A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo

Teeth are the most common element in the fossil record and play a critical role in taxonomic assessments. Variability in extant hominoid species is commonly used as a basis to gauge expected ranges of variability in fossil hominin species. In this study, variability in lower first molars is visualised in morphospace for four extant hominoid species and seven fossil hominin species. A size-versus-shape-based principle component analysis plot was used to recognise spatial patterns applicable to sexual dimorphism in extant species for comparison with fossil hominin species. In three African great ape species, variability occurs predominantly according to size (rather than shape), with the gorilla sample further separating into a male and a female group according to size. A different pattern is apparent for the modern human sample, in which shape variability is more evident. There is overlap between male and female modern humans and some evidence of grouping by linguistic/tribal populations. When fossil hominin species are analysed using equivalent axes of variance, the specimens group around species holotypes in quite similar patterns to those of the extant African great apes, but six individual fossil molars fall well outside of polygons circumscribing holotype clusters; at least three of these specimens are of interest for discussion in the context of sexual dimorphism, species variability and current species classifications. An implication of this study is that, especially in the case of modern humans, great caution needs to be exercised in using extant species as analogues for assessing variability considered to be a result of sexual dimorphism in fossil hominin species.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dykes,Susan J.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2016
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532016000600021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0038-23532016000600021
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0038-235320160006000212017-01-10A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and HomoDykes,Susan J. Plio-Pleistocene molar variability taxonomy log se m analogue species Teeth are the most common element in the fossil record and play a critical role in taxonomic assessments. Variability in extant hominoid species is commonly used as a basis to gauge expected ranges of variability in fossil hominin species. In this study, variability in lower first molars is visualised in morphospace for four extant hominoid species and seven fossil hominin species. A size-versus-shape-based principle component analysis plot was used to recognise spatial patterns applicable to sexual dimorphism in extant species for comparison with fossil hominin species. In three African great ape species, variability occurs predominantly according to size (rather than shape), with the gorilla sample further separating into a male and a female group according to size. A different pattern is apparent for the modern human sample, in which shape variability is more evident. There is overlap between male and female modern humans and some evidence of grouping by linguistic/tribal populations. When fossil hominin species are analysed using equivalent axes of variance, the specimens group around species holotypes in quite similar patterns to those of the extant African great apes, but six individual fossil molars fall well outside of polygons circumscribing holotype clusters; at least three of these specimens are of interest for discussion in the context of sexual dimorphism, species variability and current species classifications. An implication of this study is that, especially in the case of modern humans, great caution needs to be exercised in using extant species as analogues for assessing variability considered to be a result of sexual dimorphism in fossil hominin species.Academy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science v.112 n.11-12 20162016-12-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532016000600021en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Dykes,Susan J.
spellingShingle Dykes,Susan J.
A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo
author_facet Dykes,Susan J.
author_sort Dykes,Susan J.
title A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo
title_short A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo
title_full A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo
title_fullStr A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo
title_full_unstemmed A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo
title_sort morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to australopithecus, paranthropus and homo
description Teeth are the most common element in the fossil record and play a critical role in taxonomic assessments. Variability in extant hominoid species is commonly used as a basis to gauge expected ranges of variability in fossil hominin species. In this study, variability in lower first molars is visualised in morphospace for four extant hominoid species and seven fossil hominin species. A size-versus-shape-based principle component analysis plot was used to recognise spatial patterns applicable to sexual dimorphism in extant species for comparison with fossil hominin species. In three African great ape species, variability occurs predominantly according to size (rather than shape), with the gorilla sample further separating into a male and a female group according to size. A different pattern is apparent for the modern human sample, in which shape variability is more evident. There is overlap between male and female modern humans and some evidence of grouping by linguistic/tribal populations. When fossil hominin species are analysed using equivalent axes of variance, the specimens group around species holotypes in quite similar patterns to those of the extant African great apes, but six individual fossil molars fall well outside of polygons circumscribing holotype clusters; at least three of these specimens are of interest for discussion in the context of sexual dimorphism, species variability and current species classifications. An implication of this study is that, especially in the case of modern humans, great caution needs to be exercised in using extant species as analogues for assessing variability considered to be a result of sexual dimorphism in fossil hominin species.
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
publishDate 2016
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532016000600021
work_keys_str_mv AT dykessusanj amorphometricanalysisofhomininteethattributedtoaustralopithecusparanthropusandhomo
AT dykessusanj morphometricanalysisofhomininteethattributedtoaustralopithecusparanthropusandhomo
_version_ 1756004835850715136