Comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the day

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influences of circadian variations on tilt-table testing (TTT) results by comparing the positivity rate of the test performed during the morning with that of the test performed in the afternoon and to evaluate the reproducibility of the results in different periods of the day. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients with recurrent unexplained syncope or near-syncope referred for TTT were randomized into 2 groups. In group I, 68 patients, TTT was performed first in the afternoon and then in the morning. In group II, 55 patients, the test was performed first in the morning and then in the afternoon. RESULTS: The TTT protocol was the prolonged passive test, without drug sensitization. Twenty-nine (23.5%) patients had a positive result in at least one of the periods. The positivity rate for each period was similar: 20 (16.2%) patients in the afternoon and 19 (15.4%) in the morning (p=1.000). Total reproducibility (positive/positive and negative/negative) was observed in 49 (89%) patients in group I and in 55 (81%) in group II. Reproducibility of the results was obtained in 94 (90.4%) patients with first negative tests but in 10 (34%) patients with first positive tests. CONCLUSION: TTT could be performed during any period of the day, and even in the 2 periods to enhance positivity. Considering the low reproducibility rate of the positive tests, serial TTT to evaluate therapeutic efficacy should be performed during the same period of the day.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wu,Tan Chen, Hachul,Denise, Scanavacca,Mauricio, Sosa,Eduardo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2002
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2002001300006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0066-782X2002001300006
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0066-782X20020013000062002-11-06Comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the dayWu,Tan ChenHachul,DeniseScanavacca,MauricioSosa,Eduardo tilt-table testing circadian variation vasovagal syncope OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influences of circadian variations on tilt-table testing (TTT) results by comparing the positivity rate of the test performed during the morning with that of the test performed in the afternoon and to evaluate the reproducibility of the results in different periods of the day. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients with recurrent unexplained syncope or near-syncope referred for TTT were randomized into 2 groups. In group I, 68 patients, TTT was performed first in the afternoon and then in the morning. In group II, 55 patients, the test was performed first in the morning and then in the afternoon. RESULTS: The TTT protocol was the prolonged passive test, without drug sensitization. Twenty-nine (23.5%) patients had a positive result in at least one of the periods. The positivity rate for each period was similar: 20 (16.2%) patients in the afternoon and 19 (15.4%) in the morning (p=1.000). Total reproducibility (positive/positive and negative/negative) was observed in 49 (89%) patients in group I and in 55 (81%) in group II. Reproducibility of the results was obtained in 94 (90.4%) patients with first negative tests but in 10 (34%) patients with first positive tests. CONCLUSION: TTT could be performed during any period of the day, and even in the 2 periods to enhance positivity. Considering the low reproducibility rate of the positive tests, serial TTT to evaluate therapeutic efficacy should be performed during the same period of the day.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBCArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.79 n.4 20022002-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2002001300006en10.1590/S0066-782X2002001300006
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Wu,Tan Chen
Hachul,Denise
Scanavacca,Mauricio
Sosa,Eduardo
spellingShingle Wu,Tan Chen
Hachul,Denise
Scanavacca,Mauricio
Sosa,Eduardo
Comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the day
author_facet Wu,Tan Chen
Hachul,Denise
Scanavacca,Mauricio
Sosa,Eduardo
author_sort Wu,Tan Chen
title Comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the day
title_short Comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the day
title_full Comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the day
title_fullStr Comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the day
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the day
title_sort comparison between tilt-table testing results performed during different periods of the day
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influences of circadian variations on tilt-table testing (TTT) results by comparing the positivity rate of the test performed during the morning with that of the test performed in the afternoon and to evaluate the reproducibility of the results in different periods of the day. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients with recurrent unexplained syncope or near-syncope referred for TTT were randomized into 2 groups. In group I, 68 patients, TTT was performed first in the afternoon and then in the morning. In group II, 55 patients, the test was performed first in the morning and then in the afternoon. RESULTS: The TTT protocol was the prolonged passive test, without drug sensitization. Twenty-nine (23.5%) patients had a positive result in at least one of the periods. The positivity rate for each period was similar: 20 (16.2%) patients in the afternoon and 19 (15.4%) in the morning (p=1.000). Total reproducibility (positive/positive and negative/negative) was observed in 49 (89%) patients in group I and in 55 (81%) in group II. Reproducibility of the results was obtained in 94 (90.4%) patients with first negative tests but in 10 (34%) patients with first positive tests. CONCLUSION: TTT could be performed during any period of the day, and even in the 2 periods to enhance positivity. Considering the low reproducibility rate of the positive tests, serial TTT to evaluate therapeutic efficacy should be performed during the same period of the day.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publishDate 2002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2002001300006
work_keys_str_mv AT wutanchen comparisonbetweentilttabletestingresultsperformedduringdifferentperiodsoftheday
AT hachuldenise comparisonbetweentilttabletestingresultsperformedduringdifferentperiodsoftheday
AT scanavaccamauricio comparisonbetweentilttabletestingresultsperformedduringdifferentperiodsoftheday
AT sosaeduardo comparisonbetweentilttabletestingresultsperformedduringdifferentperiodsoftheday
_version_ 1756381469391978496