Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background: The goal directed hemodynamic therapy is an approach focused on the use of cardiac output and related parameters as end-points for fluids and drugs to optimize tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. Primary aim: To determine the effects of intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications rates. Methods: A meta-analysis was carried out of the effects of goal directed hemodynamic therapy in adult noncardiac surgery on postoperative complications and mortality using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. A systematic search was performed in Medline PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (last update, October 2014). Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials in which intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy was compared to conventional fluid management in noncardiac surgery. Exclusion criteria were trauma and pediatric surgery studies and that using pulmonary artery catheter. End-points were postoperative complications (primary) and mortality (secondary). Those studies that fulfilled the entry criteria were examined in full and subjected to quantifiable analysis, predefined subgroup analysis (stratified by type of monitor, therapy, and hemodynamic goal), and predefined sensitivity analysis. Results: 51 RCTs were initially identified, 24 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. 5 randomized clinical trials were added by manual search, resulting in 29 randomized clinical trials in the final analysis, including 2654 patients. A significant reduction in complications for goal directed hemodynamic therapy was observed (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, p < 0.001). No significant decrease in mortality was achieved (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45-1.28, p = 0.30). Quality sensitive analyses confirmed the main overall results. Conclusions: Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy with minimally invasive monitoring decreases postoperative complications in noncardiac surgery, although it was not able to show a significant decrease in mortality rate.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ripollés,Javier, Espinosa,Angel, Martínez-Hurtado,Eugenio, Abad-Gurumeta,Alfredo, Casans-Francés,Rubén, Fernández-Pérez,Cristina, López-Timoneda,Francisco, Calvo-Vecino,José María
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000500513
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-70942016000500513
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-709420160005005132016-09-27Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysisRipollés,JavierEspinosa,AngelMartínez-Hurtado,EugenioAbad-Gurumeta,AlfredoCasans-Francés,RubénFernández-Pérez,CristinaLópez-Timoneda,FranciscoCalvo-Vecino,José María Goal directed fluid therapy Meta-analysis Hemodynamic goal Noncardiac surgery Abstract Background: The goal directed hemodynamic therapy is an approach focused on the use of cardiac output and related parameters as end-points for fluids and drugs to optimize tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. Primary aim: To determine the effects of intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications rates. Methods: A meta-analysis was carried out of the effects of goal directed hemodynamic therapy in adult noncardiac surgery on postoperative complications and mortality using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. A systematic search was performed in Medline PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (last update, October 2014). Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials in which intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy was compared to conventional fluid management in noncardiac surgery. Exclusion criteria were trauma and pediatric surgery studies and that using pulmonary artery catheter. End-points were postoperative complications (primary) and mortality (secondary). Those studies that fulfilled the entry criteria were examined in full and subjected to quantifiable analysis, predefined subgroup analysis (stratified by type of monitor, therapy, and hemodynamic goal), and predefined sensitivity analysis. Results: 51 RCTs were initially identified, 24 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. 5 randomized clinical trials were added by manual search, resulting in 29 randomized clinical trials in the final analysis, including 2654 patients. A significant reduction in complications for goal directed hemodynamic therapy was observed (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, p < 0.001). No significant decrease in mortality was achieved (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45-1.28, p = 0.30). Quality sensitive analyses confirmed the main overall results. Conclusions: Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy with minimally invasive monitoring decreases postoperative complications in noncardiac surgery, although it was not able to show a significant decrease in mortality rate.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de AnestesiologiaRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.66 n.5 20162016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000500513en10.1016/j.bjane.2015.02.001
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ripollés,Javier
Espinosa,Angel
Martínez-Hurtado,Eugenio
Abad-Gurumeta,Alfredo
Casans-Francés,Rubén
Fernández-Pérez,Cristina
López-Timoneda,Francisco
Calvo-Vecino,José María
spellingShingle Ripollés,Javier
Espinosa,Angel
Martínez-Hurtado,Eugenio
Abad-Gurumeta,Alfredo
Casans-Francés,Rubén
Fernández-Pérez,Cristina
López-Timoneda,Francisco
Calvo-Vecino,José María
Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author_facet Ripollés,Javier
Espinosa,Angel
Martínez-Hurtado,Eugenio
Abad-Gurumeta,Alfredo
Casans-Francés,Rubén
Fernández-Pérez,Cristina
López-Timoneda,Francisco
Calvo-Vecino,José María
author_sort Ripollés,Javier
title Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
description Abstract Background: The goal directed hemodynamic therapy is an approach focused on the use of cardiac output and related parameters as end-points for fluids and drugs to optimize tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. Primary aim: To determine the effects of intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications rates. Methods: A meta-analysis was carried out of the effects of goal directed hemodynamic therapy in adult noncardiac surgery on postoperative complications and mortality using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. A systematic search was performed in Medline PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (last update, October 2014). Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials in which intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy was compared to conventional fluid management in noncardiac surgery. Exclusion criteria were trauma and pediatric surgery studies and that using pulmonary artery catheter. End-points were postoperative complications (primary) and mortality (secondary). Those studies that fulfilled the entry criteria were examined in full and subjected to quantifiable analysis, predefined subgroup analysis (stratified by type of monitor, therapy, and hemodynamic goal), and predefined sensitivity analysis. Results: 51 RCTs were initially identified, 24 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. 5 randomized clinical trials were added by manual search, resulting in 29 randomized clinical trials in the final analysis, including 2654 patients. A significant reduction in complications for goal directed hemodynamic therapy was observed (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, p < 0.001). No significant decrease in mortality was achieved (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45-1.28, p = 0.30). Quality sensitive analyses confirmed the main overall results. Conclusions: Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy with minimally invasive monitoring decreases postoperative complications in noncardiac surgery, although it was not able to show a significant decrease in mortality rate.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000500513
work_keys_str_mv AT ripollesjavier intraoperativegoaldirectedhemodynamictherapyinnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT espinosaangel intraoperativegoaldirectedhemodynamictherapyinnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinezhurtadoeugenio intraoperativegoaldirectedhemodynamictherapyinnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abadgurumetaalfredo intraoperativegoaldirectedhemodynamictherapyinnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT casansfrancesruben intraoperativegoaldirectedhemodynamictherapyinnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fernandezperezcristina intraoperativegoaldirectedhemodynamictherapyinnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lopeztimonedafrancisco intraoperativegoaldirectedhemodynamictherapyinnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT calvovecinojosemaria intraoperativegoaldirectedhemodynamictherapyinnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1756376335041691648