The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of two different glide path preparation methods on the fracture rate of the Primary 25/08 WaveOne reciprocating instrument. Preparation times for different glide path methods and total time for root canal preparation, with and without prior glide path preparation, were also calculated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ISO 15, 0.02 taper Endo-Training-Blocks (n = 300) were selected and randomly divided into three main groups (n = 100): Group 1: no glide path (control); Group 2: glide path preparation with stainless-steel hand files; and Group 3: glide path preparation with rotary PathFiles. The time taken to prepare each glide path was recorded. The specimens in each main group were then randomly assigned into five subgroups (n=20). New Primary 25/08 WaveOne files were used for canal preparation in each subgroup. The outcome was measured by recording how many simulated canals could be shaped with one WaveOne reciprocating file in each subgroup before instrument breakage occurred. The average time it took to prepare each of the simulated canals was calculated and recorded. The data were collected and statistically analysed using the ANOVA / Bonferroni test. RESULTS: Glide path preparation with PathFiles was significantly faster than with hand files (P<0.001). After the glide path preparation had been performed with PathFiles, a greater number of simulated canals could be prepared before failure of the WaveOne file (P<0.001). Root canal preparation time was significantly shorter (P<0.001) when an initial glide path had been prepared with PathFiles. CONCLUSION: Initial glide path preparation with PathFiles resulted in shorter preparation times and allowed a higher number of simulated canals to be prepared before failure of the WaveOne instruments.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonker,CH, van der Vyver,PJ, de Wet,FA
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: The South African Dental Association (SADA) 2014
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-85162014000600007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0011-85162014000600007
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0011-851620140006000072015-08-31The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instrumentsJonker,CHvan der Vyver,PJde Wet,FAINTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of two different glide path preparation methods on the fracture rate of the Primary 25/08 WaveOne reciprocating instrument. Preparation times for different glide path methods and total time for root canal preparation, with and without prior glide path preparation, were also calculated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ISO 15, 0.02 taper Endo-Training-Blocks (n = 300) were selected and randomly divided into three main groups (n = 100): Group 1: no glide path (control); Group 2: glide path preparation with stainless-steel hand files; and Group 3: glide path preparation with rotary PathFiles. The time taken to prepare each glide path was recorded. The specimens in each main group were then randomly assigned into five subgroups (n=20). New Primary 25/08 WaveOne files were used for canal preparation in each subgroup. The outcome was measured by recording how many simulated canals could be shaped with one WaveOne reciprocating file in each subgroup before instrument breakage occurred. The average time it took to prepare each of the simulated canals was calculated and recorded. The data were collected and statistically analysed using the ANOVA / Bonferroni test. RESULTS: Glide path preparation with PathFiles was significantly faster than with hand files (P<0.001). After the glide path preparation had been performed with PathFiles, a greater number of simulated canals could be prepared before failure of the WaveOne file (P<0.001). Root canal preparation time was significantly shorter (P<0.001) when an initial glide path had been prepared with PathFiles. CONCLUSION: Initial glide path preparation with PathFiles resulted in shorter preparation times and allowed a higher number of simulated canals to be prepared before failure of the WaveOne instruments.The South African Dental Association (SADA)South African Dental Journal v.69 n.6 20142014-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-85162014000600007en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Jonker,CH
van der Vyver,PJ
de Wet,FA
spellingShingle Jonker,CH
van der Vyver,PJ
de Wet,FA
The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments
author_facet Jonker,CH
van der Vyver,PJ
de Wet,FA
author_sort Jonker,CH
title The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments
title_short The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments
title_full The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments
title_fullStr The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments
title_full_unstemmed The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments
title_sort influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of waveone reciprocating instruments
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of two different glide path preparation methods on the fracture rate of the Primary 25/08 WaveOne reciprocating instrument. Preparation times for different glide path methods and total time for root canal preparation, with and without prior glide path preparation, were also calculated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ISO 15, 0.02 taper Endo-Training-Blocks (n = 300) were selected and randomly divided into three main groups (n = 100): Group 1: no glide path (control); Group 2: glide path preparation with stainless-steel hand files; and Group 3: glide path preparation with rotary PathFiles. The time taken to prepare each glide path was recorded. The specimens in each main group were then randomly assigned into five subgroups (n=20). New Primary 25/08 WaveOne files were used for canal preparation in each subgroup. The outcome was measured by recording how many simulated canals could be shaped with one WaveOne reciprocating file in each subgroup before instrument breakage occurred. The average time it took to prepare each of the simulated canals was calculated and recorded. The data were collected and statistically analysed using the ANOVA / Bonferroni test. RESULTS: Glide path preparation with PathFiles was significantly faster than with hand files (P<0.001). After the glide path preparation had been performed with PathFiles, a greater number of simulated canals could be prepared before failure of the WaveOne file (P<0.001). Root canal preparation time was significantly shorter (P<0.001) when an initial glide path had been prepared with PathFiles. CONCLUSION: Initial glide path preparation with PathFiles resulted in shorter preparation times and allowed a higher number of simulated canals to be prepared before failure of the WaveOne instruments.
publisher The South African Dental Association (SADA)
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-85162014000600007
work_keys_str_mv AT jonkerch theinfluenceofglidepathpreparationonthefailurerateofwaveonereciprocatinginstruments
AT vandervyverpj theinfluenceofglidepathpreparationonthefailurerateofwaveonereciprocatinginstruments
AT dewetfa theinfluenceofglidepathpreparationonthefailurerateofwaveonereciprocatinginstruments
AT jonkerch influenceofglidepathpreparationonthefailurerateofwaveonereciprocatinginstruments
AT vandervyverpj influenceofglidepathpreparationonthefailurerateofwaveonereciprocatinginstruments
AT dewetfa influenceofglidepathpreparationonthefailurerateofwaveonereciprocatinginstruments
_version_ 1756004399250931712