Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational study

Abstract Background and objectives: Poor monitoring of tracheal tube cuff pressure may result in patient complications. The objective method of using a manometer is recommended to keep safe cuff pressure values (20‒30 cm H2O). However, as manometers are not readily available, anesthesiologists use subjective methods. We aimed to assess appropriateness of a subjective method for attaining cuff pressure and the expertise level of manometer handling among anesthesiology staff and residents in a university teaching hospital. Methods: Prospective observational study, recruiting participants that performed tracheal intubation and the subjective method for tube cuff inflation. Patients with difficult airway, larynx and trachea anatomic abnormality and emergency procedures were not included. Up to 60 minutes after tracheal intubation, an investigator registered the cuff pressure using an aneroid manometer (AMBU®) connected to the tube pilot balloon. Results: Forty-seven anesthesiologists were included in the study - 24 residents and 23 staff. Mean (SD) and medians (IQR) measured in cmH2O were, respectively, 52.5 (27.1) and 50 (30‒70). We registered 83% of measurements outside the recommended pressure range, with no difference between specialists and residents. The level of expertise with the objective method was also similar in both groups. Pressure adjustments were performed in 76.6% of cases. Conclusion: The subjective method for inflating the tracheal tube cuff resulted in a high rate of inadequate cuff pressures, with no difference in performance between anesthesiology specialists and residents.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duarte,Nádia Maria da Conceição, Caetano,Ana Maria Menezes, Arouca,Gustavo de Oliveira, Ferrreira,Andrea Tavares, Figueiredo,José Luiz de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000100009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-70942020000100009
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-709420200001000092020-06-29Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational studyDuarte,Nádia Maria da ConceiçãoCaetano,Ana Maria MenezesArouca,Gustavo de OliveiraFerrreira,Andrea TavaresFigueiredo,José Luiz de Tracheal intubation Tracheal tube Cuff pressure Manometer Anesthesiologist Abstract Background and objectives: Poor monitoring of tracheal tube cuff pressure may result in patient complications. The objective method of using a manometer is recommended to keep safe cuff pressure values (20‒30 cm H2O). However, as manometers are not readily available, anesthesiologists use subjective methods. We aimed to assess appropriateness of a subjective method for attaining cuff pressure and the expertise level of manometer handling among anesthesiology staff and residents in a university teaching hospital. Methods: Prospective observational study, recruiting participants that performed tracheal intubation and the subjective method for tube cuff inflation. Patients with difficult airway, larynx and trachea anatomic abnormality and emergency procedures were not included. Up to 60 minutes after tracheal intubation, an investigator registered the cuff pressure using an aneroid manometer (AMBU®) connected to the tube pilot balloon. Results: Forty-seven anesthesiologists were included in the study - 24 residents and 23 staff. Mean (SD) and medians (IQR) measured in cmH2O were, respectively, 52.5 (27.1) and 50 (30‒70). We registered 83% of measurements outside the recommended pressure range, with no difference between specialists and residents. The level of expertise with the objective method was also similar in both groups. Pressure adjustments were performed in 76.6% of cases. Conclusion: The subjective method for inflating the tracheal tube cuff resulted in a high rate of inadequate cuff pressures, with no difference in performance between anesthesiology specialists and residents.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de AnestesiologiaRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.70 n.1 20202020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000100009en10.1016/j.bjane.2020.02.001
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Duarte,Nádia Maria da Conceição
Caetano,Ana Maria Menezes
Arouca,Gustavo de Oliveira
Ferrreira,Andrea Tavares
Figueiredo,José Luiz de
spellingShingle Duarte,Nádia Maria da Conceição
Caetano,Ana Maria Menezes
Arouca,Gustavo de Oliveira
Ferrreira,Andrea Tavares
Figueiredo,José Luiz de
Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational study
author_facet Duarte,Nádia Maria da Conceição
Caetano,Ana Maria Menezes
Arouca,Gustavo de Oliveira
Ferrreira,Andrea Tavares
Figueiredo,José Luiz de
author_sort Duarte,Nádia Maria da Conceição
title Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational study
title_short Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational study
title_full Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational study
title_fullStr Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational study
title_sort subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. prospective observational study
description Abstract Background and objectives: Poor monitoring of tracheal tube cuff pressure may result in patient complications. The objective method of using a manometer is recommended to keep safe cuff pressure values (20‒30 cm H2O). However, as manometers are not readily available, anesthesiologists use subjective methods. We aimed to assess appropriateness of a subjective method for attaining cuff pressure and the expertise level of manometer handling among anesthesiology staff and residents in a university teaching hospital. Methods: Prospective observational study, recruiting participants that performed tracheal intubation and the subjective method for tube cuff inflation. Patients with difficult airway, larynx and trachea anatomic abnormality and emergency procedures were not included. Up to 60 minutes after tracheal intubation, an investigator registered the cuff pressure using an aneroid manometer (AMBU®) connected to the tube pilot balloon. Results: Forty-seven anesthesiologists were included in the study - 24 residents and 23 staff. Mean (SD) and medians (IQR) measured in cmH2O were, respectively, 52.5 (27.1) and 50 (30‒70). We registered 83% of measurements outside the recommended pressure range, with no difference between specialists and residents. The level of expertise with the objective method was also similar in both groups. Pressure adjustments were performed in 76.6% of cases. Conclusion: The subjective method for inflating the tracheal tube cuff resulted in a high rate of inadequate cuff pressures, with no difference in performance between anesthesiology specialists and residents.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000100009
work_keys_str_mv AT duartenadiamariadaconceicao subjectivemethodfortrachealtubecuffinflationperformanceofanesthesiologyresidentsandstaffanesthesiologistsprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT caetanoanamariamenezes subjectivemethodfortrachealtubecuffinflationperformanceofanesthesiologyresidentsandstaffanesthesiologistsprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT aroucagustavodeoliveira subjectivemethodfortrachealtubecuffinflationperformanceofanesthesiologyresidentsandstaffanesthesiologistsprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ferrreiraandreatavares subjectivemethodfortrachealtubecuffinflationperformanceofanesthesiologyresidentsandstaffanesthesiologistsprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT figueiredojoseluizde subjectivemethodfortrachealtubecuffinflationperformanceofanesthesiologyresidentsandstaffanesthesiologistsprospectiveobservationalstudy
_version_ 1756376387968565248