Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications

Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda, Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa, Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de, Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho, Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes, Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2014
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0100-39842014000100028
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0100-398420140001000282016-03-24Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcificationsBrasileiro Junior,Vilson LacerdaLuna,Aníbal Henrique BarbosaSales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira deRodrigues,Tânia Lemos CoelhoSarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca AbrantesMello Junior,Carlos Fernando de Carotid artery calcification End-stage renal disease Panoramic radiography Ultrasonography Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPublicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por ImagemRadiologia Brasileira v.47 n.1 20142014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028en10.1590/S0100-39842014000100011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa
Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de
Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho
Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes
Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de
spellingShingle Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa
Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de
Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho
Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes
Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
author_facet Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa
Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de
Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho
Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes
Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de
author_sort Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
title Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_short Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_full Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_fullStr Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_sort reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
description Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications.
publisher Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publishDate 2014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028
work_keys_str_mv AT brasileirojuniorvilsonlacerda reliabilityofdigitalpanoramicradiographyinthediagnosisofcarotidarterycalcifications
AT lunaanibalhenriquebarbosa reliabilityofdigitalpanoramicradiographyinthediagnosisofcarotidarterycalcifications
AT salesmarceloaugustooliveirade reliabilityofdigitalpanoramicradiographyinthediagnosisofcarotidarterycalcifications
AT rodriguestanialemoscoelho reliabilityofdigitalpanoramicradiographyinthediagnosisofcarotidarterycalcifications
AT sarmentopriscillalopesdafonsecaabrantes reliabilityofdigitalpanoramicradiographyinthediagnosisofcarotidarterycalcifications
AT mellojuniorcarlosfernandode reliabilityofdigitalpanoramicradiographyinthediagnosisofcarotidarterycalcifications
_version_ 1756386810520403968