Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between the gas exchange threshold (GET) and heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using three different exercise modalities. A further aim was to establish whether there was a 1:1 relationship between the percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage oxygen uptake reserve ( % V ˙ O 2 R) at intensities corresponding to GET and HRVT. Sixteen apparently healthy men 17 to 28 years of age performed three maximal CPETs (cycling, walking, and running). Mean heart rate and V ˙ O 2 at GET and HRVT were 16 bpm (P<0.001) and 5.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 (P=0.001) higher in running than cycling, but no significant differences were observed between running and walking, or cycling and walking (P>0.05). There was a strong relationship between GET and HRVT, with R2 ranging from 0.69 to 0.90. A 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R was not observed at GET and HRVT. The %HRR was higher during cycling (GET mean difference=7%; HRVT mean difference=11%; both P<0.001), walking (GET mean difference=13%; HRVT mean difference=13%; both P<0.001), or running (GET mean difference=11%; HRVT mean difference=10%; both P<0.001). Therefore, using HRVT to prescribe aerobic exercise intensity appears to be valid. However, to assume a 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R at HRVT would probably result in overestimation of the energy expenditure during the bout of exercise.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cunha,F.A., Montenegro,R.A., Midgley,A.W., Vasconcellos,F., Soares,P.P., Farinatti,P.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2014
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2014000800706
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0100-879X2014000800706
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0100-879X20140008007062019-07-03Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholdsCunha,F.A.Montenegro,R.A.Midgley,A.W.Vasconcellos,F.Soares,P.P.Farinatti,P. Aerobic exercise Autonomic nervous system Heart rate reserve Oxygen uptake reserve Poincare plot Ramp protocol The main purpose of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between the gas exchange threshold (GET) and heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using three different exercise modalities. A further aim was to establish whether there was a 1:1 relationship between the percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage oxygen uptake reserve ( % V ˙ O 2 R) at intensities corresponding to GET and HRVT. Sixteen apparently healthy men 17 to 28 years of age performed three maximal CPETs (cycling, walking, and running). Mean heart rate and V ˙ O 2 at GET and HRVT were 16 bpm (P<0.001) and 5.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 (P=0.001) higher in running than cycling, but no significant differences were observed between running and walking, or cycling and walking (P>0.05). There was a strong relationship between GET and HRVT, with R2 ranging from 0.69 to 0.90. A 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R was not observed at GET and HRVT. The %HRR was higher during cycling (GET mean difference=7%; HRVT mean difference=11%; both P<0.001), walking (GET mean difference=13%; HRVT mean difference=13%; both P<0.001), or running (GET mean difference=11%; HRVT mean difference=10%; both P<0.001). Therefore, using HRVT to prescribe aerobic exercise intensity appears to be valid. However, to assume a 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R at HRVT would probably result in overestimation of the energy expenditure during the bout of exercise.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação CientíficaBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.47 n.8 20142014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2014000800706en10.1590/1414-431x20143713
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Cunha,F.A.
Montenegro,R.A.
Midgley,A.W.
Vasconcellos,F.
Soares,P.P.
Farinatti,P.
spellingShingle Cunha,F.A.
Montenegro,R.A.
Midgley,A.W.
Vasconcellos,F.
Soares,P.P.
Farinatti,P.
Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
author_facet Cunha,F.A.
Montenegro,R.A.
Midgley,A.W.
Vasconcellos,F.
Soares,P.P.
Farinatti,P.
author_sort Cunha,F.A.
title Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_short Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_full Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_fullStr Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_full_unstemmed Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_sort influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
description The main purpose of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between the gas exchange threshold (GET) and heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using three different exercise modalities. A further aim was to establish whether there was a 1:1 relationship between the percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage oxygen uptake reserve ( % V ˙ O 2 R) at intensities corresponding to GET and HRVT. Sixteen apparently healthy men 17 to 28 years of age performed three maximal CPETs (cycling, walking, and running). Mean heart rate and V ˙ O 2 at GET and HRVT were 16 bpm (P<0.001) and 5.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 (P=0.001) higher in running than cycling, but no significant differences were observed between running and walking, or cycling and walking (P>0.05). There was a strong relationship between GET and HRVT, with R2 ranging from 0.69 to 0.90. A 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R was not observed at GET and HRVT. The %HRR was higher during cycling (GET mean difference=7%; HRVT mean difference=11%; both P<0.001), walking (GET mean difference=13%; HRVT mean difference=13%; both P<0.001), or running (GET mean difference=11%; HRVT mean difference=10%; both P<0.001). Therefore, using HRVT to prescribe aerobic exercise intensity appears to be valid. However, to assume a 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R at HRVT would probably result in overestimation of the energy expenditure during the bout of exercise.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
publishDate 2014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2014000800706
work_keys_str_mv AT cunhafa influenceofexercisemodalityonagreementbetweengasexchangeandheartratevariabilitythresholds
AT montenegrora influenceofexercisemodalityonagreementbetweengasexchangeandheartratevariabilitythresholds
AT midgleyaw influenceofexercisemodalityonagreementbetweengasexchangeandheartratevariabilitythresholds
AT vasconcellosf influenceofexercisemodalityonagreementbetweengasexchangeandheartratevariabilitythresholds
AT soarespp influenceofexercisemodalityonagreementbetweengasexchangeandheartratevariabilitythresholds
AT farinattip influenceofexercisemodalityonagreementbetweengasexchangeandheartratevariabilitythresholds
_version_ 1756391449998393344