On the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the Willmott indices

ABSTRACT A key step for any modeling study is to compare model-produced estimates with observed/reliable data. The original index of agreement (also known as original Willmott index) has been widely used to measure how well model-produced estimates simulate observed data. However, in its original version such index may lead the user to erroneously select a predicting model. Therefore, this study compared the sensibility of the original index of agreement with its two newer versions (modified and refined) and provided an easy-to-use R-code capable of calculating these three indices. First, the sensibility of the indices was evaluated through Monte Carlo Experiments. These controlled simulations considered different sorts of errors (systematic, random and systematic + random) and errors magnitude. By using the R-code, we also carried out a case of study in which the indices are expected to indicate that th empirical Thornthwaite’s model produces poor estimates of daily reference evapotranspiration in respect to the standard method Penman-Monteith (FAO56). Our findings indicate that the original index of agreement may indeed erroneously select a predicting model performing poorly. Our results also indicate that the newer versions of this index overcome such problem, producing more rigorous evaluations. Although the refined Willmott index presents the broadest range of possible values, it does not inform the user if a predicting model overestimate or underestimate the simulated data, resulting in no extra information regarding those already provided by the modified version. None of the indices represents the error as linear functions of its magnitude in respect to the observed process.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pereira,Heloisa Ramos, Meschiatti,Monica Cristina, Pires,Regina Célia de Matos, Blain,Gabriel Constantino
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Agronômico de Campinas 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052018000200394
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0006-87052018000200394
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0006-870520180002003942019-05-16On the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the Willmott indicesPereira,Heloisa RamosMeschiatti,Monica CristinaPires,Regina Célia de MatosBlain,Gabriel Constantino modified index of agreement refined index of agreement model performance ABSTRACT A key step for any modeling study is to compare model-produced estimates with observed/reliable data. The original index of agreement (also known as original Willmott index) has been widely used to measure how well model-produced estimates simulate observed data. However, in its original version such index may lead the user to erroneously select a predicting model. Therefore, this study compared the sensibility of the original index of agreement with its two newer versions (modified and refined) and provided an easy-to-use R-code capable of calculating these three indices. First, the sensibility of the indices was evaluated through Monte Carlo Experiments. These controlled simulations considered different sorts of errors (systematic, random and systematic + random) and errors magnitude. By using the R-code, we also carried out a case of study in which the indices are expected to indicate that th empirical Thornthwaite’s model produces poor estimates of daily reference evapotranspiration in respect to the standard method Penman-Monteith (FAO56). Our findings indicate that the original index of agreement may indeed erroneously select a predicting model performing poorly. Our results also indicate that the newer versions of this index overcome such problem, producing more rigorous evaluations. Although the refined Willmott index presents the broadest range of possible values, it does not inform the user if a predicting model overestimate or underestimate the simulated data, resulting in no extra information regarding those already provided by the modified version. None of the indices represents the error as linear functions of its magnitude in respect to the observed process.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Agronômico de CampinasBragantia v.77 n.2 20182018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052018000200394en10.1590/1678-4499.2017054
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Pereira,Heloisa Ramos
Meschiatti,Monica Cristina
Pires,Regina Célia de Matos
Blain,Gabriel Constantino
spellingShingle Pereira,Heloisa Ramos
Meschiatti,Monica Cristina
Pires,Regina Célia de Matos
Blain,Gabriel Constantino
On the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the Willmott indices
author_facet Pereira,Heloisa Ramos
Meschiatti,Monica Cristina
Pires,Regina Célia de Matos
Blain,Gabriel Constantino
author_sort Pereira,Heloisa Ramos
title On the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the Willmott indices
title_short On the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the Willmott indices
title_full On the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the Willmott indices
title_fullStr On the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the Willmott indices
title_full_unstemmed On the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the Willmott indices
title_sort on the performance of three indices of agreement: an easy-to-use r-code for calculating the willmott indices
description ABSTRACT A key step for any modeling study is to compare model-produced estimates with observed/reliable data. The original index of agreement (also known as original Willmott index) has been widely used to measure how well model-produced estimates simulate observed data. However, in its original version such index may lead the user to erroneously select a predicting model. Therefore, this study compared the sensibility of the original index of agreement with its two newer versions (modified and refined) and provided an easy-to-use R-code capable of calculating these three indices. First, the sensibility of the indices was evaluated through Monte Carlo Experiments. These controlled simulations considered different sorts of errors (systematic, random and systematic + random) and errors magnitude. By using the R-code, we also carried out a case of study in which the indices are expected to indicate that th empirical Thornthwaite’s model produces poor estimates of daily reference evapotranspiration in respect to the standard method Penman-Monteith (FAO56). Our findings indicate that the original index of agreement may indeed erroneously select a predicting model performing poorly. Our results also indicate that the newer versions of this index overcome such problem, producing more rigorous evaluations. Although the refined Willmott index presents the broadest range of possible values, it does not inform the user if a predicting model overestimate or underestimate the simulated data, resulting in no extra information regarding those already provided by the modified version. None of the indices represents the error as linear functions of its magnitude in respect to the observed process.
publisher Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052018000200394
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiraheloisaramos ontheperformanceofthreeindicesofagreementaneasytousercodeforcalculatingthewillmottindices
AT meschiattimonicacristina ontheperformanceofthreeindicesofagreementaneasytousercodeforcalculatingthewillmottindices
AT piresreginaceliadematos ontheperformanceofthreeindicesofagreementaneasytousercodeforcalculatingthewillmottindices
AT blaingabrielconstantino ontheperformanceofthreeindicesofagreementaneasytousercodeforcalculatingthewillmottindices
_version_ 1756375459446128640