Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago

Background: Recently, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) proposed a new cardiovascular risk (CV) score. Aim: To evaluate the new risk score (ACC/AHA 2013) in a Chilean population. Material and Methods: Between 2002 and 2014, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile and fasting blood glucose levels were measured and a survey about CV risk factors was responded by 3,284 subjects aged 40 to 79 years (38% females), living in urban Santiago. ACC/AHA 2013, FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores were calculated. All-cause mortality was determined in July 2014 by consulting the Death Registry of the Chilean Identification Service, with an average follow up of 7 ± 3 years. Results: The prevalence of risk factors were 78% for dyslipidemia, 37% for hypertension, 20% for smoking, 7% for diabetes, 20% for obesity and 54% for physical inactivity. The mean FRAM, Chilean FRAM and ACC/AHA scores were 8, 3 and 9%, respectively. During follow-up, 94 participants died and 34 deaths were of cardiovascular cause. Participants who died had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p < 0. 01) and tended to be older (p = 0.06). The FRAM score for 10 years for deceased and surviving patients was 12 and 8%, respectively (p = NS). The figures for the Chilean FRAM were 5 and 2%, respectively (p = 0.09). The figures for the ACC/AHA 2013 score were 33 and 9%, respectively (p = 0.04). According to receiver operating characteristic curves, ACC/AHA 2013 had a higher area under de curve for CV mortality than FRAM and Chilean FRAM. Conclusions: The new ACC/AHA 2013 score, is better than traditional FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores in predicting cardiovascular mortality in a low risk population.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Acevedo,Mónica, Valentino,Giovanna, Kramer,Verónica, Bustamante,María José, Adasme,Marcela, Orellana,Lorena, Baraona,Fernando, Navarrete,Carlos
Format: Digital revista
Language:Spanish / Castilian
Published: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2017
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872017000300002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872017000300002
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720170003000022017-05-18Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en SantiagoAcevedo,MónicaValentino,GiovannaKramer,VerónicaBustamante,María JoséAdasme,MarcelaOrellana,LorenaBaraona,FernandoNavarrete,Carlos Preventive Medicine Cardiovascular Diseases Mortality Risk Factors Background: Recently, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) proposed a new cardiovascular risk (CV) score. Aim: To evaluate the new risk score (ACC/AHA 2013) in a Chilean population. Material and Methods: Between 2002 and 2014, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile and fasting blood glucose levels were measured and a survey about CV risk factors was responded by 3,284 subjects aged 40 to 79 years (38% females), living in urban Santiago. ACC/AHA 2013, FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores were calculated. All-cause mortality was determined in July 2014 by consulting the Death Registry of the Chilean Identification Service, with an average follow up of 7 ± 3 years. Results: The prevalence of risk factors were 78% for dyslipidemia, 37% for hypertension, 20% for smoking, 7% for diabetes, 20% for obesity and 54% for physical inactivity. The mean FRAM, Chilean FRAM and ACC/AHA scores were 8, 3 and 9%, respectively. During follow-up, 94 participants died and 34 deaths were of cardiovascular cause. Participants who died had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p < 0. 01) and tended to be older (p = 0.06). The FRAM score for 10 years for deceased and surviving patients was 12 and 8%, respectively (p = NS). The figures for the Chilean FRAM were 5 and 2%, respectively (p = 0.09). The figures for the ACC/AHA 2013 score were 33 and 9%, respectively (p = 0.04). According to receiver operating characteristic curves, ACC/AHA 2013 had a higher area under de curve for CV mortality than FRAM and Chilean FRAM. Conclusions: The new ACC/AHA 2013 score, is better than traditional FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores in predicting cardiovascular mortality in a low risk population.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.145 n.3 20172017-03-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872017000300002es10.4067/S0034-98872017000300002
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Chile
countrycode CL
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-cl
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language Spanish / Castilian
format Digital
author Acevedo,Mónica
Valentino,Giovanna
Kramer,Verónica
Bustamante,María José
Adasme,Marcela
Orellana,Lorena
Baraona,Fernando
Navarrete,Carlos
spellingShingle Acevedo,Mónica
Valentino,Giovanna
Kramer,Verónica
Bustamante,María José
Adasme,Marcela
Orellana,Lorena
Baraona,Fernando
Navarrete,Carlos
Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago
author_facet Acevedo,Mónica
Valentino,Giovanna
Kramer,Verónica
Bustamante,María José
Adasme,Marcela
Orellana,Lorena
Baraona,Fernando
Navarrete,Carlos
author_sort Acevedo,Mónica
title Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago
title_short Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago
title_full Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago
title_fullStr Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago
title_full_unstemmed Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago
title_sort superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo acc/aha 2013 por sobre el puntaje de framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en santiago
description Background: Recently, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) proposed a new cardiovascular risk (CV) score. Aim: To evaluate the new risk score (ACC/AHA 2013) in a Chilean population. Material and Methods: Between 2002 and 2014, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile and fasting blood glucose levels were measured and a survey about CV risk factors was responded by 3,284 subjects aged 40 to 79 years (38% females), living in urban Santiago. ACC/AHA 2013, FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores were calculated. All-cause mortality was determined in July 2014 by consulting the Death Registry of the Chilean Identification Service, with an average follow up of 7 ± 3 years. Results: The prevalence of risk factors were 78% for dyslipidemia, 37% for hypertension, 20% for smoking, 7% for diabetes, 20% for obesity and 54% for physical inactivity. The mean FRAM, Chilean FRAM and ACC/AHA scores were 8, 3 and 9%, respectively. During follow-up, 94 participants died and 34 deaths were of cardiovascular cause. Participants who died had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p < 0. 01) and tended to be older (p = 0.06). The FRAM score for 10 years for deceased and surviving patients was 12 and 8%, respectively (p = NS). The figures for the Chilean FRAM were 5 and 2%, respectively (p = 0.09). The figures for the ACC/AHA 2013 score were 33 and 9%, respectively (p = 0.04). According to receiver operating characteristic curves, ACC/AHA 2013 had a higher area under de curve for CV mortality than FRAM and Chilean FRAM. Conclusions: The new ACC/AHA 2013 score, is better than traditional FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores in predicting cardiovascular mortality in a low risk population.
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2017
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872017000300002
work_keys_str_mv AT acevedomonica superioridaddelnuevopuntajederiesgoaccaha2013porsobreelpuntajedeframinghamenlaprediccionderiesgodemortalidadcardiovascularensantiago
AT valentinogiovanna superioridaddelnuevopuntajederiesgoaccaha2013porsobreelpuntajedeframinghamenlaprediccionderiesgodemortalidadcardiovascularensantiago
AT kramerveronica superioridaddelnuevopuntajederiesgoaccaha2013porsobreelpuntajedeframinghamenlaprediccionderiesgodemortalidadcardiovascularensantiago
AT bustamantemariajose superioridaddelnuevopuntajederiesgoaccaha2013porsobreelpuntajedeframinghamenlaprediccionderiesgodemortalidadcardiovascularensantiago
AT adasmemarcela superioridaddelnuevopuntajederiesgoaccaha2013porsobreelpuntajedeframinghamenlaprediccionderiesgodemortalidadcardiovascularensantiago
AT orellanalorena superioridaddelnuevopuntajederiesgoaccaha2013porsobreelpuntajedeframinghamenlaprediccionderiesgodemortalidadcardiovascularensantiago
AT baraonafernando superioridaddelnuevopuntajederiesgoaccaha2013porsobreelpuntajedeframinghamenlaprediccionderiesgodemortalidadcardiovascularensantiago
AT navarretecarlos superioridaddelnuevopuntajederiesgoaccaha2013porsobreelpuntajedeframinghamenlaprediccionderiesgodemortalidadcardiovascularensantiago
_version_ 1755988547789127680