Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy on reproductive performance and animal welfare parameters. After artificial insemination protocol, 524 females were divided into two gestation housing systems: PEN1=animals housed in individual stalls during the breeding and after group-housed; PEN32=animals housed in individual stalls from breeding until 32 days of pregnancy and after group-housed. The number of piglets born, and the pregnancy and farrowing rates were evaluated. Welfare parameters related to the pregnancy phase were used. Females who weaned more piglets in the previous farrowing had a higher number of piglets born at the next farrowing. The pregnancy rate was affected by the number of semen doses. The farrowing rate was not influenced by the evaluated parameters, with average value of 91.36%. There was no effect of the gestation housing system and the genetic lines on pregnancy and farrowing rates, with values above 90.0%. The animal welfare indicators showed more compromised parameters in PEN1 system. PEN1 system did not impair the reproductive performance although it presented more compromised animal welfare parameters.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bampi,D., Borstnez,K.K., Dias,C.P., Costa,O.A.D., Moreira,F., Peripolli,V., Oliveira Júnior,J.M., Schwegler,E., Rauber,L.P., Bianchi,I.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352020000501675
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-09352020000501675
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-093520200005016752020-11-05Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancyBampi,D.Borstnez,K.K.Dias,C.P.Costa,O.A.D.Moreira,F.Peripolli,V.Oliveira Júnior,J.M.Schwegler,E.Rauber,L.P.Bianchi,I. group-housed individual stalls pregnancy phase sow ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy on reproductive performance and animal welfare parameters. After artificial insemination protocol, 524 females were divided into two gestation housing systems: PEN1=animals housed in individual stalls during the breeding and after group-housed; PEN32=animals housed in individual stalls from breeding until 32 days of pregnancy and after group-housed. The number of piglets born, and the pregnancy and farrowing rates were evaluated. Welfare parameters related to the pregnancy phase were used. Females who weaned more piglets in the previous farrowing had a higher number of piglets born at the next farrowing. The pregnancy rate was affected by the number of semen doses. The farrowing rate was not influenced by the evaluated parameters, with average value of 91.36%. There was no effect of the gestation housing system and the genetic lines on pregnancy and farrowing rates, with values above 90.0%. The animal welfare indicators showed more compromised parameters in PEN1 system. PEN1 system did not impair the reproductive performance although it presented more compromised animal welfare parameters.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de VeterináriaArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.72 n.5 20202020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352020000501675en10.1590/1678-4162-11767
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Bampi,D.
Borstnez,K.K.
Dias,C.P.
Costa,O.A.D.
Moreira,F.
Peripolli,V.
Oliveira Júnior,J.M.
Schwegler,E.
Rauber,L.P.
Bianchi,I.
spellingShingle Bampi,D.
Borstnez,K.K.
Dias,C.P.
Costa,O.A.D.
Moreira,F.
Peripolli,V.
Oliveira Júnior,J.M.
Schwegler,E.
Rauber,L.P.
Bianchi,I.
Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
author_facet Bampi,D.
Borstnez,K.K.
Dias,C.P.
Costa,O.A.D.
Moreira,F.
Peripolli,V.
Oliveira Júnior,J.M.
Schwegler,E.
Rauber,L.P.
Bianchi,I.
author_sort Bampi,D.
title Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_short Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_full Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_fullStr Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_sort evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
description ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy on reproductive performance and animal welfare parameters. After artificial insemination protocol, 524 females were divided into two gestation housing systems: PEN1=animals housed in individual stalls during the breeding and after group-housed; PEN32=animals housed in individual stalls from breeding until 32 days of pregnancy and after group-housed. The number of piglets born, and the pregnancy and farrowing rates were evaluated. Welfare parameters related to the pregnancy phase were used. Females who weaned more piglets in the previous farrowing had a higher number of piglets born at the next farrowing. The pregnancy rate was affected by the number of semen doses. The farrowing rate was not influenced by the evaluated parameters, with average value of 91.36%. There was no effect of the gestation housing system and the genetic lines on pregnancy and farrowing rates, with values above 90.0%. The animal welfare indicators showed more compromised parameters in PEN1 system. PEN1 system did not impair the reproductive performance although it presented more compromised animal welfare parameters.
publisher Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352020000501675
work_keys_str_mv AT bampid evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT borstnezkk evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT diascp evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT costaoad evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT moreiraf evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT peripolliv evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT oliveirajuniorjm evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT schweglere evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT rauberlp evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
AT bianchii evaluationofreproductiveandanimalwelfareparametersofswinefemalesofdifferentgeneticlinessubmittedtodifferentreproductivemanagementandhousingsystemsduringpregnancy
_version_ 1756395842665709568