Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the scheduling model influences the perception of the user about the quality of primary health care centers. METHODS This is a cross-sectional and population-based study that measured the quality of centers by the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool-Brazil), applied to adult users (n = 409) from 11 health centers in Florianópolis, state of Santa Catarina. Multilevel analysis was used to verify the relationship between the score of general quality of the primary health care and the scheduling model. The independent variables (age, skin color, scheduling model, panel size by primary health team, poverty ratio as income proxy, number of health teams, presence of economically interest areas, number of medical appointments in one year per primary health team, number of people treated in one year per health team), with p < 0.20 were selected for the multilevel model, which was adjusted with aggregates of information from users and health centers. RESULTS The health center that used advanced access had a general score of 7.04, while those using a weekly carve-out had a score of 6.26; the carve-out every 15 days, score of 5.87; and the traditional carve-out, score of 6.29. CONCLUSIONS The scheduling model of advanced access had a positive effect on the quality of primary health care, in the perception of users.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vidal,Tiago Barra, Rocha,Suelen Alves, Harzheim,Erno, Hauser,Lisiane, Tesser,Charles Dalcanale
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102019000100233
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-89102019000100233
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-891020190001002332019-05-02Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional studyVidal,Tiago BarraRocha,Suelen AlvesHarzheim,ErnoHauser,LisianeTesser,Charles Dalcanale Appointments and Schedules Primary Health Care, organization &amp; administration Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation Multilevel Analysis ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the scheduling model influences the perception of the user about the quality of primary health care centers. METHODS This is a cross-sectional and population-based study that measured the quality of centers by the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool-Brazil), applied to adult users (n = 409) from 11 health centers in Florianópolis, state of Santa Catarina. Multilevel analysis was used to verify the relationship between the score of general quality of the primary health care and the scheduling model. The independent variables (age, skin color, scheduling model, panel size by primary health team, poverty ratio as income proxy, number of health teams, presence of economically interest areas, number of medical appointments in one year per primary health team, number of people treated in one year per health team), with p < 0.20 were selected for the multilevel model, which was adjusted with aggregates of information from users and health centers. RESULTS The health center that used advanced access had a general score of 7.04, while those using a weekly carve-out had a score of 6.26; the carve-out every 15 days, score of 5.87; and the traditional carve-out, score of 6.29. CONCLUSIONS The scheduling model of advanced access had a positive effect on the quality of primary health care, in the perception of users.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São PauloRevista de Saúde Pública v.53 20192019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102019000100233en10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053000940
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Vidal,Tiago Barra
Rocha,Suelen Alves
Harzheim,Erno
Hauser,Lisiane
Tesser,Charles Dalcanale
spellingShingle Vidal,Tiago Barra
Rocha,Suelen Alves
Harzheim,Erno
Hauser,Lisiane
Tesser,Charles Dalcanale
Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study
author_facet Vidal,Tiago Barra
Rocha,Suelen Alves
Harzheim,Erno
Hauser,Lisiane
Tesser,Charles Dalcanale
author_sort Vidal,Tiago Barra
title Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study
title_short Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study
title_full Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study
title_sort scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the scheduling model influences the perception of the user about the quality of primary health care centers. METHODS This is a cross-sectional and population-based study that measured the quality of centers by the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool-Brazil), applied to adult users (n = 409) from 11 health centers in Florianópolis, state of Santa Catarina. Multilevel analysis was used to verify the relationship between the score of general quality of the primary health care and the scheduling model. The independent variables (age, skin color, scheduling model, panel size by primary health team, poverty ratio as income proxy, number of health teams, presence of economically interest areas, number of medical appointments in one year per primary health team, number of people treated in one year per health team), with p < 0.20 were selected for the multilevel model, which was adjusted with aggregates of information from users and health centers. RESULTS The health center that used advanced access had a general score of 7.04, while those using a weekly carve-out had a score of 6.26; the carve-out every 15 days, score of 5.87; and the traditional carve-out, score of 6.29. CONCLUSIONS The scheduling model of advanced access had a positive effect on the quality of primary health care, in the perception of users.
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102019000100233
work_keys_str_mv AT vidaltiagobarra schedulingmodelsandprimaryhealthcarequalityamultilevelandcrosssectionalstudy
AT rochasuelenalves schedulingmodelsandprimaryhealthcarequalityamultilevelandcrosssectionalstudy
AT harzheimerno schedulingmodelsandprimaryhealthcarequalityamultilevelandcrosssectionalstudy
AT hauserlisiane schedulingmodelsandprimaryhealthcarequalityamultilevelandcrosssectionalstudy
AT tessercharlesdalcanale schedulingmodelsandprimaryhealthcarequalityamultilevelandcrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1756379448601477120