Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptoms

Point-of-care serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 have been used for COVID-19 diagnosis. However, their accuracy over time regarding the onset of symptoms is not fully understood. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay (LFI). Subjects, aged over 18 years, presenting clinical symptoms suggestive of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were tested once by both nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal RT-PCR and LFI. The accuracy of LFI was assessed in periodic intervals of three days in relation to the onset of symptoms. The optimal cut-off point was defined as the number of days required to achieve the best sensitivity and specificity. This cut-off point was also used to compare LFI accuracy according to participants’ status: outpatient or hospitalized. In total, 959 patients were included, 379 (39.52%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR, and 272 (28.36%) tested positive with LFI. LFI best performance was achieved after 10 days of the onset of symptoms, with sensitivity and specificity of 84.9% (95%CI: 79.8-89.1) and 94.4% (95%CI: 91.0-96.8), respectively. Although the specificity was similar (94.6% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.051), the sensitivity was higher in hospitalized patients than in outpatients (91.7% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.032) after 10 days of the onset of symptoms. Best sensitivity of point-of-care LFI was found 10 days after the onset of symptoms which may limit its use in acute care. Specificity remained high regardless of the number of days since the onset of symptoms.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David,Caroline Nespolo de, Varela,Fernanda Hammes, Sartor,Ivaine Tais Sauthier, Polese-Bonatto,Márcia, Fernandes,Ingrid Rodrigues, Zavaglia,Gabriela Oliveira, Kern,Luciane Beatriz, Ferreira,Charles Francisco, Bastos,Gisele Alsina Nader, Pitrez,Paulo Márcio, Almeida,Walquiria Aparecida Ferreira de, Porto,Victor Bertollo Gomes, Zavascki,Alexandre Prehn, Stein,Renato Tetelbom, Scotta,Marcelo Comerlato
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000105007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-311X2022000105007
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-311X20220001050072022-01-10Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptomsDavid,Caroline Nespolo deVarela,Fernanda HammesSartor,Ivaine Tais SauthierPolese-Bonatto,MárciaFernandes,Ingrid RodriguesZavaglia,Gabriela OliveiraKern,Luciane BeatrizFerreira,Charles FranciscoBastos,Gisele Alsina NaderPitrez,Paulo MárcioAlmeida,Walquiria Aparecida Ferreira dePorto,Victor Bertollo GomesZavascki,Alexandre PrehnStein,Renato TetelbomScotta,Marcelo Comerlato SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Testing Point-of-Care Testing Immunoassay Sensitivity and Specificity Point-of-care serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 have been used for COVID-19 diagnosis. However, their accuracy over time regarding the onset of symptoms is not fully understood. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay (LFI). Subjects, aged over 18 years, presenting clinical symptoms suggestive of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were tested once by both nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal RT-PCR and LFI. The accuracy of LFI was assessed in periodic intervals of three days in relation to the onset of symptoms. The optimal cut-off point was defined as the number of days required to achieve the best sensitivity and specificity. This cut-off point was also used to compare LFI accuracy according to participants’ status: outpatient or hospitalized. In total, 959 patients were included, 379 (39.52%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR, and 272 (28.36%) tested positive with LFI. LFI best performance was achieved after 10 days of the onset of symptoms, with sensitivity and specificity of 84.9% (95%CI: 79.8-89.1) and 94.4% (95%CI: 91.0-96.8), respectively. Although the specificity was similar (94.6% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.051), the sensitivity was higher in hospitalized patients than in outpatients (91.7% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.032) after 10 days of the onset of symptoms. Best sensitivity of point-of-care LFI was found 10 days after the onset of symptoms which may limit its use in acute care. Specificity remained high regardless of the number of days since the onset of symptoms.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo CruzCadernos de Saúde Pública v.38 n.1 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000105007en10.1590/0102-311x00069921
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author David,Caroline Nespolo de
Varela,Fernanda Hammes
Sartor,Ivaine Tais Sauthier
Polese-Bonatto,Márcia
Fernandes,Ingrid Rodrigues
Zavaglia,Gabriela Oliveira
Kern,Luciane Beatriz
Ferreira,Charles Francisco
Bastos,Gisele Alsina Nader
Pitrez,Paulo Márcio
Almeida,Walquiria Aparecida Ferreira de
Porto,Victor Bertollo Gomes
Zavascki,Alexandre Prehn
Stein,Renato Tetelbom
Scotta,Marcelo Comerlato
spellingShingle David,Caroline Nespolo de
Varela,Fernanda Hammes
Sartor,Ivaine Tais Sauthier
Polese-Bonatto,Márcia
Fernandes,Ingrid Rodrigues
Zavaglia,Gabriela Oliveira
Kern,Luciane Beatriz
Ferreira,Charles Francisco
Bastos,Gisele Alsina Nader
Pitrez,Paulo Márcio
Almeida,Walquiria Aparecida Ferreira de
Porto,Victor Bertollo Gomes
Zavascki,Alexandre Prehn
Stein,Renato Tetelbom
Scotta,Marcelo Comerlato
Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptoms
author_facet David,Caroline Nespolo de
Varela,Fernanda Hammes
Sartor,Ivaine Tais Sauthier
Polese-Bonatto,Márcia
Fernandes,Ingrid Rodrigues
Zavaglia,Gabriela Oliveira
Kern,Luciane Beatriz
Ferreira,Charles Francisco
Bastos,Gisele Alsina Nader
Pitrez,Paulo Márcio
Almeida,Walquiria Aparecida Ferreira de
Porto,Victor Bertollo Gomes
Zavascki,Alexandre Prehn
Stein,Renato Tetelbom
Scotta,Marcelo Comerlato
author_sort David,Caroline Nespolo de
title Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptoms
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptoms
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptoms
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptoms
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptoms
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of a sars-cov-2 rapid test and optimal time for seropositivity according to the onset of symptoms
description Point-of-care serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 have been used for COVID-19 diagnosis. However, their accuracy over time regarding the onset of symptoms is not fully understood. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay (LFI). Subjects, aged over 18 years, presenting clinical symptoms suggestive of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were tested once by both nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal RT-PCR and LFI. The accuracy of LFI was assessed in periodic intervals of three days in relation to the onset of symptoms. The optimal cut-off point was defined as the number of days required to achieve the best sensitivity and specificity. This cut-off point was also used to compare LFI accuracy according to participants’ status: outpatient or hospitalized. In total, 959 patients were included, 379 (39.52%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR, and 272 (28.36%) tested positive with LFI. LFI best performance was achieved after 10 days of the onset of symptoms, with sensitivity and specificity of 84.9% (95%CI: 79.8-89.1) and 94.4% (95%CI: 91.0-96.8), respectively. Although the specificity was similar (94.6% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.051), the sensitivity was higher in hospitalized patients than in outpatients (91.7% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.032) after 10 days of the onset of symptoms. Best sensitivity of point-of-care LFI was found 10 days after the onset of symptoms which may limit its use in acute care. Specificity remained high regardless of the number of days since the onset of symptoms.
publisher Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000105007
work_keys_str_mv AT davidcarolinenespolode diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT varelafernandahammes diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT sartorivainetaissauthier diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT polesebonattomarcia diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT fernandesingridrodrigues diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT zavagliagabrielaoliveira diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT kernlucianebeatriz diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT ferreiracharlesfrancisco diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT bastosgiselealsinanader diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT pitrezpaulomarcio diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT almeidawalquiriaaparecidaferreirade diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT portovictorbertollogomes diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT zavasckialexandreprehn diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT steinrenatotetelbom diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
AT scottamarcelocomerlato diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidtestandoptimaltimeforseropositivityaccordingtotheonsetofsymptoms
_version_ 1756397189999886336