Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up

Abstract Background: The use of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED), such as the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), is increasing. The number of leads may vary according to the device. Lead placement in the left ventricle increases surgical time and may be associated with greater morbidity after hospital discharge, an event that is often confused with the underlying disease severity. Objective: To evaluate the rate of unscheduled emergency hospitalizations and death after implantable device surgery stratified by the type of device. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 199 patients submitted to cardiac device implantation. The groups were stratified according to the type of device: ICD group (n = 124) and CRT group (n = 75). Probability estimates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to the outcome. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant in the statistical analyses. Results: Most of the sample comprised male patients (71.9%), with a mean age of 61.1 ± 14.2. Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between the groups (CRT 37.4 ± 18.1 vs. ICD 39.1 ± 17.0, p = 0.532). The rate of unscheduled visits to the emergency unit related to the device was 4.8% in the ICD group and 10.6% in the CRT group (p = 0.20). The probability of device-related survival of the variable “death” was different between the groups (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Patients after CRT implantation show a higher probability of mortality after surgery at a follow-up of less than 1 year. The rate of unscheduled hospital visits, related or not to the implant, does not differ between the groups.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Warpechowski Neto,Stefan, Ley,Laura Lessa Gaudie, Almeida,Eduardo Dytz, Saffi,Marco Aurélio Lumertz, Dutra,Luiza Zwan, Ley,Antonio Lessa Gaudie, Sant'Anna,Roberto Tofani, Lima,Gustavo Glotz de, Kalil,Renato Abdala Karam, Leiria,Tiago Luiz Luz
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2019000500491
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0066-782X2019000500491
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0066-782X20190005004912019-07-31Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow UpWarpechowski Neto,StefanLey,Laura Lessa GaudieAlmeida,Eduardo DytzSaffi,Marco Aurélio LumertzDutra,Luiza ZwanLey,Antonio Lessa GaudieSant'Anna,Roberto TofaniLima,Gustavo Glotz deKalil,Renato Abdala KaramLeiria,Tiago Luiz Luz Defibrillators, Implantable Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices Patient Readmission Mortality Abstract Background: The use of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED), such as the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), is increasing. The number of leads may vary according to the device. Lead placement in the left ventricle increases surgical time and may be associated with greater morbidity after hospital discharge, an event that is often confused with the underlying disease severity. Objective: To evaluate the rate of unscheduled emergency hospitalizations and death after implantable device surgery stratified by the type of device. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 199 patients submitted to cardiac device implantation. The groups were stratified according to the type of device: ICD group (n = 124) and CRT group (n = 75). Probability estimates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to the outcome. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant in the statistical analyses. Results: Most of the sample comprised male patients (71.9%), with a mean age of 61.1 ± 14.2. Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between the groups (CRT 37.4 ± 18.1 vs. ICD 39.1 ± 17.0, p = 0.532). The rate of unscheduled visits to the emergency unit related to the device was 4.8% in the ICD group and 10.6% in the CRT group (p = 0.20). The probability of device-related survival of the variable “death” was different between the groups (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Patients after CRT implantation show a higher probability of mortality after surgery at a follow-up of less than 1 year. The rate of unscheduled hospital visits, related or not to the implant, does not differ between the groups.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBCArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.112 n.5 20192019-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2019000500491en10.5935/abc.20190018
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Warpechowski Neto,Stefan
Ley,Laura Lessa Gaudie
Almeida,Eduardo Dytz
Saffi,Marco Aurélio Lumertz
Dutra,Luiza Zwan
Ley,Antonio Lessa Gaudie
Sant'Anna,Roberto Tofani
Lima,Gustavo Glotz de
Kalil,Renato Abdala Karam
Leiria,Tiago Luiz Luz
spellingShingle Warpechowski Neto,Stefan
Ley,Laura Lessa Gaudie
Almeida,Eduardo Dytz
Saffi,Marco Aurélio Lumertz
Dutra,Luiza Zwan
Ley,Antonio Lessa Gaudie
Sant'Anna,Roberto Tofani
Lima,Gustavo Glotz de
Kalil,Renato Abdala Karam
Leiria,Tiago Luiz Luz
Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up
author_facet Warpechowski Neto,Stefan
Ley,Laura Lessa Gaudie
Almeida,Eduardo Dytz
Saffi,Marco Aurélio Lumertz
Dutra,Luiza Zwan
Ley,Antonio Lessa Gaudie
Sant'Anna,Roberto Tofani
Lima,Gustavo Glotz de
Kalil,Renato Abdala Karam
Leiria,Tiago Luiz Luz
author_sort Warpechowski Neto,Stefan
title Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up
title_short Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up
title_full Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up
title_fullStr Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up
title_full_unstemmed Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up
title_sort unscheduled emergency visits after cardiac devices implantation: comparison between cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in less than one year of follow up
description Abstract Background: The use of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED), such as the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), is increasing. The number of leads may vary according to the device. Lead placement in the left ventricle increases surgical time and may be associated with greater morbidity after hospital discharge, an event that is often confused with the underlying disease severity. Objective: To evaluate the rate of unscheduled emergency hospitalizations and death after implantable device surgery stratified by the type of device. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 199 patients submitted to cardiac device implantation. The groups were stratified according to the type of device: ICD group (n = 124) and CRT group (n = 75). Probability estimates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to the outcome. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant in the statistical analyses. Results: Most of the sample comprised male patients (71.9%), with a mean age of 61.1 ± 14.2. Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between the groups (CRT 37.4 ± 18.1 vs. ICD 39.1 ± 17.0, p = 0.532). The rate of unscheduled visits to the emergency unit related to the device was 4.8% in the ICD group and 10.6% in the CRT group (p = 0.20). The probability of device-related survival of the variable “death” was different between the groups (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Patients after CRT implantation show a higher probability of mortality after surgery at a follow-up of less than 1 year. The rate of unscheduled hospital visits, related or not to the implant, does not differ between the groups.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2019000500491
work_keys_str_mv AT warpechowskinetostefan unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT leylauralessagaudie unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT almeidaeduardodytz unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT saffimarcoaureliolumertz unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT dutraluizazwan unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT leyantoniolessagaudie unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT santannarobertotofani unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT limagustavoglotzde unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT kalilrenatoabdalakaram unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
AT leiriatiagoluizluz unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup
_version_ 1756382146225766400