Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios

Background: The increasing frequency of systemic fungal infections and the emergence of secondary resistance to antifungals in the lasts years, has stimulated the use of methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. Etest(r) is an easily performed quantitative method that has a good agreement with the broth microdilution reference method (NCCLS), if appropriate media are used. Aim: To compare the susceptibility to Amphotericin B (AmB) and Fluconazole (Flu) of 22 opportunistic yeast isolates (C albicans (7), C tropicalis (9), C parapsilosis (3) and Cryptococcus neoformans (3) by Etest ®., using three different media and to choose the best medium for each tested drug. The studied media were RPMI 1640, Casitone (Cas) and Sabouraud. Results: The interpretation of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) endpoints on Sabouraud was difficult for AmB. The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains MICs were out of the acceptable range in this medium. RPMI and Cas were suitable media to test AmB and Flu, but best endpoints were obtained for AmB in RPMI and Flu in Cas. Conclusions: The use of appropriate media for each antifungal drug optimizes the MIC readings by Etest(r). AmB should be tested in RMPI and Flu in Cas. Sabouraud must not be used (Rev Méd Chile 2003; 131: 299-302).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tapia P,Cecilia, León C,Eugenia, Palavecino R,Elizabeth
Format: Digital revista
Language:Spanish / Castilian
Published: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2003
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872003000300008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872003000300008
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720030003000082004-12-13Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 mediosTapia P,CeciliaLeón C,EugeniaPalavecino R,Elizabeth Antibiotics, antifungal Colony count, microbial Culture media Background: The increasing frequency of systemic fungal infections and the emergence of secondary resistance to antifungals in the lasts years, has stimulated the use of methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. Etest(r) is an easily performed quantitative method that has a good agreement with the broth microdilution reference method (NCCLS), if appropriate media are used. Aim: To compare the susceptibility to Amphotericin B (AmB) and Fluconazole (Flu) of 22 opportunistic yeast isolates (C albicans (7), C tropicalis (9), C parapsilosis (3) and Cryptococcus neoformans (3) by Etest ®., using three different media and to choose the best medium for each tested drug. The studied media were RPMI 1640, Casitone (Cas) and Sabouraud. Results: The interpretation of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) endpoints on Sabouraud was difficult for AmB. The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains MICs were out of the acceptable range in this medium. RPMI and Cas were suitable media to test AmB and Flu, but best endpoints were obtained for AmB in RPMI and Flu in Cas. Conclusions: The use of appropriate media for each antifungal drug optimizes the MIC readings by Etest(r). AmB should be tested in RMPI and Flu in Cas. Sabouraud must not be used (Rev Méd Chile 2003; 131: 299-302).info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.131 n.3 20032003-03-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872003000300008es10.4067/S0034-98872003000300008
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Chile
countrycode CL
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-cl
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language Spanish / Castilian
format Digital
author Tapia P,Cecilia
León C,Eugenia
Palavecino R,Elizabeth
spellingShingle Tapia P,Cecilia
León C,Eugenia
Palavecino R,Elizabeth
Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios
author_facet Tapia P,Cecilia
León C,Eugenia
Palavecino R,Elizabeth
author_sort Tapia P,Cecilia
title Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios
title_short Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios
title_full Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios
title_fullStr Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios
title_full_unstemmed Susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante Etest ®: Comparación de 3 medios
title_sort susceptibilidad antifúngica de levaduras mediante etest ®: comparación de 3 medios
description Background: The increasing frequency of systemic fungal infections and the emergence of secondary resistance to antifungals in the lasts years, has stimulated the use of methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. Etest(r) is an easily performed quantitative method that has a good agreement with the broth microdilution reference method (NCCLS), if appropriate media are used. Aim: To compare the susceptibility to Amphotericin B (AmB) and Fluconazole (Flu) of 22 opportunistic yeast isolates (C albicans (7), C tropicalis (9), C parapsilosis (3) and Cryptococcus neoformans (3) by Etest ®., using three different media and to choose the best medium for each tested drug. The studied media were RPMI 1640, Casitone (Cas) and Sabouraud. Results: The interpretation of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) endpoints on Sabouraud was difficult for AmB. The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains MICs were out of the acceptable range in this medium. RPMI and Cas were suitable media to test AmB and Flu, but best endpoints were obtained for AmB in RPMI and Flu in Cas. Conclusions: The use of appropriate media for each antifungal drug optimizes the MIC readings by Etest(r). AmB should be tested in RMPI and Flu in Cas. Sabouraud must not be used (Rev Méd Chile 2003; 131: 299-302).
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2003
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872003000300008
work_keys_str_mv AT tapiapcecilia susceptibilidadantifungicadelevadurasmedianteetestcomparacionde3medios
AT leonceugenia susceptibilidadantifungicadelevadurasmedianteetestcomparacionde3medios
AT palavecinorelizabeth susceptibilidadantifungicadelevadurasmedianteetestcomparacionde3medios
_version_ 1755988098621112320