Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography

Abstract Objective: To test the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) for the quantification of abdominal fat in correlation with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical assessments. Materials and Methods: Using ultrasound and CT, we determined the thickness of subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat in 101 subjects-of whom 39 (38.6%) were men and 62 (61.4%) were women-with a mean age of 66.3 years (60-80 years). The ultrasound data were correlated with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters, as well as with the areas measured by abdominal CT. Results: Intra-abdominal thickness was the variable for which the correlation with the areas of abdominal fat was strongest (i.e., the correlation coefficient was highest). We also tested the reproducibility of ultrasound and CT for the assessment of abdominal fat and found that CT measurements of abdominal fat showed greater reproducibility, having higher intraobserver and interobserver reliability than had the ultrasound measurements. There was a significant correlation between ultrasound and CT, with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Conclusion: In the assessment of abdominal fat, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability were greater for CT than for ultrasound, although both methods showed high accuracy and good reproducibility.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mauad,Fernando Marum, Chagas-Neto,Francisco Abaeté, Benedeti,Augusto César Garcia Saab, Nogueira-Barbosa,Marcello Henrique, Muglia,Valdair Francisco, Carneiro,Antonio Adilton Oliveira, Muller,Enrico Mattana, Elias Junior,Jorge
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842017000300141
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0100-39842017000300141
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0100-398420170003001412017-07-03Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomographyMauad,Fernando MarumChagas-Neto,Francisco AbaetéBenedeti,Augusto César Garcia SaabNogueira-Barbosa,Marcello HenriqueMuglia,Valdair FranciscoCarneiro,Antonio Adilton OliveiraMuller,Enrico MattanaElias Junior,Jorge Abdominal fat Ultrasonography Computed tomography Radiology Abstract Objective: To test the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) for the quantification of abdominal fat in correlation with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical assessments. Materials and Methods: Using ultrasound and CT, we determined the thickness of subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat in 101 subjects-of whom 39 (38.6%) were men and 62 (61.4%) were women-with a mean age of 66.3 years (60-80 years). The ultrasound data were correlated with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters, as well as with the areas measured by abdominal CT. Results: Intra-abdominal thickness was the variable for which the correlation with the areas of abdominal fat was strongest (i.e., the correlation coefficient was highest). We also tested the reproducibility of ultrasound and CT for the assessment of abdominal fat and found that CT measurements of abdominal fat showed greater reproducibility, having higher intraobserver and interobserver reliability than had the ultrasound measurements. There was a significant correlation between ultrasound and CT, with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Conclusion: In the assessment of abdominal fat, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability were greater for CT than for ultrasound, although both methods showed high accuracy and good reproducibility.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPublicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por ImagemRadiologia Brasileira v.50 n.3 20172017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842017000300141en10.1590/0100-3984.2016.0023
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Mauad,Fernando Marum
Chagas-Neto,Francisco Abaeté
Benedeti,Augusto César Garcia Saab
Nogueira-Barbosa,Marcello Henrique
Muglia,Valdair Francisco
Carneiro,Antonio Adilton Oliveira
Muller,Enrico Mattana
Elias Junior,Jorge
spellingShingle Mauad,Fernando Marum
Chagas-Neto,Francisco Abaeté
Benedeti,Augusto César Garcia Saab
Nogueira-Barbosa,Marcello Henrique
Muglia,Valdair Francisco
Carneiro,Antonio Adilton Oliveira
Muller,Enrico Mattana
Elias Junior,Jorge
Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography
author_facet Mauad,Fernando Marum
Chagas-Neto,Francisco Abaeté
Benedeti,Augusto César Garcia Saab
Nogueira-Barbosa,Marcello Henrique
Muglia,Valdair Francisco
Carneiro,Antonio Adilton Oliveira
Muller,Enrico Mattana
Elias Junior,Jorge
author_sort Mauad,Fernando Marum
title Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography
title_short Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography
title_full Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography
title_fullStr Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography
title_sort reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography
description Abstract Objective: To test the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) for the quantification of abdominal fat in correlation with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical assessments. Materials and Methods: Using ultrasound and CT, we determined the thickness of subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat in 101 subjects-of whom 39 (38.6%) were men and 62 (61.4%) were women-with a mean age of 66.3 years (60-80 years). The ultrasound data were correlated with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters, as well as with the areas measured by abdominal CT. Results: Intra-abdominal thickness was the variable for which the correlation with the areas of abdominal fat was strongest (i.e., the correlation coefficient was highest). We also tested the reproducibility of ultrasound and CT for the assessment of abdominal fat and found that CT measurements of abdominal fat showed greater reproducibility, having higher intraobserver and interobserver reliability than had the ultrasound measurements. There was a significant correlation between ultrasound and CT, with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Conclusion: In the assessment of abdominal fat, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability were greater for CT than for ultrasound, although both methods showed high accuracy and good reproducibility.
publisher Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842017000300141
work_keys_str_mv AT mauadfernandomarum reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography
AT chagasnetofranciscoabaete reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography
AT benedetiaugustocesargarciasaab reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography
AT nogueirabarbosamarcellohenrique reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography
AT mugliavaldairfrancisco reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography
AT carneiroantonioadiltonoliveira reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography
AT mullerenricomattana reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography
AT eliasjuniorjorge reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography
_version_ 1756386859007606784