Radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológica

Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation is a known hazard of radiological procedures. Aim: To compare the emission of secondary ionizing radiation from two coronary angiographic equipments, one with digital and the other with analog image generation. To evaluate the effectiveness of external radiological protection devices. Material and methods: Environmental and fluoroscopy generated radiation in the cephalic region of the patient was measured during diagnostic coronary angiographies. Ionizing radiation generated in anterior left oblique projection (ALO) and in anterior right oblique projection (ARO) were measured with and without leaded protections. In 19 patients (group 1), a digital equipment was used and in 21 (group 2), an analog equipment. Results: Header radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 1194 ± 337 and 364 ± 222 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). During fluoroscopy and with leaded protection generated radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 612 ± 947 and 70 ± 61 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). For ALO projection, generated radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 105 ± 47 and 71 ± 192 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). During filming the radiation for ALO projection for groups 1 and 2 was 7252 ± 9569 and 1671 ± 2038 µGray/h respectively (p = 0.03). Out of the protection zone, registered radiation during fluoroscopy for groups 1 and 2 was 2800 ± 1741 and 1318 ± 954 µGray/h respectively (p < 0.001); during filming, the figures were 15500 ± 5840 and 18961 ± 10599 µGray/h respectively (NS). Conclusions: Digital radiological equipment has a lower level of ionizing radiation emission than the analog equipment. (Rev Méd Chile 2000; 128: 853-62).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramírez N,Alfredo, Farias Ch,Eric, Silva J,Ana María, Oyarzún C,Carlos, Leyton L,Fernando, Ugalde P,Héctor, Dussaillant N,Gastón, Cumsille G,Miguel Angel
Format: Digital revista
Language:Spanish / Castilian
Published: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2000
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872000000800004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872000000800004
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720000008000042005-11-29Radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológicaRamírez N,AlfredoFarias Ch,EricSilva J,Ana MaríaOyarzún C,CarlosLeyton L,FernandoUgalde P,HéctorDussaillant N,GastónCumsille G,Miguel Angel Coronary angiography Radiation, dosage Radiation ionising Radiation monitoring Radiation protection Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation is a known hazard of radiological procedures. Aim: To compare the emission of secondary ionizing radiation from two coronary angiographic equipments, one with digital and the other with analog image generation. To evaluate the effectiveness of external radiological protection devices. Material and methods: Environmental and fluoroscopy generated radiation in the cephalic region of the patient was measured during diagnostic coronary angiographies. Ionizing radiation generated in anterior left oblique projection (ALO) and in anterior right oblique projection (ARO) were measured with and without leaded protections. In 19 patients (group 1), a digital equipment was used and in 21 (group 2), an analog equipment. Results: Header radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 1194 ± 337 and 364 ± 222 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). During fluoroscopy and with leaded protection generated radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 612 ± 947 and 70 ± 61 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). For ALO projection, generated radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 105 ± 47 and 71 ± 192 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). During filming the radiation for ALO projection for groups 1 and 2 was 7252 ± 9569 and 1671 ± 2038 µGray/h respectively (p = 0.03). Out of the protection zone, registered radiation during fluoroscopy for groups 1 and 2 was 2800 ± 1741 and 1318 ± 954 µGray/h respectively (p < 0.001); during filming, the figures were 15500 ± 5840 and 18961 ± 10599 µGray/h respectively (NS). Conclusions: Digital radiological equipment has a lower level of ionizing radiation emission than the analog equipment. (Rev Méd Chile 2000; 128: 853-62).info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.128 n.8 20002000-08-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872000000800004es10.4067/S0034-98872000000800004
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Chile
countrycode CL
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-cl
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language Spanish / Castilian
format Digital
author Ramírez N,Alfredo
Farias Ch,Eric
Silva J,Ana María
Oyarzún C,Carlos
Leyton L,Fernando
Ugalde P,Héctor
Dussaillant N,Gastón
Cumsille G,Miguel Angel
spellingShingle Ramírez N,Alfredo
Farias Ch,Eric
Silva J,Ana María
Oyarzún C,Carlos
Leyton L,Fernando
Ugalde P,Héctor
Dussaillant N,Gastón
Cumsille G,Miguel Angel
Radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológica
author_facet Ramírez N,Alfredo
Farias Ch,Eric
Silva J,Ana María
Oyarzún C,Carlos
Leyton L,Fernando
Ugalde P,Héctor
Dussaillant N,Gastón
Cumsille G,Miguel Angel
author_sort Ramírez N,Alfredo
title Radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológica
title_short Radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológica
title_full Radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológica
title_fullStr Radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológica
title_full_unstemmed Radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológica
title_sort radiación ionizante secundaria generada en equipos de cineangiografía coronaria digital y analógica: influencia de los sistemas externos de protección radiológica
description Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation is a known hazard of radiological procedures. Aim: To compare the emission of secondary ionizing radiation from two coronary angiographic equipments, one with digital and the other with analog image generation. To evaluate the effectiveness of external radiological protection devices. Material and methods: Environmental and fluoroscopy generated radiation in the cephalic region of the patient was measured during diagnostic coronary angiographies. Ionizing radiation generated in anterior left oblique projection (ALO) and in anterior right oblique projection (ARO) were measured with and without leaded protections. In 19 patients (group 1), a digital equipment was used and in 21 (group 2), an analog equipment. Results: Header radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 1194 ± 337 and 364 ± 222 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). During fluoroscopy and with leaded protection generated radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 612 ± 947 and 70 ± 61 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). For ALO projection, generated radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 105 ± 47 and 71 ± 192 µGray/h respectively (p<0.001). During filming the radiation for ALO projection for groups 1 and 2 was 7252 ± 9569 and 1671 ± 2038 µGray/h respectively (p = 0.03). Out of the protection zone, registered radiation during fluoroscopy for groups 1 and 2 was 2800 ± 1741 and 1318 ± 954 µGray/h respectively (p < 0.001); during filming, the figures were 15500 ± 5840 and 18961 ± 10599 µGray/h respectively (NS). Conclusions: Digital radiological equipment has a lower level of ionizing radiation emission than the analog equipment. (Rev Méd Chile 2000; 128: 853-62).
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2000
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872000000800004
work_keys_str_mv AT ramireznalfredo radiacionionizantesecundariageneradaenequiposdecineangiografiacoronariadigitalyanalogicainfluenciadelossistemasexternosdeproteccionradiologica
AT fariascheric radiacionionizantesecundariageneradaenequiposdecineangiografiacoronariadigitalyanalogicainfluenciadelossistemasexternosdeproteccionradiologica
AT silvajanamaria radiacionionizantesecundariageneradaenequiposdecineangiografiacoronariadigitalyanalogicainfluenciadelossistemasexternosdeproteccionradiologica
AT oyarzunccarlos radiacionionizantesecundariageneradaenequiposdecineangiografiacoronariadigitalyanalogicainfluenciadelossistemasexternosdeproteccionradiologica
AT leytonlfernando radiacionionizantesecundariageneradaenequiposdecineangiografiacoronariadigitalyanalogicainfluenciadelossistemasexternosdeproteccionradiologica
AT ugaldephector radiacionionizantesecundariageneradaenequiposdecineangiografiacoronariadigitalyanalogicainfluenciadelossistemasexternosdeproteccionradiologica
AT dussaillantngaston radiacionionizantesecundariageneradaenequiposdecineangiografiacoronariadigitalyanalogicainfluenciadelossistemasexternosdeproteccionradiologica
AT cumsillegmiguelangel radiacionionizantesecundariageneradaenequiposdecineangiografiacoronariadigitalyanalogicainfluenciadelossistemasexternosdeproteccionradiologica
_version_ 1755988022571040768