O conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?

This article analyzes whether the pork barrel political approach really exists in the context of legislative output by the Brazilian Congress. According to the author's argument, in the case of medium-large districts, multi-member districts (MMDs) increase the costs of investment in pork barrel bills of law. In addition, members of the Brazilian Congress face high legislative output costs that increase the incentives to avoid pork barrel strategies. The author investigates hypotheses on bills that were either approved or rejected by Congress, as well as those vetoed by the Executive, from 1991 to 2002. The results provide significant evidence for the author's theoretical argument. The study concludes that: (1) pork barrel bills are quantitatively insignificant in Brazil; (2) members of the Brazilian Congress invest much of their time and effort in pursuit of broader interests; and (3) seniority and internal law-making procedures can explain approved versus rejected distributive bills.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ricci,Paolo
Format: Digital revista
Language:Portuguese
Published: Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) 2003
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582003000400003
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0011-52582003000400003
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0011-525820030004000032004-04-20O conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?Ricci,Paolo legislative output pork barrel politics personal vote This article analyzes whether the pork barrel political approach really exists in the context of legislative output by the Brazilian Congress. According to the author's argument, in the case of medium-large districts, multi-member districts (MMDs) increase the costs of investment in pork barrel bills of law. In addition, members of the Brazilian Congress face high legislative output costs that increase the incentives to avoid pork barrel strategies. The author investigates hypotheses on bills that were either approved or rejected by Congress, as well as those vetoed by the Executive, from 1991 to 2002. The results provide significant evidence for the author's theoretical argument. The study concludes that: (1) pork barrel bills are quantitatively insignificant in Brazil; (2) members of the Brazilian Congress invest much of their time and effort in pursuit of broader interests; and (3) seniority and internal law-making procedures can explain approved versus rejected distributive bills.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)Dados v.46 n.4 20032003-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582003000400003pt10.1590/S0011-52582003000400003
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language Portuguese
format Digital
author Ricci,Paolo
spellingShingle Ricci,Paolo
O conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?
author_facet Ricci,Paolo
author_sort Ricci,Paolo
title O conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?
title_short O conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?
title_full O conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?
title_fullStr O conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?
title_full_unstemmed O conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?
title_sort o conteúdo da produção legislativa brasileira: leis nacionais ou políticas paroquiais?
description This article analyzes whether the pork barrel political approach really exists in the context of legislative output by the Brazilian Congress. According to the author's argument, in the case of medium-large districts, multi-member districts (MMDs) increase the costs of investment in pork barrel bills of law. In addition, members of the Brazilian Congress face high legislative output costs that increase the incentives to avoid pork barrel strategies. The author investigates hypotheses on bills that were either approved or rejected by Congress, as well as those vetoed by the Executive, from 1991 to 2002. The results provide significant evidence for the author's theoretical argument. The study concludes that: (1) pork barrel bills are quantitatively insignificant in Brazil; (2) members of the Brazilian Congress invest much of their time and effort in pursuit of broader interests; and (3) seniority and internal law-making procedures can explain approved versus rejected distributive bills.
publisher Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
publishDate 2003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582003000400003
work_keys_str_mv AT riccipaolo oconteudodaproducaolegislativabrasileiraleisnacionaisoupoliticasparoquiais
_version_ 1756375531481202688