Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of mobile ophthalmic unit screenings and to investigate barriers between community care and resolution of the problem at a tertiary center. METHODS This prospective study evaluated a convenience sample from 10 municipalities in São Paulo State, Brazil. Patients were assessed in the municipality by a mobile ophthalmic unit and underwent a complete ophthalmic consultation. Patients were referred as warranted to a tertiary hospital. RESULTS The mobile ophthalmic unit screened 1,928 individuals and 714 (37%) were referred. The mean age of the referred patients was 57.12 (SD = 19.5) years with best corrected visual acuity of 0.37 (SD = 0.36) logMAR. Forty-seven (6.6%) patients were blind and 185 (26.5%) were visually impaired. Cataracts (44.7%) and pterygium (14.7%) accounted for most referrals. Of those referred, 67.1% presented to the tertiary center. The diagnosis by the mobile ophthalmic unit corresponded to the one by the tertiary center in 88.5% of the cases. There were a significantly higher number of blind and visually impaired persons among those who presented to the hospital. There was a significantly greater attendance among patients living in more distant municipalities from the reference center with a higher number of inhabitants and a greater number of ophthalmologists in the cities of origin (p < 0.05, all comparisons). Complete treatment was performed in 65.6% of patients, and loss to follow-up was the main cause of incomplete treatment in 50.7% of patients. A total of 313 cataract surgeries were performed, which reduced the number of blind patients from 20 to 2 and of visually impaired individuals from 87 to 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Only 37% of the patients assessed by a mobile ophthalmic unit required referral to a tertiary hospital. Among the referred patients, 67.1% presented to the hospital, and complete resolution after treatment was approximately 65.5%. There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and a reduction in the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment postoperatively.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferreira,Gabriel de Almeida, Rezende,Marcelo Abrão, Meneghim,Roberta Lilian Fernandes de Sousa, Schellini,Silvana Artioli
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100283
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-89102018000100283
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-891020180001002832018-11-26Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary centerFerreira,Gabriel de AlmeidaRezende,Marcelo AbrãoMeneghim,Roberta Lilian Fernandes de SousaSchellini,Silvana Artioli Blindness, rehabilitation Eye Health Services Triage Health Services Accessibility Tertiary Healthcare Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of mobile ophthalmic unit screenings and to investigate barriers between community care and resolution of the problem at a tertiary center. METHODS This prospective study evaluated a convenience sample from 10 municipalities in São Paulo State, Brazil. Patients were assessed in the municipality by a mobile ophthalmic unit and underwent a complete ophthalmic consultation. Patients were referred as warranted to a tertiary hospital. RESULTS The mobile ophthalmic unit screened 1,928 individuals and 714 (37%) were referred. The mean age of the referred patients was 57.12 (SD = 19.5) years with best corrected visual acuity of 0.37 (SD = 0.36) logMAR. Forty-seven (6.6%) patients were blind and 185 (26.5%) were visually impaired. Cataracts (44.7%) and pterygium (14.7%) accounted for most referrals. Of those referred, 67.1% presented to the tertiary center. The diagnosis by the mobile ophthalmic unit corresponded to the one by the tertiary center in 88.5% of the cases. There were a significantly higher number of blind and visually impaired persons among those who presented to the hospital. There was a significantly greater attendance among patients living in more distant municipalities from the reference center with a higher number of inhabitants and a greater number of ophthalmologists in the cities of origin (p < 0.05, all comparisons). Complete treatment was performed in 65.6% of patients, and loss to follow-up was the main cause of incomplete treatment in 50.7% of patients. A total of 313 cataract surgeries were performed, which reduced the number of blind patients from 20 to 2 and of visually impaired individuals from 87 to 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Only 37% of the patients assessed by a mobile ophthalmic unit required referral to a tertiary hospital. Among the referred patients, 67.1% presented to the hospital, and complete resolution after treatment was approximately 65.5%. There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and a reduction in the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment postoperatively.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São PauloRevista de Saúde Pública v.52 20182018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100283en10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000589
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ferreira,Gabriel de Almeida
Rezende,Marcelo Abrão
Meneghim,Roberta Lilian Fernandes de Sousa
Schellini,Silvana Artioli
spellingShingle Ferreira,Gabriel de Almeida
Rezende,Marcelo Abrão
Meneghim,Roberta Lilian Fernandes de Sousa
Schellini,Silvana Artioli
Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center
author_facet Ferreira,Gabriel de Almeida
Rezende,Marcelo Abrão
Meneghim,Roberta Lilian Fernandes de Sousa
Schellini,Silvana Artioli
author_sort Ferreira,Gabriel de Almeida
title Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center
title_short Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center
title_full Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center
title_fullStr Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center
title_full_unstemmed Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center
title_sort barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of mobile ophthalmic unit screenings and to investigate barriers between community care and resolution of the problem at a tertiary center. METHODS This prospective study evaluated a convenience sample from 10 municipalities in São Paulo State, Brazil. Patients were assessed in the municipality by a mobile ophthalmic unit and underwent a complete ophthalmic consultation. Patients were referred as warranted to a tertiary hospital. RESULTS The mobile ophthalmic unit screened 1,928 individuals and 714 (37%) were referred. The mean age of the referred patients was 57.12 (SD = 19.5) years with best corrected visual acuity of 0.37 (SD = 0.36) logMAR. Forty-seven (6.6%) patients were blind and 185 (26.5%) were visually impaired. Cataracts (44.7%) and pterygium (14.7%) accounted for most referrals. Of those referred, 67.1% presented to the tertiary center. The diagnosis by the mobile ophthalmic unit corresponded to the one by the tertiary center in 88.5% of the cases. There were a significantly higher number of blind and visually impaired persons among those who presented to the hospital. There was a significantly greater attendance among patients living in more distant municipalities from the reference center with a higher number of inhabitants and a greater number of ophthalmologists in the cities of origin (p < 0.05, all comparisons). Complete treatment was performed in 65.6% of patients, and loss to follow-up was the main cause of incomplete treatment in 50.7% of patients. A total of 313 cataract surgeries were performed, which reduced the number of blind patients from 20 to 2 and of visually impaired individuals from 87 to 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Only 37% of the patients assessed by a mobile ophthalmic unit required referral to a tertiary hospital. Among the referred patients, 67.1% presented to the hospital, and complete resolution after treatment was approximately 65.5%. There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and a reduction in the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment postoperatively.
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100283
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreiragabrieldealmeida barriersbetweencommunityscreeningforvisualproblemsandtreatmentsinatertiarycenter
AT rezendemarceloabrao barriersbetweencommunityscreeningforvisualproblemsandtreatmentsinatertiarycenter
AT meneghimrobertalilianfernandesdesousa barriersbetweencommunityscreeningforvisualproblemsandtreatmentsinatertiarycenter
AT schellinisilvanaartioli barriersbetweencommunityscreeningforvisualproblemsandtreatmentsinatertiarycenter
_version_ 1756379438324383744