Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios
Background: The increasing frequency of systemic fungal infections and the emergence of secondary resistance to antifungals in the lasts years, has stimulated the use of methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. Etest(r) is an easily performed quantitative method that has a good agreement with the broth microdilution reference method (NCCLS), if appropriate media are used. Aim: To compare the susceptibility to Amphotericin B (AmB) and Fluconazole (Flu) of 22 opportunistic yeast isolates (C albicans (7), C tropicalis (9), C parapsilosis (3) and Cryptococcus neoformans (3) by Etest ®., using three different media and to choose the best medium for each tested drug. The studied media were RPMI 1640, Casitone (Cas) and Sabouraud. Results: The interpretation of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) endpoints on Sabouraud was difficult for AmB. The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains MICs were out of the acceptable range in this medium. RPMI and Cas were suitable media to test AmB and Flu, but best endpoints were obtained for AmB in RPMI and Flu in Cas. Conclusions: The use of appropriate media for each antifungal drug optimizes the MIC readings by Etest(r). AmB should be tested in RMPI and Flu in Cas. Sabouraud must not be used (Rev Méd Chile 2003; 131: 299-302).
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | Spanish / Castilian |
Published: |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago
2003
|
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872003000300008 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0034-98872003000300008 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0034-988720030003000082004-12-13Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 mediosTapia P,CeciliaLeón C,EugeniaPalavecino R,Elizabeth Antibiotics, antifungal Colony count, microbial Culture media Background: The increasing frequency of systemic fungal infections and the emergence of secondary resistance to antifungals in the lasts years, has stimulated the use of methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. Etest(r) is an easily performed quantitative method that has a good agreement with the broth microdilution reference method (NCCLS), if appropriate media are used. Aim: To compare the susceptibility to Amphotericin B (AmB) and Fluconazole (Flu) of 22 opportunistic yeast isolates (C albicans (7), C tropicalis (9), C parapsilosis (3) and Cryptococcus neoformans (3) by Etest ®., using three different media and to choose the best medium for each tested drug. The studied media were RPMI 1640, Casitone (Cas) and Sabouraud. Results: The interpretation of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) endpoints on Sabouraud was difficult for AmB. The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains MICs were out of the acceptable range in this medium. RPMI and Cas were suitable media to test AmB and Flu, but best endpoints were obtained for AmB in RPMI and Flu in Cas. Conclusions: The use of appropriate media for each antifungal drug optimizes the MIC readings by Etest(r). AmB should be tested in RMPI and Flu in Cas. Sabouraud must not be used (Rev Méd Chile 2003; 131: 299-302).info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.131 n.3 20032003-03-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872003000300008es10.4067/S0034-98872003000300008 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Chile |
countrycode |
CL |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-cl |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
Spanish / Castilian |
format |
Digital |
author |
Tapia P,Cecilia León C,Eugenia Palavecino R,Elizabeth |
spellingShingle |
Tapia P,Cecilia León C,Eugenia Palavecino R,Elizabeth Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios |
author_facet |
Tapia P,Cecilia León C,Eugenia Palavecino R,Elizabeth |
author_sort |
Tapia P,Cecilia |
title |
Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios |
title_short |
Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios |
title_full |
Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios |
title_fullStr |
Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios |
title_full_unstemmed |
Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios |
title_sort |
susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante etest ®: comparación de 3 medios |
description |
Background: The increasing frequency of systemic fungal infections and the emergence of secondary resistance to antifungals in the lasts years, has stimulated the use of methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. Etest(r) is an easily performed quantitative method that has a good agreement with the broth microdilution reference method (NCCLS), if appropriate media are used. Aim: To compare the susceptibility to Amphotericin B (AmB) and Fluconazole (Flu) of 22 opportunistic yeast isolates (C albicans (7), C tropicalis (9), C parapsilosis (3) and Cryptococcus neoformans (3) by Etest ®., using three different media and to choose the best medium for each tested drug. The studied media were RPMI 1640, Casitone (Cas) and Sabouraud. Results: The interpretation of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) endpoints on Sabouraud was difficult for AmB. The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains MICs were out of the acceptable range in this medium. RPMI and Cas were suitable media to test AmB and Flu, but best endpoints were obtained for AmB in RPMI and Flu in Cas. Conclusions: The use of appropriate media for each antifungal drug optimizes the MIC readings by Etest(r). AmB should be tested in RMPI and Flu in Cas. Sabouraud must not be used (Rev Méd Chile 2003; 131: 299-302). |
publisher |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago |
publishDate |
2003 |
url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872003000300008 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tapiapcecilia susceptibilidadantifungicadelevadurasmedianteetestcomparacionde3medios AT leonceugenia susceptibilidadantifungicadelevadurasmedianteetestcomparacionde3medios AT palavecinorelizabeth susceptibilidadantifungicadelevadurasmedianteetestcomparacionde3medios |
_version_ |
1755988098621112320 |