Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography
Abstract Objective: To test the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) for the quantification of abdominal fat in correlation with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical assessments. Materials and Methods: Using ultrasound and CT, we determined the thickness of subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat in 101 subjects-of whom 39 (38.6%) were men and 62 (61.4%) were women-with a mean age of 66.3 years (60-80 years). The ultrasound data were correlated with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters, as well as with the areas measured by abdominal CT. Results: Intra-abdominal thickness was the variable for which the correlation with the areas of abdominal fat was strongest (i.e., the correlation coefficient was highest). We also tested the reproducibility of ultrasound and CT for the assessment of abdominal fat and found that CT measurements of abdominal fat showed greater reproducibility, having higher intraobserver and interobserver reliability than had the ultrasound measurements. There was a significant correlation between ultrasound and CT, with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Conclusion: In the assessment of abdominal fat, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability were greater for CT than for ultrasound, although both methods showed high accuracy and good reproducibility.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
2017
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842017000300141 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842017000300141 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0100-398420170003001412017-07-03Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomographyMauad,Fernando MarumChagas-Neto,Francisco AbaetéBenedeti,Augusto César Garcia SaabNogueira-Barbosa,Marcello HenriqueMuglia,Valdair FranciscoCarneiro,Antonio Adilton OliveiraMuller,Enrico MattanaElias Junior,Jorge Abdominal fat Ultrasonography Computed tomography Radiology Abstract Objective: To test the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) for the quantification of abdominal fat in correlation with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical assessments. Materials and Methods: Using ultrasound and CT, we determined the thickness of subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat in 101 subjects-of whom 39 (38.6%) were men and 62 (61.4%) were women-with a mean age of 66.3 years (60-80 years). The ultrasound data were correlated with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters, as well as with the areas measured by abdominal CT. Results: Intra-abdominal thickness was the variable for which the correlation with the areas of abdominal fat was strongest (i.e., the correlation coefficient was highest). We also tested the reproducibility of ultrasound and CT for the assessment of abdominal fat and found that CT measurements of abdominal fat showed greater reproducibility, having higher intraobserver and interobserver reliability than had the ultrasound measurements. There was a significant correlation between ultrasound and CT, with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Conclusion: In the assessment of abdominal fat, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability were greater for CT than for ultrasound, although both methods showed high accuracy and good reproducibility.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPublicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por ImagemRadiologia Brasileira v.50 n.3 20172017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842017000300141en10.1590/0100-3984.2016.0023 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Mauad,Fernando Marum Chagas-Neto,Francisco Abaeté Benedeti,Augusto César Garcia Saab Nogueira-Barbosa,Marcello Henrique Muglia,Valdair Francisco Carneiro,Antonio Adilton Oliveira Muller,Enrico Mattana Elias Junior,Jorge |
spellingShingle |
Mauad,Fernando Marum Chagas-Neto,Francisco Abaeté Benedeti,Augusto César Garcia Saab Nogueira-Barbosa,Marcello Henrique Muglia,Valdair Francisco Carneiro,Antonio Adilton Oliveira Muller,Enrico Mattana Elias Junior,Jorge Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography |
author_facet |
Mauad,Fernando Marum Chagas-Neto,Francisco Abaeté Benedeti,Augusto César Garcia Saab Nogueira-Barbosa,Marcello Henrique Muglia,Valdair Francisco Carneiro,Antonio Adilton Oliveira Muller,Enrico Mattana Elias Junior,Jorge |
author_sort |
Mauad,Fernando Marum |
title |
Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography |
title_short |
Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography |
title_full |
Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography |
title_fullStr |
Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography |
title_sort |
reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography |
description |
Abstract Objective: To test the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) for the quantification of abdominal fat in correlation with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical assessments. Materials and Methods: Using ultrasound and CT, we determined the thickness of subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat in 101 subjects-of whom 39 (38.6%) were men and 62 (61.4%) were women-with a mean age of 66.3 years (60-80 years). The ultrasound data were correlated with the anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters, as well as with the areas measured by abdominal CT. Results: Intra-abdominal thickness was the variable for which the correlation with the areas of abdominal fat was strongest (i.e., the correlation coefficient was highest). We also tested the reproducibility of ultrasound and CT for the assessment of abdominal fat and found that CT measurements of abdominal fat showed greater reproducibility, having higher intraobserver and interobserver reliability than had the ultrasound measurements. There was a significant correlation between ultrasound and CT, with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Conclusion: In the assessment of abdominal fat, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability were greater for CT than for ultrasound, although both methods showed high accuracy and good reproducibility. |
publisher |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842017000300141 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mauadfernandomarum reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography AT chagasnetofranciscoabaete reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography AT benedetiaugustocesargarciasaab reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography AT nogueirabarbosamarcellohenrique reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography AT mugliavaldairfrancisco reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography AT carneiroantonioadiltonoliveira reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography AT mullerenricomattana reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography AT eliasjuniorjorge reproducibilityofabdominalfatassessmentbyultrasoundandcomputedtomography |
_version_ |
1756386859007606784 |