Cosmic ray Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparison

The evolutions of the Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of Oct. 28, 2003 (the famous Halloween event) and the subsequent Jan. 20, 2005 (a verylarge event in the declining phase of cycle 23) were examined. It was noticed that the Oct. 28, 2003 GLE was a very small one, in contrast to the large CR Forbush decreases and geomagnetic Dst storms that occurred the next day, on Oct. 29, 2003. These may not have the same origins. Hence, three more events were also studied, namely the largest GLE 5 of Feb. 23, 1956 (meager data), the second largest GLE 42 of Sep. 29, 1989, and the fourth largest GLE 45 of Oct. 24, 1989 (comparable to GLE 69, the third largest GLE of Jan. 20, 2005). For each, the plots of few-minute and/or hourly values as also the latitude-longitude distributions of the GLE magnitudes (percentage increases) were examined. It was noticed that at similar mid-latitudes, locations at different longitudes showed different latitude distributions of the magnitudes, indicating that events had longitudinal anisotropies, more in some events, less in others. Thus, the present paper illustrates a simple way of detecting anisotropies qualitatively. Only the maximum enhancement magnitudes were used, irrespective of the phases (maxima occurring at different times at different locations). If simultaneous magnitudes are used as these occurred at specific UTs in succession, more details could be studied such as changes in the characteristics (spectra etc., or multiple populations) of the incoming particles, as is done in sophisticated analyses. The present approach may be considered as a first look at a complex phenomenon.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kane,Rajaram Purushottam
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica 2009
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-261X2009000200002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-261X2009000200002
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-261X20090002000022009-12-01Cosmic ray Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparisonKane,Rajaram Purushottam cosmic rays ground level enhancements GLEs The evolutions of the Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of Oct. 28, 2003 (the famous Halloween event) and the subsequent Jan. 20, 2005 (a verylarge event in the declining phase of cycle 23) were examined. It was noticed that the Oct. 28, 2003 GLE was a very small one, in contrast to the large CR Forbush decreases and geomagnetic Dst storms that occurred the next day, on Oct. 29, 2003. These may not have the same origins. Hence, three more events were also studied, namely the largest GLE 5 of Feb. 23, 1956 (meager data), the second largest GLE 42 of Sep. 29, 1989, and the fourth largest GLE 45 of Oct. 24, 1989 (comparable to GLE 69, the third largest GLE of Jan. 20, 2005). For each, the plots of few-minute and/or hourly values as also the latitude-longitude distributions of the GLE magnitudes (percentage increases) were examined. It was noticed that at similar mid-latitudes, locations at different longitudes showed different latitude distributions of the magnitudes, indicating that events had longitudinal anisotropies, more in some events, less in others. Thus, the present paper illustrates a simple way of detecting anisotropies qualitatively. Only the maximum enhancement magnitudes were used, irrespective of the phases (maxima occurring at different times at different locations). If simultaneous magnitudes are used as these occurred at specific UTs in succession, more details could be studied such as changes in the characteristics (spectra etc., or multiple populations) of the incoming particles, as is done in sophisticated analyses. The present approach may be considered as a first look at a complex phenomenon.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de GeofísicaRevista Brasileira de Geofísica v.27 n.2 20092009-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-261X2009000200002en10.1590/S0102-261X2009000200002
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Kane,Rajaram Purushottam
spellingShingle Kane,Rajaram Purushottam
Cosmic ray Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparison
author_facet Kane,Rajaram Purushottam
author_sort Kane,Rajaram Purushottam
title Cosmic ray Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparison
title_short Cosmic ray Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparison
title_full Cosmic ray Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparison
title_fullStr Cosmic ray Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparison
title_full_unstemmed Cosmic ray Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparison
title_sort cosmic ray ground level enhancements (gles) of october 28, 2003 and january 20, 2005: a simple comparison
description The evolutions of the Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) of Oct. 28, 2003 (the famous Halloween event) and the subsequent Jan. 20, 2005 (a verylarge event in the declining phase of cycle 23) were examined. It was noticed that the Oct. 28, 2003 GLE was a very small one, in contrast to the large CR Forbush decreases and geomagnetic Dst storms that occurred the next day, on Oct. 29, 2003. These may not have the same origins. Hence, three more events were also studied, namely the largest GLE 5 of Feb. 23, 1956 (meager data), the second largest GLE 42 of Sep. 29, 1989, and the fourth largest GLE 45 of Oct. 24, 1989 (comparable to GLE 69, the third largest GLE of Jan. 20, 2005). For each, the plots of few-minute and/or hourly values as also the latitude-longitude distributions of the GLE magnitudes (percentage increases) were examined. It was noticed that at similar mid-latitudes, locations at different longitudes showed different latitude distributions of the magnitudes, indicating that events had longitudinal anisotropies, more in some events, less in others. Thus, the present paper illustrates a simple way of detecting anisotropies qualitatively. Only the maximum enhancement magnitudes were used, irrespective of the phases (maxima occurring at different times at different locations). If simultaneous magnitudes are used as these occurred at specific UTs in succession, more details could be studied such as changes in the characteristics (spectra etc., or multiple populations) of the incoming particles, as is done in sophisticated analyses. The present approach may be considered as a first look at a complex phenomenon.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica
publishDate 2009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-261X2009000200002
work_keys_str_mv AT kanerajarampurushottam cosmicraygroundlevelenhancementsglesofoctober282003andjanuary202005asimplecomparison
_version_ 1756395989795602432