Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo
Democracy and efficiency: hard relations between politics and economy. Many economists see politics as an irrational activity. They also think state action usually generates market inefficiencies and democratic institutions, such as elections, often work as obstacles to sound economic measures. Showing that vision has been embedded into the main currents of economic thought since the last century, we also argue those ideas are exported to great part of contemporary political science, including the area of public policies. Examining the literature, we show that rational choice political scientists, as the economists, claim governability and effective decisions will be guaranteed mainly through concentrated arenas or through insulated arrangements able to protect policy makers from political interference. In other words, governability depends on the reduction of the political arenas. On the contrary, we reject this technocratic solution of splitting politics from economy. With the support of classical pluralist thinkers, we stand another conception, arguing politics is the privileged social space for building interests and values in an institutionalized way. The difficulties to surpass current international crises since 2008 reveal this is a crucial problem: reducing politics would prevent societies from improving institutional solutions which are the only ones able to give space to emerging conflicts and, then, reach eventual consensus around them.
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Centro de Economia Política
2012
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572012000400005 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0101-31572012000400005 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0101-315720120004000052013-01-21Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneoLoureiro,Maria RitaAbrucio,Fernando Luiz democracy economic efficiency mainstream economics political science rational choice theory Democracy and efficiency: hard relations between politics and economy. Many economists see politics as an irrational activity. They also think state action usually generates market inefficiencies and democratic institutions, such as elections, often work as obstacles to sound economic measures. Showing that vision has been embedded into the main currents of economic thought since the last century, we also argue those ideas are exported to great part of contemporary political science, including the area of public policies. Examining the literature, we show that rational choice political scientists, as the economists, claim governability and effective decisions will be guaranteed mainly through concentrated arenas or through insulated arrangements able to protect policy makers from political interference. In other words, governability depends on the reduction of the political arenas. On the contrary, we reject this technocratic solution of splitting politics from economy. With the support of classical pluralist thinkers, we stand another conception, arguing politics is the privileged social space for building interests and values in an institutionalized way. The difficulties to surpass current international crises since 2008 reveal this is a crucial problem: reducing politics would prevent societies from improving institutional solutions which are the only ones able to give space to emerging conflicts and, then, reach eventual consensus around them.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCentro de Economia PolíticaBrazilian Journal of Political Economy v.32 n.4 20122012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572012000400005pt10.1590/S0101-31572012000400005 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Digital |
author |
Loureiro,Maria Rita Abrucio,Fernando Luiz |
spellingShingle |
Loureiro,Maria Rita Abrucio,Fernando Luiz Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo |
author_facet |
Loureiro,Maria Rita Abrucio,Fernando Luiz |
author_sort |
Loureiro,Maria Rita |
title |
Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo |
title_short |
Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo |
title_full |
Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo |
title_fullStr |
Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo |
title_sort |
democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo |
description |
Democracy and efficiency: hard relations between politics and economy. Many economists see politics as an irrational activity. They also think state action usually generates market inefficiencies and democratic institutions, such as elections, often work as obstacles to sound economic measures. Showing that vision has been embedded into the main currents of economic thought since the last century, we also argue those ideas are exported to great part of contemporary political science, including the area of public policies. Examining the literature, we show that rational choice political scientists, as the economists, claim governability and effective decisions will be guaranteed mainly through concentrated arenas or through insulated arrangements able to protect policy makers from political interference. In other words, governability depends on the reduction of the political arenas. On the contrary, we reject this technocratic solution of splitting politics from economy. With the support of classical pluralist thinkers, we stand another conception, arguing politics is the privileged social space for building interests and values in an institutionalized way. The difficulties to surpass current international crises since 2008 reveal this is a crucial problem: reducing politics would prevent societies from improving institutional solutions which are the only ones able to give space to emerging conflicts and, then, reach eventual consensus around them. |
publisher |
Centro de Economia Política |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572012000400005 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT loureiromariarita democraciaeeficienciaadificilrelacaoentrepoliticaeeconomianodebatecontemporaneo AT abruciofernandoluiz democraciaeeficienciaadificilrelacaoentrepoliticaeeconomianodebatecontemporaneo |
_version_ |
1756392979969343488 |