The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data

Following the publication (Granger DE et al., Nature 2015;522:85-88) of an 26Al/10Be burial isochron age of 3.67±0.16 Ma for the sediments encasing hominin fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'), we consider data on chert samples presented in that publication to explore alternative age interpretations. 10Be and 26Al concentrations determined on individual chert fragments within the sediments were calculated back in time, and data from one of these fragments point to a maximum age of 2.8 Ma for the sediment package and therefore also for the fossil. An alternative hypothesis is explored, which involves re-deposition and mixing of sediment that had previously collected over time in an upper chamber, which has since been eroded. We show that it is possible for such a scenario to yield ultimately an isochron indicating an apparent age much older than the depositional age of the sediments around the fossil. A possible scenario for deposition of StW573 in Member 2 would involve the formation of an opening between the Silberberg Grotto and an upper chamber. Not only could such an opening have acted as a death trap, but it could also have disturbed the sedimentological balance in the cave, allowing unconsolidated sediment to be washed into the Silberberg Grotto. This two-staged burial model would thus allow a younger age for the fossil, consistent with the sedimentology of the deposit. This alternative age is also not in contradiction to available faunal and palaeomagnetic data. SIGNIFICANCE: • Data on chert samples taken close to StW573 impose a maximum age for the fossil of 2.8 Ma - younger than the 3.67 Ma originally reported. We propose and explore a two-stage burial scenario to resolve the inconsistency and to reopen the discussion on the age of fossil StW573.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kramers,Jan D., Dirks,Paul H.G.M.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2017
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532017000200013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0038-23532017000200013
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0038-235320170002000132017-05-03The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial dataKramers,Jan D.Dirks,Paul H.G.M. dating cosmogenic nuclides muons Australopithecus prometheus burial history Following the publication (Granger DE et al., Nature 2015;522:85-88) of an 26Al/10Be burial isochron age of 3.67±0.16 Ma for the sediments encasing hominin fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'), we consider data on chert samples presented in that publication to explore alternative age interpretations. 10Be and 26Al concentrations determined on individual chert fragments within the sediments were calculated back in time, and data from one of these fragments point to a maximum age of 2.8 Ma for the sediment package and therefore also for the fossil. An alternative hypothesis is explored, which involves re-deposition and mixing of sediment that had previously collected over time in an upper chamber, which has since been eroded. We show that it is possible for such a scenario to yield ultimately an isochron indicating an apparent age much older than the depositional age of the sediments around the fossil. A possible scenario for deposition of StW573 in Member 2 would involve the formation of an opening between the Silberberg Grotto and an upper chamber. Not only could such an opening have acted as a death trap, but it could also have disturbed the sedimentological balance in the cave, allowing unconsolidated sediment to be washed into the Silberberg Grotto. This two-staged burial model would thus allow a younger age for the fossil, consistent with the sedimentology of the deposit. This alternative age is also not in contradiction to available faunal and palaeomagnetic data. SIGNIFICANCE: • Data on chert samples taken close to StW573 impose a maximum age for the fossil of 2.8 Ma - younger than the 3.67 Ma originally reported. We propose and explore a two-stage burial scenario to resolve the inconsistency and to reopen the discussion on the age of fossil StW573.Academy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science v.113 n.3-4 20172017-04-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532017000200013en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Kramers,Jan D.
Dirks,Paul H.G.M.
spellingShingle Kramers,Jan D.
Dirks,Paul H.G.M.
The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data
author_facet Kramers,Jan D.
Dirks,Paul H.G.M.
author_sort Kramers,Jan D.
title The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data
title_short The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data
title_full The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data
title_fullStr The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data
title_full_unstemmed The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data
title_sort age of fossil stw573 ('little foot'): an alternative interpretation of 26al/10be burial data
description Following the publication (Granger DE et al., Nature 2015;522:85-88) of an 26Al/10Be burial isochron age of 3.67±0.16 Ma for the sediments encasing hominin fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'), we consider data on chert samples presented in that publication to explore alternative age interpretations. 10Be and 26Al concentrations determined on individual chert fragments within the sediments were calculated back in time, and data from one of these fragments point to a maximum age of 2.8 Ma for the sediment package and therefore also for the fossil. An alternative hypothesis is explored, which involves re-deposition and mixing of sediment that had previously collected over time in an upper chamber, which has since been eroded. We show that it is possible for such a scenario to yield ultimately an isochron indicating an apparent age much older than the depositional age of the sediments around the fossil. A possible scenario for deposition of StW573 in Member 2 would involve the formation of an opening between the Silberberg Grotto and an upper chamber. Not only could such an opening have acted as a death trap, but it could also have disturbed the sedimentological balance in the cave, allowing unconsolidated sediment to be washed into the Silberberg Grotto. This two-staged burial model would thus allow a younger age for the fossil, consistent with the sedimentology of the deposit. This alternative age is also not in contradiction to available faunal and palaeomagnetic data. SIGNIFICANCE: • Data on chert samples taken close to StW573 impose a maximum age for the fossil of 2.8 Ma - younger than the 3.67 Ma originally reported. We propose and explore a two-stage burial scenario to resolve the inconsistency and to reopen the discussion on the age of fossil StW573.
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
publishDate 2017
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532017000200013
work_keys_str_mv AT kramersjand theageoffossilstw573littlefootanalternativeinterpretationof26al10beburialdata
AT dirkspaulhgm theageoffossilstw573littlefootanalternativeinterpretationof26al10beburialdata
AT kramersjand ageoffossilstw573littlefootanalternativeinterpretationof26al10beburialdata
AT dirkspaulhgm ageoffossilstw573littlefootanalternativeinterpretationof26al10beburialdata
_version_ 1756004839667531776