopulosrodrigofeitosa portsminimizationwithminiportandliverflexibleretractoranergonomicandaestheticalternativeforsingleportinlaparoscopicgastricbypass
AT feijofranciscadaschagas portsminimizationwithminiportandliverflexibleretractoranergonomicandaestheticalternativeforsingleportinlaparoscopicgastricbypass
AT fernandessilvanaduarte portsminimizationwithminiportandliverflexibleretractoranergonomicandaestheticalternativeforsingleportinlaparoscopicgastricbypass
_version_ 1756398917295013888