Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of fetal weight prediction by ultrasonography labor employing a formula including the linear measurements of femur length (FL) and mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness (STT). Methods We conducted a prospective study involving singleton uncomplicated term pregnancies within 48 hours of delivery. Only pregnancies with a cephalic fetus admitted in the labor ward for elective cesarean section, induction of labor or spontaneous labor were included. We excluded all non-Caucasian women, the ones previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes and the ones with evidence of ruptured membranes. Fetal weight estimates were calculated using a previously proposed formula [estimated fetal weight = [1] 1687.47 + (54.1 x FL) + (76.68 x STT). The relationship between actual birth weight and estimated fetal weight was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. The formula's performance was assessed by calculating the signed and absolute errors. Mean weight difference and signed percentage error were calculated for birth weight divided into three subgroups: < 3000 g; 3000-4000g; and > 4000 g. Results We included for analysis 145 cases and found a significant, yet low, linear relationship between birth weight and estimated fetal weight (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.197) with an absolute mean error of 10.6%. The lowest mean percentage error (0.3%) corresponded to the subgroup with birth weight between 3000 g and 4000 g. Conclusions This study demonstrates a poor correlation between actual birth weight and the estimated fetal weight using a formula based on femur length and mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness, both linear parameters. Although avoidance of circumferential ultrasound measurements might prove to be beneficial, it is still yet to be found a fetal estimation formula that can be both accurate and simple to perform.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barros,Joana Goulão, Reis,Inês, Pereira,Isabel, Clode,Nuno, Graça,Luís M.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032016000100004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0100-72032016000100004
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0100-720320160001000042016-01-18Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a ChallengeBarros,Joana GoulãoReis,InêsPereira,IsabelClode,NunoGraça,Luís M. estimation fetal weight labor macrossomia low birth weight Objective To evaluate the accuracy of fetal weight prediction by ultrasonography labor employing a formula including the linear measurements of femur length (FL) and mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness (STT). Methods We conducted a prospective study involving singleton uncomplicated term pregnancies within 48 hours of delivery. Only pregnancies with a cephalic fetus admitted in the labor ward for elective cesarean section, induction of labor or spontaneous labor were included. We excluded all non-Caucasian women, the ones previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes and the ones with evidence of ruptured membranes. Fetal weight estimates were calculated using a previously proposed formula [estimated fetal weight = [1] 1687.47 + (54.1 x FL) + (76.68 x STT). The relationship between actual birth weight and estimated fetal weight was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. The formula's performance was assessed by calculating the signed and absolute errors. Mean weight difference and signed percentage error were calculated for birth weight divided into three subgroups: < 3000 g; 3000-4000g; and > 4000 g. Results We included for analysis 145 cases and found a significant, yet low, linear relationship between birth weight and estimated fetal weight (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.197) with an absolute mean error of 10.6%. The lowest mean percentage error (0.3%) corresponded to the subgroup with birth weight between 3000 g and 4000 g. Conclusions This study demonstrates a poor correlation between actual birth weight and the estimated fetal weight using a formula based on femur length and mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness, both linear parameters. Although avoidance of circumferential ultrasound measurements might prove to be beneficial, it is still yet to be found a fetal estimation formula that can be both accurate and simple to perform.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFederação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e ObstetríciaRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.38 n.1 20162016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032016000100004en10.1055/s-0035-1570110
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Barros,Joana Goulão
Reis,Inês
Pereira,Isabel
Clode,Nuno
Graça,Luís M.
spellingShingle Barros,Joana Goulão
Reis,Inês
Pereira,Isabel
Clode,Nuno
Graça,Luís M.
Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge
author_facet Barros,Joana Goulão
Reis,Inês
Pereira,Isabel
Clode,Nuno
Graça,Luís M.
author_sort Barros,Joana Goulão
title Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge
title_short Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge
title_full Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge
title_fullStr Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge
title_sort estimation of fetal weight during labor: still a challenge
description Objective To evaluate the accuracy of fetal weight prediction by ultrasonography labor employing a formula including the linear measurements of femur length (FL) and mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness (STT). Methods We conducted a prospective study involving singleton uncomplicated term pregnancies within 48 hours of delivery. Only pregnancies with a cephalic fetus admitted in the labor ward for elective cesarean section, induction of labor or spontaneous labor were included. We excluded all non-Caucasian women, the ones previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes and the ones with evidence of ruptured membranes. Fetal weight estimates were calculated using a previously proposed formula [estimated fetal weight = [1] 1687.47 + (54.1 x FL) + (76.68 x STT). The relationship between actual birth weight and estimated fetal weight was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. The formula's performance was assessed by calculating the signed and absolute errors. Mean weight difference and signed percentage error were calculated for birth weight divided into three subgroups: < 3000 g; 3000-4000g; and > 4000 g. Results We included for analysis 145 cases and found a significant, yet low, linear relationship between birth weight and estimated fetal weight (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.197) with an absolute mean error of 10.6%. The lowest mean percentage error (0.3%) corresponded to the subgroup with birth weight between 3000 g and 4000 g. Conclusions This study demonstrates a poor correlation between actual birth weight and the estimated fetal weight using a formula based on femur length and mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness, both linear parameters. Although avoidance of circumferential ultrasound measurements might prove to be beneficial, it is still yet to be found a fetal estimation formula that can be both accurate and simple to perform.
publisher Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032016000100004
work_keys_str_mv AT barrosjoanagoulao estimationoffetalweightduringlaborstillachallenge
AT reisines estimationoffetalweightduringlaborstillachallenge
AT pereiraisabel estimationoffetalweightduringlaborstillachallenge
AT clodenuno estimationoffetalweightduringlaborstillachallenge
AT gracaluism estimationoffetalweightduringlaborstillachallenge
_version_ 1756389747961364480