Weber e Schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedor

Weber and Schumpeter: the Economic action of the entrepreneur. Is there any specificity to be raised in the relations established between entrepreneurs and institutions? Recently, the term entrepreneurship is being widely employed. Enterprising is not anymore a restricted activity to the private sector, but also the Third Sector and the Public Administration. It does not only circumscribe the space of innovation, but also of the adapting changes. In this sense, such elastic concept runs the risk to lose consistency. It seems to be appropriate, therefore, to rescue the meaning that many authors, considered classic in Social Sciences, had attributed to the subject, to show that, although deep socioeconomic transformations occurred since Schumpeter wrote the Theory of the Economic Development, is still necessary to emphasize a basic dimension of the enterprising action: resistance and institutional conflict.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martes,Ana Cristina Braga
Format: Digital revista
Language:Portuguese
Published: Centro de Economia Política 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000200005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0101-31572010000200005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0101-315720100002000052010-05-21Weber e Schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedorMartes,Ana Cristina Braga entrepreneurial Innovation economic sociology institutional conflict Weber and Schumpeter: the Economic action of the entrepreneur. Is there any specificity to be raised in the relations established between entrepreneurs and institutions? Recently, the term entrepreneurship is being widely employed. Enterprising is not anymore a restricted activity to the private sector, but also the Third Sector and the Public Administration. It does not only circumscribe the space of innovation, but also of the adapting changes. In this sense, such elastic concept runs the risk to lose consistency. It seems to be appropriate, therefore, to rescue the meaning that many authors, considered classic in Social Sciences, had attributed to the subject, to show that, although deep socioeconomic transformations occurred since Schumpeter wrote the Theory of the Economic Development, is still necessary to emphasize a basic dimension of the enterprising action: resistance and institutional conflict.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCentro de Economia PolíticaBrazilian Journal of Political Economy v.30 n.2 20102010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000200005pt10.1590/S0101-31572010000200005
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language Portuguese
format Digital
author Martes,Ana Cristina Braga
spellingShingle Martes,Ana Cristina Braga
Weber e Schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedor
author_facet Martes,Ana Cristina Braga
author_sort Martes,Ana Cristina Braga
title Weber e Schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedor
title_short Weber e Schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedor
title_full Weber e Schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedor
title_fullStr Weber e Schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedor
title_full_unstemmed Weber e Schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedor
title_sort weber e schumpeter: a ação econômica do empreendedor
description Weber and Schumpeter: the Economic action of the entrepreneur. Is there any specificity to be raised in the relations established between entrepreneurs and institutions? Recently, the term entrepreneurship is being widely employed. Enterprising is not anymore a restricted activity to the private sector, but also the Third Sector and the Public Administration. It does not only circumscribe the space of innovation, but also of the adapting changes. In this sense, such elastic concept runs the risk to lose consistency. It seems to be appropriate, therefore, to rescue the meaning that many authors, considered classic in Social Sciences, had attributed to the subject, to show that, although deep socioeconomic transformations occurred since Schumpeter wrote the Theory of the Economic Development, is still necessary to emphasize a basic dimension of the enterprising action: resistance and institutional conflict.
publisher Centro de Economia Política
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000200005
work_keys_str_mv AT martesanacristinabraga webereschumpeteraacaoeconomicadoempreendedor
_version_ 1756392963065249792