Influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosis

Abstract Objective: To determine the influence of visual field results in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Methods: A questionnaire with ophthalmologists was conducted where slides of a digital photograph of the optic disc and computerized visual field exam were presented.(Physicians were instructed to answer whether glaucoma was observed in each of the slides). No other information was given to those examiners. Half of the patients had glaucoma with corresponding visual field, and the other half had physiological cupping and normal visual field. The slides were equally divided between retinography and corresponding visual field (same patient) and exams randomly exchanged, where an optic disc of glaucoma with a normal visual field was placed, and vice-versa. The order in which the slides were presented was also randomized. Results: Forty slides were evaluated by 29 ophthalmologists. No glaucoma specialist was included. The overall agreement among the examiners (Kappa) was 0.270 ± 0.281, and 0.261 ± 0.238 for the exams of the same eye and was 0.274 ± 0.217 from the slides with the exams changed (p=0.4). The diagnosis was made correctly in glaucoma patients with corresponding visual field exam in 66.89% of the cases, and in 66.20% of patients with physiological cupping. When the exams were exchanged, the results dropped to 34.13% and 35.86%, respectively (p<0.001 for both). Conclusion: Visual field results may influence the diagnosis of glaucoma by non-glaucoma specialists.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Magacho,Leopoldo, Franco,Cláudia Gomide Vilela de Sousa, Figueiredo,Gustavo de Paula, Vale,Arnaldo Machado Borges do, Rassi,Bruna Thomé, Ávila,Marcos P.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802017000600285
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-72802017000600285
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-728020170006002852018-02-20Influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosisMagacho,LeopoldoFranco,Cláudia Gomide Vilela de SousaFigueiredo,Gustavo de PaulaVale,Arnaldo Machado Borges doRassi,Bruna ThoméÁvila,Marcos P. Glaucoma/diagnosis Visual field tests Optic disk Observer variation False negative reactions Abstract Objective: To determine the influence of visual field results in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Methods: A questionnaire with ophthalmologists was conducted where slides of a digital photograph of the optic disc and computerized visual field exam were presented.(Physicians were instructed to answer whether glaucoma was observed in each of the slides). No other information was given to those examiners. Half of the patients had glaucoma with corresponding visual field, and the other half had physiological cupping and normal visual field. The slides were equally divided between retinography and corresponding visual field (same patient) and exams randomly exchanged, where an optic disc of glaucoma with a normal visual field was placed, and vice-versa. The order in which the slides were presented was also randomized. Results: Forty slides were evaluated by 29 ophthalmologists. No glaucoma specialist was included. The overall agreement among the examiners (Kappa) was 0.270 ± 0.281, and 0.261 ± 0.238 for the exams of the same eye and was 0.274 ± 0.217 from the slides with the exams changed (p=0.4). The diagnosis was made correctly in glaucoma patients with corresponding visual field exam in 66.89% of the cases, and in 66.20% of patients with physiological cupping. When the exams were exchanged, the results dropped to 34.13% and 35.86%, respectively (p<0.001 for both). Conclusion: Visual field results may influence the diagnosis of glaucoma by non-glaucoma specialists.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de OftalmologiaRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.76 n.6 20172017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802017000600285en10.5935/0034-7280.20170059
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Magacho,Leopoldo
Franco,Cláudia Gomide Vilela de Sousa
Figueiredo,Gustavo de Paula
Vale,Arnaldo Machado Borges do
Rassi,Bruna Thomé
Ávila,Marcos P.
spellingShingle Magacho,Leopoldo
Franco,Cláudia Gomide Vilela de Sousa
Figueiredo,Gustavo de Paula
Vale,Arnaldo Machado Borges do
Rassi,Bruna Thomé
Ávila,Marcos P.
Influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosis
author_facet Magacho,Leopoldo
Franco,Cláudia Gomide Vilela de Sousa
Figueiredo,Gustavo de Paula
Vale,Arnaldo Machado Borges do
Rassi,Bruna Thomé
Ávila,Marcos P.
author_sort Magacho,Leopoldo
title Influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosis
title_short Influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosis
title_full Influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosis
title_fullStr Influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosis
title_sort influence of visual field results in the glaucoma diagnosis
description Abstract Objective: To determine the influence of visual field results in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Methods: A questionnaire with ophthalmologists was conducted where slides of a digital photograph of the optic disc and computerized visual field exam were presented.(Physicians were instructed to answer whether glaucoma was observed in each of the slides). No other information was given to those examiners. Half of the patients had glaucoma with corresponding visual field, and the other half had physiological cupping and normal visual field. The slides were equally divided between retinography and corresponding visual field (same patient) and exams randomly exchanged, where an optic disc of glaucoma with a normal visual field was placed, and vice-versa. The order in which the slides were presented was also randomized. Results: Forty slides were evaluated by 29 ophthalmologists. No glaucoma specialist was included. The overall agreement among the examiners (Kappa) was 0.270 ± 0.281, and 0.261 ± 0.238 for the exams of the same eye and was 0.274 ± 0.217 from the slides with the exams changed (p=0.4). The diagnosis was made correctly in glaucoma patients with corresponding visual field exam in 66.89% of the cases, and in 66.20% of patients with physiological cupping. When the exams were exchanged, the results dropped to 34.13% and 35.86%, respectively (p<0.001 for both). Conclusion: Visual field results may influence the diagnosis of glaucoma by non-glaucoma specialists.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802017000600285
work_keys_str_mv AT magacholeopoldo influenceofvisualfieldresultsintheglaucomadiagnosis
AT francoclaudiagomidevileladesousa influenceofvisualfieldresultsintheglaucomadiagnosis
AT figueiredogustavodepaula influenceofvisualfieldresultsintheglaucomadiagnosis
AT valearnaldomachadoborgesdo influenceofvisualfieldresultsintheglaucomadiagnosis
AT rassibrunathome influenceofvisualfieldresultsintheglaucomadiagnosis
AT avilamarcosp influenceofvisualfieldresultsintheglaucomadiagnosis
_version_ 1756377487680471040