Biomechanical Evidence on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract Objective Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is recommended in athletes with high physical demands. Several techniques are used in reconstruction; however, themost relevant question still is the best biomechanical positioning for the graft. The present study aimed to analyze the biomechanical effect of the position of bone tunnels on load distribution and joint kinetics, as well as the medium-term functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. Methods A biomechanical study using a finite element model of the original knee (without anterior cruciate ligament rupture) and reconstruction of the ACL (neoACL) was performed in four combinations of bone tunnel positions (central femoral-central tibial, anterior femoral-central tibial, posterosuperior femoral-anterior tibial, and central femoral-anterior tibial) using the same type of graft. Each neo-ACL model was compared with the original knee model regarding cartilaginous contact pressure, femoral and meniscal rotation and translation, and ligamentous deformation. Results No neo-ACL model was able to fully replicate the original knee model. When the femoral tunnel was posteriorly positioned, cartilage pressures were 25% lower, and the mobility of the meniscus was 12 to 30% higher compared with the original knee model. When the femoral tunnel was in the anterior position, internal rotation was 50% lower than in the original knee model. Conclusion Results show that the femoral tunnel farther from the central position appears to be more suitable for a distinct behavior regarding the intact joint. The most anterior position increases rotational instability.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Completo,António, Noronha,José Carlos, Oliveira,Carlos, Fonseca,Fernando
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000200190
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-36162019000200190
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-361620190002001902019-05-29Biomechanical Evidence on Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionCompleto,AntónioNoronha,José CarlosOliveira,CarlosFonseca,Fernando rupture anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction anterior cruciate ligament Abstract Objective Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is recommended in athletes with high physical demands. Several techniques are used in reconstruction; however, themost relevant question still is the best biomechanical positioning for the graft. The present study aimed to analyze the biomechanical effect of the position of bone tunnels on load distribution and joint kinetics, as well as the medium-term functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. Methods A biomechanical study using a finite element model of the original knee (without anterior cruciate ligament rupture) and reconstruction of the ACL (neoACL) was performed in four combinations of bone tunnel positions (central femoral-central tibial, anterior femoral-central tibial, posterosuperior femoral-anterior tibial, and central femoral-anterior tibial) using the same type of graft. Each neo-ACL model was compared with the original knee model regarding cartilaginous contact pressure, femoral and meniscal rotation and translation, and ligamentous deformation. Results No neo-ACL model was able to fully replicate the original knee model. When the femoral tunnel was posteriorly positioned, cartilage pressures were 25% lower, and the mobility of the meniscus was 12 to 30% higher compared with the original knee model. When the femoral tunnel was in the anterior position, internal rotation was 50% lower than in the original knee model. Conclusion Results show that the femoral tunnel farther from the central position appears to be more suitable for a distinct behavior regarding the intact joint. The most anterior position increases rotational instability.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.54 n.2 20192019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000200190en10.1016/j.rbo.2017.11.008
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Completo,António
Noronha,José Carlos
Oliveira,Carlos
Fonseca,Fernando
spellingShingle Completo,António
Noronha,José Carlos
Oliveira,Carlos
Fonseca,Fernando
Biomechanical Evidence on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
author_facet Completo,António
Noronha,José Carlos
Oliveira,Carlos
Fonseca,Fernando
author_sort Completo,António
title Biomechanical Evidence on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_short Biomechanical Evidence on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full Biomechanical Evidence on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_fullStr Biomechanical Evidence on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Evidence on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_sort biomechanical evidence on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
description Abstract Objective Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is recommended in athletes with high physical demands. Several techniques are used in reconstruction; however, themost relevant question still is the best biomechanical positioning for the graft. The present study aimed to analyze the biomechanical effect of the position of bone tunnels on load distribution and joint kinetics, as well as the medium-term functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. Methods A biomechanical study using a finite element model of the original knee (without anterior cruciate ligament rupture) and reconstruction of the ACL (neoACL) was performed in four combinations of bone tunnel positions (central femoral-central tibial, anterior femoral-central tibial, posterosuperior femoral-anterior tibial, and central femoral-anterior tibial) using the same type of graft. Each neo-ACL model was compared with the original knee model regarding cartilaginous contact pressure, femoral and meniscal rotation and translation, and ligamentous deformation. Results No neo-ACL model was able to fully replicate the original knee model. When the femoral tunnel was posteriorly positioned, cartilage pressures were 25% lower, and the mobility of the meniscus was 12 to 30% higher compared with the original knee model. When the femoral tunnel was in the anterior position, internal rotation was 50% lower than in the original knee model. Conclusion Results show that the femoral tunnel farther from the central position appears to be more suitable for a distinct behavior regarding the intact joint. The most anterior position increases rotational instability.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000200190
work_keys_str_mv AT completoantonio biomechanicalevidenceonanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT noronhajosecarlos biomechanicalevidenceonanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT oliveiracarlos biomechanicalevidenceonanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT fonsecafernando biomechanicalevidenceonanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
_version_ 1756397803047747584