Thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia

In Colombia, pentavalent antimonials and miltefosine are the drugs of choice for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis; however, their toxicity, treatment duration, (treatment adherence problems), cost, and decreased parasite sensitivity make the search for alternative treatments of American cutaneous leishmaniasis necessary. Based on the results found in a controlled, open, randomized, phase III clinical trial, the efficacy and safety of miltefosine was compared to that of thermotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia. Adult patients from the Colombian army participated in the study; they received either 50 mg of miltefosine three times per day for 28 days by the oral route (n = 145) or a thermotherapy (Thermomed®) application of 50 °C for 30 seconds over the lesion and surrounding area (n = 149). Both groups were comparable with respect to their sociodemographic, clinical, and parasitological characteristics. The efficacy of miltefosine by protocol and by intention to treat was 70% (85/122 patients) and 69% (85/145 patients), respectively. The adverse effects were primarily gastrointestinal for miltefosine and pain at the lesion site after treatment for thermotherapy. No statistically significant difference was found in the efficacy analysis (intention to treat and protocol) between the two treatments. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00471705.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: López,Liliana, Cruz,Claudia, Godoy,Gonzalo, M. Robledo,Sara, D. Vélez,Iván
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-46652013000300197
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0036-46652013000300197
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0036-466520130003001972013-05-21Thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in ColombiaLópez,LilianaCruz,ClaudiaGodoy,GonzaloM. Robledo,SaraD. Vélez,Iván Thermotherapy Cutaneous leishmaniasis Miltefosine Treatment Efficacy Safety In Colombia, pentavalent antimonials and miltefosine are the drugs of choice for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis; however, their toxicity, treatment duration, (treatment adherence problems), cost, and decreased parasite sensitivity make the search for alternative treatments of American cutaneous leishmaniasis necessary. Based on the results found in a controlled, open, randomized, phase III clinical trial, the efficacy and safety of miltefosine was compared to that of thermotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia. Adult patients from the Colombian army participated in the study; they received either 50 mg of miltefosine three times per day for 28 days by the oral route (n = 145) or a thermotherapy (Thermomed®) application of 50 °C for 30 seconds over the lesion and surrounding area (n = 149). Both groups were comparable with respect to their sociodemographic, clinical, and parasitological characteristics. The efficacy of miltefosine by protocol and by intention to treat was 70% (85/122 patients) and 69% (85/145 patients), respectively. The adverse effects were primarily gastrointestinal for miltefosine and pain at the lesion site after treatment for thermotherapy. No statistically significant difference was found in the efficacy analysis (intention to treat and protocol) between the two treatments. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00471705.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Medicina Tropical de São PauloRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo v.55 n.3 20132013-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-46652013000300197en10.1590/S0036-46652013000300011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author López,Liliana
Cruz,Claudia
Godoy,Gonzalo
M. Robledo,Sara
D. Vélez,Iván
spellingShingle López,Liliana
Cruz,Claudia
Godoy,Gonzalo
M. Robledo,Sara
D. Vélez,Iván
Thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia
author_facet López,Liliana
Cruz,Claudia
Godoy,Gonzalo
M. Robledo,Sara
D. Vélez,Iván
author_sort López,Liliana
title Thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia
title_short Thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia
title_full Thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia
title_fullStr Thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia
title_sort thermoterapy effective and safer than miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in colombia
description In Colombia, pentavalent antimonials and miltefosine are the drugs of choice for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis; however, their toxicity, treatment duration, (treatment adherence problems), cost, and decreased parasite sensitivity make the search for alternative treatments of American cutaneous leishmaniasis necessary. Based on the results found in a controlled, open, randomized, phase III clinical trial, the efficacy and safety of miltefosine was compared to that of thermotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia. Adult patients from the Colombian army participated in the study; they received either 50 mg of miltefosine three times per day for 28 days by the oral route (n = 145) or a thermotherapy (Thermomed®) application of 50 °C for 30 seconds over the lesion and surrounding area (n = 149). Both groups were comparable with respect to their sociodemographic, clinical, and parasitological characteristics. The efficacy of miltefosine by protocol and by intention to treat was 70% (85/122 patients) and 69% (85/145 patients), respectively. The adverse effects were primarily gastrointestinal for miltefosine and pain at the lesion site after treatment for thermotherapy. No statistically significant difference was found in the efficacy analysis (intention to treat and protocol) between the two treatments. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00471705.
publisher Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-46652013000300197
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezliliana thermoterapyeffectiveandsaferthanmiltefosineinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisincolombia
AT cruzclaudia thermoterapyeffectiveandsaferthanmiltefosineinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisincolombia
AT godoygonzalo thermoterapyeffectiveandsaferthanmiltefosineinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisincolombia
AT mrobledosara thermoterapyeffectiveandsaferthanmiltefosineinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisincolombia
AT dvelezivan thermoterapyeffectiveandsaferthanmiltefosineinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisincolombia
_version_ 1756379872098254848