Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up
Abstract Background: The use of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED), such as the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), is increasing. The number of leads may vary according to the device. Lead placement in the left ventricle increases surgical time and may be associated with greater morbidity after hospital discharge, an event that is often confused with the underlying disease severity. Objective: To evaluate the rate of unscheduled emergency hospitalizations and death after implantable device surgery stratified by the type of device. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 199 patients submitted to cardiac device implantation. The groups were stratified according to the type of device: ICD group (n = 124) and CRT group (n = 75). Probability estimates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to the outcome. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant in the statistical analyses. Results: Most of the sample comprised male patients (71.9%), with a mean age of 61.1 ± 14.2. Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between the groups (CRT 37.4 ± 18.1 vs. ICD 39.1 ± 17.0, p = 0.532). The rate of unscheduled visits to the emergency unit related to the device was 4.8% in the ICD group and 10.6% in the CRT group (p = 0.20). The probability of device-related survival of the variable “death” was different between the groups (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Patients after CRT implantation show a higher probability of mortality after surgery at a follow-up of less than 1 year. The rate of unscheduled hospital visits, related or not to the implant, does not differ between the groups.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
2019
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2019000500491 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0066-782X2019000500491 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0066-782X20190005004912019-07-31Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow UpWarpechowski Neto,StefanLey,Laura Lessa GaudieAlmeida,Eduardo DytzSaffi,Marco Aurélio LumertzDutra,Luiza ZwanLey,Antonio Lessa GaudieSant'Anna,Roberto TofaniLima,Gustavo Glotz deKalil,Renato Abdala KaramLeiria,Tiago Luiz Luz Defibrillators, Implantable Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices Patient Readmission Mortality Abstract Background: The use of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED), such as the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), is increasing. The number of leads may vary according to the device. Lead placement in the left ventricle increases surgical time and may be associated with greater morbidity after hospital discharge, an event that is often confused with the underlying disease severity. Objective: To evaluate the rate of unscheduled emergency hospitalizations and death after implantable device surgery stratified by the type of device. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 199 patients submitted to cardiac device implantation. The groups were stratified according to the type of device: ICD group (n = 124) and CRT group (n = 75). Probability estimates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to the outcome. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant in the statistical analyses. Results: Most of the sample comprised male patients (71.9%), with a mean age of 61.1 ± 14.2. Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between the groups (CRT 37.4 ± 18.1 vs. ICD 39.1 ± 17.0, p = 0.532). The rate of unscheduled visits to the emergency unit related to the device was 4.8% in the ICD group and 10.6% in the CRT group (p = 0.20). The probability of device-related survival of the variable “death” was different between the groups (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Patients after CRT implantation show a higher probability of mortality after surgery at a follow-up of less than 1 year. The rate of unscheduled hospital visits, related or not to the implant, does not differ between the groups.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBCArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.112 n.5 20192019-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2019000500491en10.5935/abc.20190018 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Warpechowski Neto,Stefan Ley,Laura Lessa Gaudie Almeida,Eduardo Dytz Saffi,Marco Aurélio Lumertz Dutra,Luiza Zwan Ley,Antonio Lessa Gaudie Sant'Anna,Roberto Tofani Lima,Gustavo Glotz de Kalil,Renato Abdala Karam Leiria,Tiago Luiz Luz |
spellingShingle |
Warpechowski Neto,Stefan Ley,Laura Lessa Gaudie Almeida,Eduardo Dytz Saffi,Marco Aurélio Lumertz Dutra,Luiza Zwan Ley,Antonio Lessa Gaudie Sant'Anna,Roberto Tofani Lima,Gustavo Glotz de Kalil,Renato Abdala Karam Leiria,Tiago Luiz Luz Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up |
author_facet |
Warpechowski Neto,Stefan Ley,Laura Lessa Gaudie Almeida,Eduardo Dytz Saffi,Marco Aurélio Lumertz Dutra,Luiza Zwan Ley,Antonio Lessa Gaudie Sant'Anna,Roberto Tofani Lima,Gustavo Glotz de Kalil,Renato Abdala Karam Leiria,Tiago Luiz Luz |
author_sort |
Warpechowski Neto,Stefan |
title |
Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up |
title_short |
Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up |
title_full |
Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up |
title_fullStr |
Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up |
title_sort |
unscheduled emergency visits after cardiac devices implantation: comparison between cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in less than one year of follow up |
description |
Abstract Background: The use of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED), such as the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), is increasing. The number of leads may vary according to the device. Lead placement in the left ventricle increases surgical time and may be associated with greater morbidity after hospital discharge, an event that is often confused with the underlying disease severity. Objective: To evaluate the rate of unscheduled emergency hospitalizations and death after implantable device surgery stratified by the type of device. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 199 patients submitted to cardiac device implantation. The groups were stratified according to the type of device: ICD group (n = 124) and CRT group (n = 75). Probability estimates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to the outcome. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant in the statistical analyses. Results: Most of the sample comprised male patients (71.9%), with a mean age of 61.1 ± 14.2. Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between the groups (CRT 37.4 ± 18.1 vs. ICD 39.1 ± 17.0, p = 0.532). The rate of unscheduled visits to the emergency unit related to the device was 4.8% in the ICD group and 10.6% in the CRT group (p = 0.20). The probability of device-related survival of the variable “death” was different between the groups (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Patients after CRT implantation show a higher probability of mortality after surgery at a follow-up of less than 1 year. The rate of unscheduled hospital visits, related or not to the implant, does not differ between the groups. |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2019000500491 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT warpechowskinetostefan unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT leylauralessagaudie unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT almeidaeduardodytz unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT saffimarcoaureliolumertz unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT dutraluizazwan unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT leyantoniolessagaudie unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT santannarobertotofani unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT limagustavoglotzde unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT kalilrenatoabdalakaram unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup AT leiriatiagoluizluz unscheduledemergencyvisitsaftercardiacdevicesimplantationcomparisonbetweencardioverterdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinlessthanoneyearoffollowup |
_version_ |
1756382146225766400 |