Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Methods: A total of 110 hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstructions were performed and divided into two groups: 1-hamstring tendon retraction technique; and 2 - technique maintaining the tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon. During the preparation, two graft fragments were sent for culturing; the harvesting time, the preparation time, and the total surgery time were measured. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the C-reactive protein was assayed. The clinical outpatient follow-up was performed up to 180 days postoperatively. Results: Although there were two postoperative infections, there was no graft contamination or difference between the groups in relation to the graft preparation time and to the 24-hour postoperative C-reactive protein assessment. The classic technique presented a longer graft harvesting time (p = 0.038), and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the degree of contamination and consequent clinical infection, although 2 patients in group 2 presented with infection, with negative perioperative cultures. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, there was no association between graft contamination and the time or technique of its preparation. In addition, there was also no association between intraoperative contamination and the development of clinical infection, nor was there any sign of an association between the early alteration of Creactive protein and the onset of infection.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Temponi,Eduardo Frois, Costa,Luís Henrique Grassi Marques da, Soares,Luiz Fernando Machado, Carvalho Júnior,Lúcio Honório de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000100045
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-36162019000100045
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-361620190001000452019-05-15Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting TechniquesTemponi,Eduardo FroisCosta,Luís Henrique Grassi Marques daSoares,Luiz Fernando MachadoCarvalho Júnior,Lúcio Honório de flexor graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infection septic arthritis Abstract Objective: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Methods: A total of 110 hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstructions were performed and divided into two groups: 1-hamstring tendon retraction technique; and 2 - technique maintaining the tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon. During the preparation, two graft fragments were sent for culturing; the harvesting time, the preparation time, and the total surgery time were measured. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the C-reactive protein was assayed. The clinical outpatient follow-up was performed up to 180 days postoperatively. Results: Although there were two postoperative infections, there was no graft contamination or difference between the groups in relation to the graft preparation time and to the 24-hour postoperative C-reactive protein assessment. The classic technique presented a longer graft harvesting time (p = 0.038), and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the degree of contamination and consequent clinical infection, although 2 patients in group 2 presented with infection, with negative perioperative cultures. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, there was no association between graft contamination and the time or technique of its preparation. In addition, there was also no association between intraoperative contamination and the development of clinical infection, nor was there any sign of an association between the early alteration of Creactive protein and the onset of infection.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.54 n.1 20192019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000100045en10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.008
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Temponi,Eduardo Frois
Costa,Luís Henrique Grassi Marques da
Soares,Luiz Fernando Machado
Carvalho Júnior,Lúcio Honório de
spellingShingle Temponi,Eduardo Frois
Costa,Luís Henrique Grassi Marques da
Soares,Luiz Fernando Machado
Carvalho Júnior,Lúcio Honório de
Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
author_facet Temponi,Eduardo Frois
Costa,Luís Henrique Grassi Marques da
Soares,Luiz Fernando Machado
Carvalho Júnior,Lúcio Honório de
author_sort Temponi,Eduardo Frois
title Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_short Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_full Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_fullStr Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_sort hamstring tendon autograft contamination in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between two harvesting techniques
description Abstract Objective: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Methods: A total of 110 hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstructions were performed and divided into two groups: 1-hamstring tendon retraction technique; and 2 - technique maintaining the tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon. During the preparation, two graft fragments were sent for culturing; the harvesting time, the preparation time, and the total surgery time were measured. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the C-reactive protein was assayed. The clinical outpatient follow-up was performed up to 180 days postoperatively. Results: Although there were two postoperative infections, there was no graft contamination or difference between the groups in relation to the graft preparation time and to the 24-hour postoperative C-reactive protein assessment. The classic technique presented a longer graft harvesting time (p = 0.038), and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the degree of contamination and consequent clinical infection, although 2 patients in group 2 presented with infection, with negative perioperative cultures. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, there was no association between graft contamination and the time or technique of its preparation. In addition, there was also no association between intraoperative contamination and the development of clinical infection, nor was there any sign of an association between the early alteration of Creactive protein and the onset of infection.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000100045
work_keys_str_mv AT temponieduardofrois hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques
AT costaluishenriquegrassimarquesda hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques
AT soaresluizfernandomachado hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques
AT carvalhojuniorluciohonoriode hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques
_version_ 1756397799717470208