Habitus, reflexividade e realismo

Many scholars continue to ascribe a fundamental role to routine action in social theory and defend the continuing relevance of Bourdieu's concept of habitus. Meanwhile, the majority recognize the importance of reflexivity. In this article, Archer examines three versions of efforts to render these concepts mutually compatible: "empirical combination", "hybridization", and "theoretical and ontological reconciliation". In analytical terms, none of these versions is fully successful. The empirical argument is that the relevance of habitus began to decline in the late 20th century, in light of major structural changes in advanced capitalist democracies. In these circumstances, habitual forms have proven incapable of providing guidelines for people's lives, thus making reflexivity necessary. The article concludes with the argument that even the reproduction of one's birth history now constitutes a reflexive activity, and that the most favorable mode of its production, which the author refers to as "communicative reflexivity", is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Archer,Margaret S.
Format: Digital revista
Language:Portuguese
Published: Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) 2011
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582011000100005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0011-52582011000100005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0011-525820110001000052011-07-29Habitus, reflexividade e realismoArcher,Margaret S. habitus reflexivity critical realism Many scholars continue to ascribe a fundamental role to routine action in social theory and defend the continuing relevance of Bourdieu's concept of habitus. Meanwhile, the majority recognize the importance of reflexivity. In this article, Archer examines three versions of efforts to render these concepts mutually compatible: "empirical combination", "hybridization", and "theoretical and ontological reconciliation". In analytical terms, none of these versions is fully successful. The empirical argument is that the relevance of habitus began to decline in the late 20th century, in light of major structural changes in advanced capitalist democracies. In these circumstances, habitual forms have proven incapable of providing guidelines for people's lives, thus making reflexivity necessary. The article concludes with the argument that even the reproduction of one's birth history now constitutes a reflexive activity, and that the most favorable mode of its production, which the author refers to as "communicative reflexivity", is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)Dados v.54 n.1 20112011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582011000100005pt10.1590/S0011-52582011000100005
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language Portuguese
format Digital
author Archer,Margaret S.
spellingShingle Archer,Margaret S.
Habitus, reflexividade e realismo
author_facet Archer,Margaret S.
author_sort Archer,Margaret S.
title Habitus, reflexividade e realismo
title_short Habitus, reflexividade e realismo
title_full Habitus, reflexividade e realismo
title_fullStr Habitus, reflexividade e realismo
title_full_unstemmed Habitus, reflexividade e realismo
title_sort habitus, reflexividade e realismo
description Many scholars continue to ascribe a fundamental role to routine action in social theory and defend the continuing relevance of Bourdieu's concept of habitus. Meanwhile, the majority recognize the importance of reflexivity. In this article, Archer examines three versions of efforts to render these concepts mutually compatible: "empirical combination", "hybridization", and "theoretical and ontological reconciliation". In analytical terms, none of these versions is fully successful. The empirical argument is that the relevance of habitus began to decline in the late 20th century, in light of major structural changes in advanced capitalist democracies. In these circumstances, habitual forms have proven incapable of providing guidelines for people's lives, thus making reflexivity necessary. The article concludes with the argument that even the reproduction of one's birth history now constitutes a reflexive activity, and that the most favorable mode of its production, which the author refers to as "communicative reflexivity", is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.
publisher Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
publishDate 2011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582011000100005
work_keys_str_mv AT archermargarets habitusreflexividadeerealismo
_version_ 1756375559775977472