Temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: The case of Australopithecus sediba

In attempting to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of fossil taxa, researchers can use evidence from two sources - morphology and known temporal ranges. For most taxa, the available evidence is stronger for one of these data sources. We examined the limitations of temporal data for reconstructing hominin evolutionary relationships, specifically focusing on the hypothesised ancestor-descendant relationship between Australopithecus sediba and the genus Homo. Some have implied that because the only known specimens of A. sediba are dated to later than the earliest fossils attributed to Homo, the former species is precluded from being ancestral to the latter. However, A. sediba is currently known from one site dated to 1.98 Ma and, thus, its actual temporal range is unknown. Using data from the currently known temporal ranges of fossil hominin species, and incorporating dating error in the analysis, we estimate that the average hominin species' temporal range is ~0.97 Myr, which is lower than most figures suggested for mammalian species generally. Using this conservative figure in a thought experiment in which the Malapa specimens are hypothesised to represent the last appearance date, the middle of the temporal range, and first appearance date for the species, the first appearance date of A. sediba would be 2.95, 2.47 and 1.98 Ma, respectively. As these scenarios are all equally plausible, and 2.95 Ma predates the earliest specimens that some have attributed to Homo, we cannot refute the hypothesis that the species A. sediba is ancestral to our genus based solely on currently available temporal data. SIGNIFICANCE: • We correct a common misconception in palaeoanthropology that a species currently known only from later in time than another species cannot be ancestral to it. • On temporal grounds alone one cannot dismiss the possibility that A. sediba could be ancestral to the genus Homo.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robinson,Chris, Campbell,Timothy L., Cote,Susanne, de Ruiter,Darryl J.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2018
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532018000200020
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0038-23532018000200020
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0038-235320180002000202020-02-12Temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: The case of Australopithecus sedibaRobinson,ChrisCampbell,Timothy L.Cote,Susannede Ruiter,Darryl J. sampling bias hominin temporal ranges FAD LAD genus Homo ancestry In attempting to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of fossil taxa, researchers can use evidence from two sources - morphology and known temporal ranges. For most taxa, the available evidence is stronger for one of these data sources. We examined the limitations of temporal data for reconstructing hominin evolutionary relationships, specifically focusing on the hypothesised ancestor-descendant relationship between Australopithecus sediba and the genus Homo. Some have implied that because the only known specimens of A. sediba are dated to later than the earliest fossils attributed to Homo, the former species is precluded from being ancestral to the latter. However, A. sediba is currently known from one site dated to 1.98 Ma and, thus, its actual temporal range is unknown. Using data from the currently known temporal ranges of fossil hominin species, and incorporating dating error in the analysis, we estimate that the average hominin species' temporal range is ~0.97 Myr, which is lower than most figures suggested for mammalian species generally. Using this conservative figure in a thought experiment in which the Malapa specimens are hypothesised to represent the last appearance date, the middle of the temporal range, and first appearance date for the species, the first appearance date of A. sediba would be 2.95, 2.47 and 1.98 Ma, respectively. As these scenarios are all equally plausible, and 2.95 Ma predates the earliest specimens that some have attributed to Homo, we cannot refute the hypothesis that the species A. sediba is ancestral to our genus based solely on currently available temporal data. SIGNIFICANCE: • We correct a common misconception in palaeoanthropology that a species currently known only from later in time than another species cannot be ancestral to it. • On temporal grounds alone one cannot dismiss the possibility that A. sediba could be ancestral to the genus Homo.Academy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science v.114 n.3-4 20182018-04-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532018000200020en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Robinson,Chris
Campbell,Timothy L.
Cote,Susanne
de Ruiter,Darryl J.
spellingShingle Robinson,Chris
Campbell,Timothy L.
Cote,Susanne
de Ruiter,Darryl J.
Temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: The case of Australopithecus sediba
author_facet Robinson,Chris
Campbell,Timothy L.
Cote,Susanne
de Ruiter,Darryl J.
author_sort Robinson,Chris
title Temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: The case of Australopithecus sediba
title_short Temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: The case of Australopithecus sediba
title_full Temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: The case of Australopithecus sediba
title_fullStr Temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: The case of Australopithecus sediba
title_full_unstemmed Temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: The case of Australopithecus sediba
title_sort temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: the case of australopithecus sediba
description In attempting to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of fossil taxa, researchers can use evidence from two sources - morphology and known temporal ranges. For most taxa, the available evidence is stronger for one of these data sources. We examined the limitations of temporal data for reconstructing hominin evolutionary relationships, specifically focusing on the hypothesised ancestor-descendant relationship between Australopithecus sediba and the genus Homo. Some have implied that because the only known specimens of A. sediba are dated to later than the earliest fossils attributed to Homo, the former species is precluded from being ancestral to the latter. However, A. sediba is currently known from one site dated to 1.98 Ma and, thus, its actual temporal range is unknown. Using data from the currently known temporal ranges of fossil hominin species, and incorporating dating error in the analysis, we estimate that the average hominin species' temporal range is ~0.97 Myr, which is lower than most figures suggested for mammalian species generally. Using this conservative figure in a thought experiment in which the Malapa specimens are hypothesised to represent the last appearance date, the middle of the temporal range, and first appearance date for the species, the first appearance date of A. sediba would be 2.95, 2.47 and 1.98 Ma, respectively. As these scenarios are all equally plausible, and 2.95 Ma predates the earliest specimens that some have attributed to Homo, we cannot refute the hypothesis that the species A. sediba is ancestral to our genus based solely on currently available temporal data. SIGNIFICANCE: • We correct a common misconception in palaeoanthropology that a species currently known only from later in time than another species cannot be ancestral to it. • On temporal grounds alone one cannot dismiss the possibility that A. sediba could be ancestral to the genus Homo.
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
publishDate 2018
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532018000200020
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonchris temporalrangesandancestryinthehomininfossilrecordthecaseofaustralopithecussediba
AT campbelltimothyl temporalrangesandancestryinthehomininfossilrecordthecaseofaustralopithecussediba
AT cotesusanne temporalrangesandancestryinthehomininfossilrecordthecaseofaustralopithecussediba
AT deruiterdarrylj temporalrangesandancestryinthehomininfossilrecordthecaseofaustralopithecussediba
_version_ 1756004856788680704