Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate, with a focus on participation, an evaluation process developed by municipal managers and administrators of a health region in the state of São Paulo, considering the need for theoretical reflection on participatory health practices in the Brazilian context. METHODS Qualitative research that used the framework developed by Daigneault and Jacob (2009) to analyze the empirical material, encompassing three dimensions of participation: control of the evaluation process, diversity of participants, and extent of their involvement. We highlighted decisions or contextual aspects that deepened or limited the participatory option in the process under study. RESULTS We identified the presence and important performance of stakeholders who are “not specialists in evaluation”, through participation both in the direction of the evaluation process and in its distinct stages. The formed group started from their own annoyances added to the need for information and reflection to define the subject and scope of the evaluation; the use of the process planned by them guided the definition of the data to be collected and the format of result dissemination; the empirical material analysis was undertaken jointly by the participants. Regarding the third dimension, a limitation was identified regarding the diversity of actors involved due to the prioritization of the possibility of in-depth work with a fixed group of managers. CONCLUSIONS It is stated that there is no “ideal participation model” for evaluations. In certain contexts and structures, real opportunities for participation – even if they seem fragile at first sight – should be leveraged, and that requires flexibility and critical reflection on the part of those responsible for the evaluation processes to undertake the necessary adjustments.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Almeida,Cristiane Andrea Locatelli de, Tanaka,Oswaldo Yoshimi
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000100293
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-89102017000100293
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-891020170001002932017-11-14Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal managementAlmeida,Cristiane Andrea Locatelli deTanaka,Oswaldo Yoshimi Health Evaluation, methods Process Assessment (Health Care Participative Planning Health Manager Decision Making Health Services Administration Qualitative Research ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate, with a focus on participation, an evaluation process developed by municipal managers and administrators of a health region in the state of São Paulo, considering the need for theoretical reflection on participatory health practices in the Brazilian context. METHODS Qualitative research that used the framework developed by Daigneault and Jacob (2009) to analyze the empirical material, encompassing three dimensions of participation: control of the evaluation process, diversity of participants, and extent of their involvement. We highlighted decisions or contextual aspects that deepened or limited the participatory option in the process under study. RESULTS We identified the presence and important performance of stakeholders who are “not specialists in evaluation”, through participation both in the direction of the evaluation process and in its distinct stages. The formed group started from their own annoyances added to the need for information and reflection to define the subject and scope of the evaluation; the use of the process planned by them guided the definition of the data to be collected and the format of result dissemination; the empirical material analysis was undertaken jointly by the participants. Regarding the third dimension, a limitation was identified regarding the diversity of actors involved due to the prioritization of the possibility of in-depth work with a fixed group of managers. CONCLUSIONS It is stated that there is no “ideal participation model” for evaluations. In certain contexts and structures, real opportunities for participation – even if they seem fragile at first sight – should be leveraged, and that requires flexibility and critical reflection on the part of those responsible for the evaluation processes to undertake the necessary adjustments.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São PauloRevista de Saúde Pública v.51 20172017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000100293en10.11606/s1518-8787.2017051007047
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Almeida,Cristiane Andrea Locatelli de
Tanaka,Oswaldo Yoshimi
spellingShingle Almeida,Cristiane Andrea Locatelli de
Tanaka,Oswaldo Yoshimi
Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management
author_facet Almeida,Cristiane Andrea Locatelli de
Tanaka,Oswaldo Yoshimi
author_sort Almeida,Cristiane Andrea Locatelli de
title Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management
title_short Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management
title_full Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management
title_fullStr Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management
title_full_unstemmed Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management
title_sort meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate, with a focus on participation, an evaluation process developed by municipal managers and administrators of a health region in the state of São Paulo, considering the need for theoretical reflection on participatory health practices in the Brazilian context. METHODS Qualitative research that used the framework developed by Daigneault and Jacob (2009) to analyze the empirical material, encompassing three dimensions of participation: control of the evaluation process, diversity of participants, and extent of their involvement. We highlighted decisions or contextual aspects that deepened or limited the participatory option in the process under study. RESULTS We identified the presence and important performance of stakeholders who are “not specialists in evaluation”, through participation both in the direction of the evaluation process and in its distinct stages. The formed group started from their own annoyances added to the need for information and reflection to define the subject and scope of the evaluation; the use of the process planned by them guided the definition of the data to be collected and the format of result dissemination; the empirical material analysis was undertaken jointly by the participants. Regarding the third dimension, a limitation was identified regarding the diversity of actors involved due to the prioritization of the possibility of in-depth work with a fixed group of managers. CONCLUSIONS It is stated that there is no “ideal participation model” for evaluations. In certain contexts and structures, real opportunities for participation – even if they seem fragile at first sight – should be leveraged, and that requires flexibility and critical reflection on the part of those responsible for the evaluation processes to undertake the necessary adjustments.
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000100293
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidacristianeandrealocatellide metaevaluationofaparticipatoryprocessinthestrengtheningofmunicipalmanagement
AT tanakaoswaldoyoshimi metaevaluationofaparticipatoryprocessinthestrengtheningofmunicipalmanagement
_version_ 1756379417022562304