Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemic

Abstract Objective: To test the explanatory power of coping strategies and intolerance of uncertainty on men’s perceived stress levels and test the moderating role of coping strategies in the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress during the Covid-19 pandemic. Method: This was an online cross-sectional study in which 1,006 men living in Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic participated. Participants were recruited using a snowball sampling technique and completed a questionnaire containing measures of all study variables. Data were examined using a correlation and a regression analysis. Results: Intolerance of uncertainty (β = .51) and refusal (β = .15) positively predicted perceived stress, whereas control (β = –.31) and isolation (β = –.06) negatively predicted it. Together, these variables explained 52% of men’s perceived stress (p < .001). Isolation and social support lessened the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress (p < .001). Conclusion: Men high in intolerance of uncertainty and refusal were more vulnerable to stress during the pandemic. However, coping helped mitigate the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress, thus being a promising psychosocial intervention in this context.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Palma,Emanuel Missias Silva, Reis de Sousa,Anderson, Andrade de Morais,Franciane, Evangelista Luz,Ramon, Freitas Neto,Álvaro Lima, Lima,Pâmela Pitágoras Freitas
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100409
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0080-62342022000100409
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0080-623420220001004092022-01-04Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemicPalma,Emanuel Missias SilvaReis de Sousa,AndersonAndrade de Morais,FrancianeEvangelista Luz,RamonFreitas Neto,Álvaro LimaLima,Pâmela Pitágoras Freitas Men’s health Mental health Psychological adaption Psychological stress Covid-19 Abstract Objective: To test the explanatory power of coping strategies and intolerance of uncertainty on men’s perceived stress levels and test the moderating role of coping strategies in the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress during the Covid-19 pandemic. Method: This was an online cross-sectional study in which 1,006 men living in Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic participated. Participants were recruited using a snowball sampling technique and completed a questionnaire containing measures of all study variables. Data were examined using a correlation and a regression analysis. Results: Intolerance of uncertainty (β = .51) and refusal (β = .15) positively predicted perceived stress, whereas control (β = –.31) and isolation (β = –.06) negatively predicted it. Together, these variables explained 52% of men’s perceived stress (p < .001). Isolation and social support lessened the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress (p < .001). Conclusion: Men high in intolerance of uncertainty and refusal were more vulnerable to stress during the pandemic. However, coping helped mitigate the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress, thus being a promising psychosocial intervention in this context.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de EnfermagemRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.56 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100409en10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2021-0303
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Palma,Emanuel Missias Silva
Reis de Sousa,Anderson
Andrade de Morais,Franciane
Evangelista Luz,Ramon
Freitas Neto,Álvaro Lima
Lima,Pâmela Pitágoras Freitas
spellingShingle Palma,Emanuel Missias Silva
Reis de Sousa,Anderson
Andrade de Morais,Franciane
Evangelista Luz,Ramon
Freitas Neto,Álvaro Lima
Lima,Pâmela Pitágoras Freitas
Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemic
author_facet Palma,Emanuel Missias Silva
Reis de Sousa,Anderson
Andrade de Morais,Franciane
Evangelista Luz,Ramon
Freitas Neto,Álvaro Lima
Lima,Pâmela Pitágoras Freitas
author_sort Palma,Emanuel Missias Silva
title Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_short Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_sort coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the covid-19 pandemic
description Abstract Objective: To test the explanatory power of coping strategies and intolerance of uncertainty on men’s perceived stress levels and test the moderating role of coping strategies in the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress during the Covid-19 pandemic. Method: This was an online cross-sectional study in which 1,006 men living in Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic participated. Participants were recruited using a snowball sampling technique and completed a questionnaire containing measures of all study variables. Data were examined using a correlation and a regression analysis. Results: Intolerance of uncertainty (β = .51) and refusal (β = .15) positively predicted perceived stress, whereas control (β = –.31) and isolation (β = –.06) negatively predicted it. Together, these variables explained 52% of men’s perceived stress (p < .001). Isolation and social support lessened the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress (p < .001). Conclusion: Men high in intolerance of uncertainty and refusal were more vulnerable to stress during the pandemic. However, coping helped mitigate the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress, thus being a promising psychosocial intervention in this context.
publisher Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100409
work_keys_str_mv AT palmaemanuelmissiassilva copingmoderatestherelationshipbetweenintoleranceofuncertaintyandstressinmenduringthecovid19pandemic
AT reisdesousaanderson copingmoderatestherelationshipbetweenintoleranceofuncertaintyandstressinmenduringthecovid19pandemic
AT andradedemoraisfranciane copingmoderatestherelationshipbetweenintoleranceofuncertaintyandstressinmenduringthecovid19pandemic
AT evangelistaluzramon copingmoderatestherelationshipbetweenintoleranceofuncertaintyandstressinmenduringthecovid19pandemic
AT freitasnetoalvarolima copingmoderatestherelationshipbetweenintoleranceofuncertaintyandstressinmenduringthecovid19pandemic
AT limapamelapitagorasfreitas copingmoderatestherelationshipbetweenintoleranceofuncertaintyandstressinmenduringthecovid19pandemic
_version_ 1756384524657229824