THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: New recommendations for the management of patients with acute pancreatitis were set after the Atlanta Classification was revised in 2012. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present systematic review is to assess whether these recommendations have already been accepted and implemented in daily medical practices. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out in studies conducted with humans and published in English and Portuguese language from 10/25/2012 to 11/30/2018. The search was conducted in databases such as PubMed/Medline, Cochrane and SciELO, based on the following descriptors/Boolean operator: “Acute pancreatitis” AND “Atlanta”. Only Randomized Clinical Trials comprising some recommendations released after the revised Atlanta Classification in 2012 were included in the study. RESULTS: Eighty-nine studies were selected and considered valid after inclusion, exclusion and qualitative evaluation criteria application. These studies were stratified as to whether, or not, they applied the recommendations suggested after the Atlanta Classification revision. Based on the results, 68.5% of the studies applied the recommendations, with emphasis on the application of severity classification (mild, moderately severe, severe); 16.4% of them were North-American and 14.7% were Chinese. The remaining 31.5% just focused on comparing or validating the severity classification. CONCLUSION: Few studies have disclosed any form of acceptance or practice of these recommendations, despite the US and Chinese efforts. The lack of incorporation of these recommendations didn’t enable harnessing the benefits of their application in the clinical practice (particularly the improvement of the communication among health professionals and directly association with the worst prognoses); thus, it is necessary mobilizing the international medical community in order to change this scenario.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ALVES,José Roberto, FERRAZZA,Gustavo Heitich, NUNES JUNIOR,Ivan Nazareno, TEIVE,Marcelo Bianchini
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. 2021
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032021000100017
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0004-28032021000100017
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0004-280320210001000172021-04-20THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATIONALVES,José RobertoFERRAZZA,Gustavo HeitichNUNES JUNIOR,Ivan NazarenoTEIVE,Marcelo Bianchini Pancreatitis Classification Severity of illness index Prognosis ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: New recommendations for the management of patients with acute pancreatitis were set after the Atlanta Classification was revised in 2012. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present systematic review is to assess whether these recommendations have already been accepted and implemented in daily medical practices. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out in studies conducted with humans and published in English and Portuguese language from 10/25/2012 to 11/30/2018. The search was conducted in databases such as PubMed/Medline, Cochrane and SciELO, based on the following descriptors/Boolean operator: “Acute pancreatitis” AND “Atlanta”. Only Randomized Clinical Trials comprising some recommendations released after the revised Atlanta Classification in 2012 were included in the study. RESULTS: Eighty-nine studies were selected and considered valid after inclusion, exclusion and qualitative evaluation criteria application. These studies were stratified as to whether, or not, they applied the recommendations suggested after the Atlanta Classification revision. Based on the results, 68.5% of the studies applied the recommendations, with emphasis on the application of severity classification (mild, moderately severe, severe); 16.4% of them were North-American and 14.7% were Chinese. The remaining 31.5% just focused on comparing or validating the severity classification. CONCLUSION: Few studies have disclosed any form of acceptance or practice of these recommendations, despite the US and Chinese efforts. The lack of incorporation of these recommendations didn’t enable harnessing the benefits of their application in the clinical practice (particularly the improvement of the communication among health professionals and directly association with the worst prognoses); thus, it is necessary mobilizing the international medical community in order to change this scenario.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia v.58 n.1 20212021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032021000100017en10.1590/s0004-2803.202100000-05
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author ALVES,José Roberto
FERRAZZA,Gustavo Heitich
NUNES JUNIOR,Ivan Nazareno
TEIVE,Marcelo Bianchini
spellingShingle ALVES,José Roberto
FERRAZZA,Gustavo Heitich
NUNES JUNIOR,Ivan Nazareno
TEIVE,Marcelo Bianchini
THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION
author_facet ALVES,José Roberto
FERRAZZA,Gustavo Heitich
NUNES JUNIOR,Ivan Nazareno
TEIVE,Marcelo Bianchini
author_sort ALVES,José Roberto
title THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION
title_short THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION
title_full THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION
title_fullStr THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION
title_full_unstemmed THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION
title_sort acceptance of changes in the management of patients with acute pancreatitis after the revised atlanta classification
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: New recommendations for the management of patients with acute pancreatitis were set after the Atlanta Classification was revised in 2012. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present systematic review is to assess whether these recommendations have already been accepted and implemented in daily medical practices. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out in studies conducted with humans and published in English and Portuguese language from 10/25/2012 to 11/30/2018. The search was conducted in databases such as PubMed/Medline, Cochrane and SciELO, based on the following descriptors/Boolean operator: “Acute pancreatitis” AND “Atlanta”. Only Randomized Clinical Trials comprising some recommendations released after the revised Atlanta Classification in 2012 were included in the study. RESULTS: Eighty-nine studies were selected and considered valid after inclusion, exclusion and qualitative evaluation criteria application. These studies were stratified as to whether, or not, they applied the recommendations suggested after the Atlanta Classification revision. Based on the results, 68.5% of the studies applied the recommendations, with emphasis on the application of severity classification (mild, moderately severe, severe); 16.4% of them were North-American and 14.7% were Chinese. The remaining 31.5% just focused on comparing or validating the severity classification. CONCLUSION: Few studies have disclosed any form of acceptance or practice of these recommendations, despite the US and Chinese efforts. The lack of incorporation of these recommendations didn’t enable harnessing the benefits of their application in the clinical practice (particularly the improvement of the communication among health professionals and directly association with the worst prognoses); thus, it is necessary mobilizing the international medical community in order to change this scenario.
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE.
publishDate 2021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032021000100017
work_keys_str_mv AT alvesjoseroberto theacceptanceofchangesinthemanagementofpatientswithacutepancreatitisaftertherevisedatlantaclassification
AT ferrazzagustavoheitich theacceptanceofchangesinthemanagementofpatientswithacutepancreatitisaftertherevisedatlantaclassification
AT nunesjuniorivannazareno theacceptanceofchangesinthemanagementofpatientswithacutepancreatitisaftertherevisedatlantaclassification
AT teivemarcelobianchini theacceptanceofchangesinthemanagementofpatientswithacutepancreatitisaftertherevisedatlantaclassification
AT alvesjoseroberto acceptanceofchangesinthemanagementofpatientswithacutepancreatitisaftertherevisedatlantaclassification
AT ferrazzagustavoheitich acceptanceofchangesinthemanagementofpatientswithacutepancreatitisaftertherevisedatlantaclassification
AT nunesjuniorivannazareno acceptanceofchangesinthemanagementofpatientswithacutepancreatitisaftertherevisedatlantaclassification
AT teivemarcelobianchini acceptanceofchangesinthemanagementofpatientswithacutepancreatitisaftertherevisedatlantaclassification
_version_ 1756373600455098368