DETERMINATION OF SOIL VOLUME BY PLANIALTIMETRIC SURVEY METHODS

ABSTRACT Considering the importance of topographic surveys to determine soil volumes and study efficient and accessible alternatives for this operation, this study aimed to analyze methods and respective equipment for planialtimetric surveys to determine soil volume. An experimental grid was installed in an area locate in Fernandópolis, SP, Brazil, in which quotas were measured by geometric leveling (standard method), trigonometric leveling, leveling with receivers of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) by relative (frequencies L1/L2) and absolute positioning (code C/A) and extraction of altitudes in digital terrain model from SRTM and ASTER images. In comparison to geometric leveling, trigonometric leveling was the most accurate in determining soil volume (0.6% error), followed by GNSS leveling by relative positioning (23.7% error), and extraction of altitudes by SRTM (32.0% error) and ASTER images (38.3% error). GNSS leveling by absolute positioning presented the highest error in determining soil volume (287.4%) compared to the other methods.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vanzela,Luiz S., Araujo Junior,Osvaldo, Lima,Ronaldo C.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162020000200207
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0100-69162020000200207
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0100-691620200002002072020-04-15DETERMINATION OF SOIL VOLUME BY PLANIALTIMETRIC SURVEY METHODSVanzela,Luiz S.Araujo Junior,OsvaldoLima,Ronaldo C. GNSS geometric leveling trigonometric leveling geomatics ABSTRACT Considering the importance of topographic surveys to determine soil volumes and study efficient and accessible alternatives for this operation, this study aimed to analyze methods and respective equipment for planialtimetric surveys to determine soil volume. An experimental grid was installed in an area locate in Fernandópolis, SP, Brazil, in which quotas were measured by geometric leveling (standard method), trigonometric leveling, leveling with receivers of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) by relative (frequencies L1/L2) and absolute positioning (code C/A) and extraction of altitudes in digital terrain model from SRTM and ASTER images. In comparison to geometric leveling, trigonometric leveling was the most accurate in determining soil volume (0.6% error), followed by GNSS leveling by relative positioning (23.7% error), and extraction of altitudes by SRTM (32.0% error) and ASTER images (38.3% error). GNSS leveling by absolute positioning presented the highest error in determining soil volume (287.4%) compared to the other methods.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de Engenharia AgrícolaEngenharia Agrícola v.40 n.2 20202020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162020000200207en10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v40n2p207-214/2020
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Vanzela,Luiz S.
Araujo Junior,Osvaldo
Lima,Ronaldo C.
spellingShingle Vanzela,Luiz S.
Araujo Junior,Osvaldo
Lima,Ronaldo C.
DETERMINATION OF SOIL VOLUME BY PLANIALTIMETRIC SURVEY METHODS
author_facet Vanzela,Luiz S.
Araujo Junior,Osvaldo
Lima,Ronaldo C.
author_sort Vanzela,Luiz S.
title DETERMINATION OF SOIL VOLUME BY PLANIALTIMETRIC SURVEY METHODS
title_short DETERMINATION OF SOIL VOLUME BY PLANIALTIMETRIC SURVEY METHODS
title_full DETERMINATION OF SOIL VOLUME BY PLANIALTIMETRIC SURVEY METHODS
title_fullStr DETERMINATION OF SOIL VOLUME BY PLANIALTIMETRIC SURVEY METHODS
title_full_unstemmed DETERMINATION OF SOIL VOLUME BY PLANIALTIMETRIC SURVEY METHODS
title_sort determination of soil volume by planialtimetric survey methods
description ABSTRACT Considering the importance of topographic surveys to determine soil volumes and study efficient and accessible alternatives for this operation, this study aimed to analyze methods and respective equipment for planialtimetric surveys to determine soil volume. An experimental grid was installed in an area locate in Fernandópolis, SP, Brazil, in which quotas were measured by geometric leveling (standard method), trigonometric leveling, leveling with receivers of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) by relative (frequencies L1/L2) and absolute positioning (code C/A) and extraction of altitudes in digital terrain model from SRTM and ASTER images. In comparison to geometric leveling, trigonometric leveling was the most accurate in determining soil volume (0.6% error), followed by GNSS leveling by relative positioning (23.7% error), and extraction of altitudes by SRTM (32.0% error) and ASTER images (38.3% error). GNSS leveling by absolute positioning presented the highest error in determining soil volume (287.4%) compared to the other methods.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162020000200207
work_keys_str_mv AT vanzelaluizs determinationofsoilvolumebyplanialtimetricsurveymethods
AT araujojuniorosvaldo determinationofsoilvolumebyplanialtimetricsurveymethods
AT limaronaldoc determinationofsoilvolumebyplanialtimetricsurveymethods
_version_ 1756389083047788544