The anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational study

Abstract Background and objectives: Advances in medicine, including anesthesiology and resuscitation, have made natural death increasingly rare. As a consequence, dysthanasia has become usual in a scenario for which there is not rationale. The present study aimed to assess the level of knowledge of Brazilian anesthesiologists on the principles of dysthanasia and orthothanasia. Thence, we studied the management preferences of these professionals, vis-à-vis those practices, as well as how medical school contributed to addressing death-related issues. Method: Quantitative approach, prospective and descriptive cohort that included 150 anesthesiologists, members of the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology, and who were invited to participate by email. An online questionnaire containing 38 questions was prepared by the authors. The study was approved by the Instructional Research Ethics Committee. Results: Anesthesiologists, although claiming to know dysthanasia and orthothanasia, mostly acquired knowledge outside medical school. If faced with their own end of care, or of a patient or a loved one, they prefer orthothanasia, to die at home, prioritizing dignity. However, the specialists claimed to have already practiced dysthanasia, even when orthothanasia was the choice management, which caused them negative feelings. Almost all respondents stated that they did not have practical training in undergraduate school on how to face end-of-life issues, although they felt capable of identifying it. Most were not aware of the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine Resolution 1.805/06 that makes practicing orthothanasia feasible. Anesthesiologists’ religion or the political-administrative region of residence had no effect on their preferences. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists claim to have knowledge on dysthanasia and orthothanasia, but prefer, in the face of a terminally ill patient, to practice orthothanasia, although dysthanasia is usual, and results in frustration and indignation. The medical school curriculum is unsatisfactory in addressing death-related issues.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cavalcante,Rodney Segura, Barros,Guilherme Antonio Moreira de, Ganem,Eliana Marisa
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000300225
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-70942020000300225
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-709420200003002252020-09-09The anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational studyCavalcante,Rodney SeguraBarros,Guilherme Antonio Moreira deGanem,Eliana Marisa Dysthanasia Anesthesiology Bioethics Legality (Law) Abstract Background and objectives: Advances in medicine, including anesthesiology and resuscitation, have made natural death increasingly rare. As a consequence, dysthanasia has become usual in a scenario for which there is not rationale. The present study aimed to assess the level of knowledge of Brazilian anesthesiologists on the principles of dysthanasia and orthothanasia. Thence, we studied the management preferences of these professionals, vis-à-vis those practices, as well as how medical school contributed to addressing death-related issues. Method: Quantitative approach, prospective and descriptive cohort that included 150 anesthesiologists, members of the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology, and who were invited to participate by email. An online questionnaire containing 38 questions was prepared by the authors. The study was approved by the Instructional Research Ethics Committee. Results: Anesthesiologists, although claiming to know dysthanasia and orthothanasia, mostly acquired knowledge outside medical school. If faced with their own end of care, or of a patient or a loved one, they prefer orthothanasia, to die at home, prioritizing dignity. However, the specialists claimed to have already practiced dysthanasia, even when orthothanasia was the choice management, which caused them negative feelings. Almost all respondents stated that they did not have practical training in undergraduate school on how to face end-of-life issues, although they felt capable of identifying it. Most were not aware of the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine Resolution 1.805/06 that makes practicing orthothanasia feasible. Anesthesiologists’ religion or the political-administrative region of residence had no effect on their preferences. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists claim to have knowledge on dysthanasia and orthothanasia, but prefer, in the face of a terminally ill patient, to practice orthothanasia, although dysthanasia is usual, and results in frustration and indignation. The medical school curriculum is unsatisfactory in addressing death-related issues.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de AnestesiologiaRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.70 n.3 20202020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000300225en10.1016/j.bjane.2020.05.002
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Cavalcante,Rodney Segura
Barros,Guilherme Antonio Moreira de
Ganem,Eliana Marisa
spellingShingle Cavalcante,Rodney Segura
Barros,Guilherme Antonio Moreira de
Ganem,Eliana Marisa
The anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational study
author_facet Cavalcante,Rodney Segura
Barros,Guilherme Antonio Moreira de
Ganem,Eliana Marisa
author_sort Cavalcante,Rodney Segura
title The anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational study
title_short The anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational study
title_full The anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational study
title_fullStr The anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational study
title_full_unstemmed The anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational study
title_sort anesthesiologist facing terminality: a survey-based observational study
description Abstract Background and objectives: Advances in medicine, including anesthesiology and resuscitation, have made natural death increasingly rare. As a consequence, dysthanasia has become usual in a scenario for which there is not rationale. The present study aimed to assess the level of knowledge of Brazilian anesthesiologists on the principles of dysthanasia and orthothanasia. Thence, we studied the management preferences of these professionals, vis-à-vis those practices, as well as how medical school contributed to addressing death-related issues. Method: Quantitative approach, prospective and descriptive cohort that included 150 anesthesiologists, members of the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology, and who were invited to participate by email. An online questionnaire containing 38 questions was prepared by the authors. The study was approved by the Instructional Research Ethics Committee. Results: Anesthesiologists, although claiming to know dysthanasia and orthothanasia, mostly acquired knowledge outside medical school. If faced with their own end of care, or of a patient or a loved one, they prefer orthothanasia, to die at home, prioritizing dignity. However, the specialists claimed to have already practiced dysthanasia, even when orthothanasia was the choice management, which caused them negative feelings. Almost all respondents stated that they did not have practical training in undergraduate school on how to face end-of-life issues, although they felt capable of identifying it. Most were not aware of the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine Resolution 1.805/06 that makes practicing orthothanasia feasible. Anesthesiologists’ religion or the political-administrative region of residence had no effect on their preferences. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists claim to have knowledge on dysthanasia and orthothanasia, but prefer, in the face of a terminally ill patient, to practice orthothanasia, although dysthanasia is usual, and results in frustration and indignation. The medical school curriculum is unsatisfactory in addressing death-related issues.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000300225
work_keys_str_mv AT cavalcanterodneysegura theanesthesiologistfacingterminalityasurveybasedobservationalstudy
AT barrosguilhermeantoniomoreirade theanesthesiologistfacingterminalityasurveybasedobservationalstudy
AT ganemelianamarisa theanesthesiologistfacingterminalityasurveybasedobservationalstudy
AT cavalcanterodneysegura anesthesiologistfacingterminalityasurveybasedobservationalstudy
AT barrosguilhermeantoniomoreirade anesthesiologistfacingterminalityasurveybasedobservationalstudy
AT ganemelianamarisa anesthesiologistfacingterminalityasurveybasedobservationalstudy
_version_ 1756376393888825344