Intramedullary Fixation with Headless Screws versus Bouquet in Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures in Active Patients: A Randomized Study

Abstract Objeticve To compare the range of motion (ROM), return-to-work time, visual analogue score (VAS), disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH), and radiographic outcomes of two methods of definitive internal fixation in active patients with boxer’s fractures, operated in the first week. Methods This was a prospective, randomized trial, in which 50 patients, with a mean age range of 18 to 40 years old, were randomized and treated to definitive intramedullary fixation using 2 headless screws (n = 20) or bouquet (2 or 3 Kirschner wires) (n = 20). The patients were assessed on return-to-work time, ROM, patient reported QuickDASH outcome, VAS, and radiographic evaluation at 6 months. Results At 6 months, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of ROM, postoperative pain (VAS), or QuickDASH score. The overall complication rate was 4.76% in the screw group, compared with 5% in the bouquet-fixation group. Conclusions In the treatment of the active patients with unstable boxer’s fractures, headless screws and bouquet fixation proved to be a safe and reliable treatment. The outcomes were similar in both groups.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aita,Marcio Aurelio, Oliveira,Ricardo Kaempf de, Biondi,Bruno Gianordoli, Brunelli,João Pedro Farina, Ruggiero,Gustavo Mantovanni, Delgado,Pedro Jose
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2021
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000600717
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-36162021000600717
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-361620210006007172022-01-07Intramedullary Fixation with Headless Screws versus Bouquet in Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures in Active Patients: A Randomized StudyAita,Marcio AurelioOliveira,Ricardo Kaempf deBiondi,Bruno GianordoliBrunelli,João Pedro FarinaRuggiero,Gustavo MantovanniDelgado,Pedro Jose metacarpal bones boxer’s fracture fracture fixation intramedullary minimally invasive surgical procedures clinical trials randomized Abstract Objeticve To compare the range of motion (ROM), return-to-work time, visual analogue score (VAS), disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH), and radiographic outcomes of two methods of definitive internal fixation in active patients with boxer’s fractures, operated in the first week. Methods This was a prospective, randomized trial, in which 50 patients, with a mean age range of 18 to 40 years old, were randomized and treated to definitive intramedullary fixation using 2 headless screws (n = 20) or bouquet (2 or 3 Kirschner wires) (n = 20). The patients were assessed on return-to-work time, ROM, patient reported QuickDASH outcome, VAS, and radiographic evaluation at 6 months. Results At 6 months, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of ROM, postoperative pain (VAS), or QuickDASH score. The overall complication rate was 4.76% in the screw group, compared with 5% in the bouquet-fixation group. Conclusions In the treatment of the active patients with unstable boxer’s fractures, headless screws and bouquet fixation proved to be a safe and reliable treatment. The outcomes were similar in both groups.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.56 n.6 20212021-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000600717en10.1055/s-0041-1729568
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Aita,Marcio Aurelio
Oliveira,Ricardo Kaempf de
Biondi,Bruno Gianordoli
Brunelli,João Pedro Farina
Ruggiero,Gustavo Mantovanni
Delgado,Pedro Jose
spellingShingle Aita,Marcio Aurelio
Oliveira,Ricardo Kaempf de
Biondi,Bruno Gianordoli
Brunelli,João Pedro Farina
Ruggiero,Gustavo Mantovanni
Delgado,Pedro Jose
Intramedullary Fixation with Headless Screws versus Bouquet in Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures in Active Patients: A Randomized Study
author_facet Aita,Marcio Aurelio
Oliveira,Ricardo Kaempf de
Biondi,Bruno Gianordoli
Brunelli,João Pedro Farina
Ruggiero,Gustavo Mantovanni
Delgado,Pedro Jose
author_sort Aita,Marcio Aurelio
title Intramedullary Fixation with Headless Screws versus Bouquet in Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures in Active Patients: A Randomized Study
title_short Intramedullary Fixation with Headless Screws versus Bouquet in Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures in Active Patients: A Randomized Study
title_full Intramedullary Fixation with Headless Screws versus Bouquet in Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures in Active Patients: A Randomized Study
title_fullStr Intramedullary Fixation with Headless Screws versus Bouquet in Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures in Active Patients: A Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Intramedullary Fixation with Headless Screws versus Bouquet in Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures in Active Patients: A Randomized Study
title_sort intramedullary fixation with headless screws versus bouquet in unstable metacarpal neck fractures in active patients: a randomized study
description Abstract Objeticve To compare the range of motion (ROM), return-to-work time, visual analogue score (VAS), disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH), and radiographic outcomes of two methods of definitive internal fixation in active patients with boxer’s fractures, operated in the first week. Methods This was a prospective, randomized trial, in which 50 patients, with a mean age range of 18 to 40 years old, were randomized and treated to definitive intramedullary fixation using 2 headless screws (n = 20) or bouquet (2 or 3 Kirschner wires) (n = 20). The patients were assessed on return-to-work time, ROM, patient reported QuickDASH outcome, VAS, and radiographic evaluation at 6 months. Results At 6 months, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of ROM, postoperative pain (VAS), or QuickDASH score. The overall complication rate was 4.76% in the screw group, compared with 5% in the bouquet-fixation group. Conclusions In the treatment of the active patients with unstable boxer’s fractures, headless screws and bouquet fixation proved to be a safe and reliable treatment. The outcomes were similar in both groups.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publishDate 2021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000600717
work_keys_str_mv AT aitamarcioaurelio intramedullaryfixationwithheadlessscrewsversusbouquetinunstablemetacarpalneckfracturesinactivepatientsarandomizedstudy
AT oliveiraricardokaempfde intramedullaryfixationwithheadlessscrewsversusbouquetinunstablemetacarpalneckfracturesinactivepatientsarandomizedstudy
AT biondibrunogianordoli intramedullaryfixationwithheadlessscrewsversusbouquetinunstablemetacarpalneckfracturesinactivepatientsarandomizedstudy
AT brunellijoaopedrofarina intramedullaryfixationwithheadlessscrewsversusbouquetinunstablemetacarpalneckfracturesinactivepatientsarandomizedstudy
AT ruggierogustavomantovanni intramedullaryfixationwithheadlessscrewsversusbouquetinunstablemetacarpalneckfracturesinactivepatientsarandomizedstudy
AT delgadopedrojose intramedullaryfixationwithheadlessscrewsversusbouquetinunstablemetacarpalneckfracturesinactivepatientsarandomizedstudy
_version_ 1756397850128809984